• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Who is the most racist the left or the right? [W:353]

Who is the most racist the left or the right?

  • Total voters
    112
Cardinal said:
Yeah, good luck with that. Navy, like a bunch of other members here, have thoroughly built their identities around the sole belief that D vs. R is equivalent to Lucifer vs. The Holy Trinity.
Click to expand...

And now your feelings are hurt?
 
Kobie said:
Liberals and nonwhites are not mutually exclusive. But congrats on your weak attempt to move the goalposts.
Click to expand...

Liberals classify women as minorities including white women. That's the way liberals think even though there are more women in America than males.

White males are a minority within the Democrat Party.

By 2040 whites will no longer be the majority in America unless America enforces the laws of the land and interprets the intent of the Constitution.

Will liberals classify whites as a minority ? Only if it furthers their political agenda.
 
APACHERAT said:
Liberals classify women as minorities including white women. That's the way liberals think even though there are more women in America than males.

White males are a minority within the Democrat Party.

By 2040 whites will no longer be the majority in America unless America enforces the laws of the land and interprets the intent of the Constitution.

Will liberals classify whites as a minority ? Only if it furthers their political agenda.
Click to expand...


You really do not understand why women are minorities?
 
APACHERAT said:
Liberals classify women as minorities including white women. That's the way liberals think even though there are more women in America than males.
Click to expand...
Let me help you out, we Dems do not have an issue with counting aggregate numbers. We recognize that women are "A group having little power or representation relative to other groups within a society".

White males are a minority within the Democrat Party.
Click to expand...
A duh comment.

By 2040 whites will no longer be the majority in America unless America enforces the laws of the land and interprets the intent of the Constitution.
Click to expand...
That is an argument expressing the idea that the US constitution....is a racist document.

Will liberals classify whites as a minority ? Only if it furthers their political agenda.
Click to expand...
There is that single definition issue again, as shown in your first sentence.
 
Grant said:
Just curious why you bothered with the ad hom. It didn't lend much to the debate.
Click to expand...

If you're bothered feel more than free to reverse the D and the R.
 
Gimmesometruth said:
Let me help you out, we Dems do not have an issue with counting aggregate numbers. We recognize that women are "A group having little power or representation relative to other groups within a society".
Click to expand...

Therefore, despite having superior numbers, they become a 'minority'.

Why is it that "women have little power or representation relative to other groups within a society" and what do the Democrats intend to do about it?

Do you recall how the Democrats have treated some women, like Sarah Palin?
 
Grant said:
Therefore, despite having superior numbers, they become a 'minority'.
Click to expand...
Become?

At what time in US history have women had a lot of power relative to white males?

Why are you guys so locked into ignoring that "minority" has more than one definition?

Why is it that "women have little power or representation relative to other groups within a society"
Click to expand...
Really, you have such little understanding of this issue......and you are looking for an education here to fill that gap?

Again, the basics of the topic (definitions, basic history) are so lacking.

and what do the Democrats intend to do about it?
Click to expand...
Amazing, the history of equal rights is also unknown.

Do you recall how the Democrats have treated some women, like Sarah Palin?
Click to expand...
I have heard this one before, "since Dems criticize Palin, they are therefore misogynists."

It would be embarrassing to realize just how poor your argument are, fortunately for you......you don't.
 
Grant said:
Greedy is not giving the government your money? Is that in the latest dictionary?
Click to expand...

How much of a cut do you think the Gubment deserves for constructing the roads you drive on and inventing the internet and so on?
 
Gimmesometruth said:
Become?

At what time in US history have women had a lot of power relative to white males?
Click to expand...

Men have often had more power in government but, to my understanding, women were never a minority according to the population.

Why are you guys so locked into ignoring that "minority" has more than one definition?
Click to expand...

What other definitions are there?

Really, you have such little understanding of this issue......and you are looking for an education here to fill that gap?
Again, the basics of the topic (definitions, basic history) are so lacking.
Amazing, the history of equal rights is also unknown.
Click to expand...

Then this could be an opportunity for you to debate the issues, which I assume is the reason you are here.
I have heard this one before, "since Dems criticize Palin, they are therefore misogynists."
Click to expand...
I don't really care what you have heard before. This is a debate forum.

It would be embarrassing to realize just how poor your argument are, fortunately for you......you don't.
Click to expand...

Any idea why you bothered showing up today?
 
aberrant85 said:
How much of a cut do you think the Gubment deserves for constructing the roads you drive on and inventing the internet and so on?
Click to expand...

We have government owned contractors working on the roads?
 
aberrant85 said:
How much of a cut do you think the Gubment deserves for constructing the roads you drive on and inventing the internet and so on?
Click to expand...

The internet that liberals opposed because it was designed for the U.S. Air Force to be used during a nuclear exchange.

Just like the interstate highway system, designed for the U.S. military. But back in the late 1950's, liberals were nationalist while today's liberals back then were internationalist socialist and Marxist.
 
i dont believe these results how can the left be more racist when we accept gays, womens equal pay, womens right to do as they wish with their body and people of all color give me a break..
 
im a demo but we did not disrespect sarah and bachman no more than they disrepected the president ....for them we are guilty ...she was funny ,ignorant and a straight out liar...but look ar hillary she is smart and other women too..... we respect women alot better than these repubs telling women what they can and cant do with their bodies those are the only too we strait out clowned but they really kind of deserved it...im sorry lol
 
Rocketman said:
We have government owned contractors working on the roads?
Click to expand...

I don't catch your meaning. The government pays contractors to maintain roads, right? So where does the government get the money?
 
aberrant85 said:
With that logic either side can claim the other is greedy because Republicans always want their taxes cut.
Click to expand...

Keeping more of the money that you earn is now being greedy? It seems to me that a gov't wanting ever more of other people's money is greedy. Just what percentage of GDP is the federal gov't supposed to "deserve"?
 
Bodhisattva said:
Affirmative Action sure as heck is racist... :lol: What are you on?



Why? Sure seems spot on to me.



There are white people that have not had an equal opportunity... AA is racist because it applies to "Race" instead of socio-economic status, the status of schools in certain areas, etc. Basing it on race indicates that race is the issue, thus making a claim that blacks have some inferior factor.
Click to expand...

See, I put a definition in this very thread for a reason. If you cannot be bothered to read it, that is your lacking, not mine. There is a clear distinction between "racial", dealing with race, and "racist", which requires an assumption of superiority or inferiority based on race.

You are not understanding the reasoning behind affirmative action, and instead saying what you wish that reasoning was so you could call it names instead of formulating actual reasoned arguments against it(hint: there are actual reasoned arguments against it, and in fact I am against AA for actual reasons and not because you want to use some label). AA is based on the (mistaken to some extent) beleife that black people, on average, have had less access to educational opportunities in this country. This does not mean, nor does it imply, nor does it suggest, that blacks are inferior. Your arguments are a classic example of why I avoid the term racists whenever possible, it stops people from actually thinking about issues.
 
ttwtt78640 said:
Keeping more of the money that you earn is now being greedy? It seems to me that a gov't wanting ever more of other people's money is greedy. Just what percentage of GDP is the federal gov't supposed to "deserve"?
Click to expand...

Income tax levels are near historic lows. Returning them to previous levels is hardly the gov't wanting more of your money. This is the "bleed the beast" grand strategy in process: ratchet down taxes during Republican administrations, then when fiscally responsible administrations want to reset them they're accused of being greedy.

Remember that in the 90's when Republicans were crying for a balanced budget they got it, and they got surpluses, cutting spending with Clinton's help. Then, when Bush was campaigning for president, instead of planning to pay off the National Debt with those savings (which is what Republicans claim they want to do) he bribed the American people by telling them they deserved that money in the form of tax cuts.

He gave out those tax cuts, and now those surpluses are deficits, yet according to Republicans the government is "greedy" for trying to return tax levels to where they were before.
 
Grant said:
You have read them. Maybe just move on.
Click to expand...

translation: you have none thats what i thought.
by all means though if that changes please back up the claim you made, simple provide your FACTUAL evidence that government AA/EO is racist, Id love to read them.

or yes, you just move on from a claim you cant support with any facts
 
Grant said:
In order to do that you'd have to go back to where we had been given the definitions of racism, my response to it and your following non-response. You seemed to feel that your single line cliche of "That's your opinion" was a form of debate.
Click to expand...

nope just pointing out facts, a point you are running from and i dont blame you since you wont be able to back your claim up
 
plutonium said:
im a demo but we did not disrespect sarah and bachman no more than they disrepected the president ....for them we are guilty ...she was funny ,ignorant and a straight out liar...but look ar hillary she is smart and other women too..... we respect women alot better than these repubs telling women what they can and cant do with their bodies those are the only too we strait out clowned but they really kind of deserved it...im sorry lol
Click to expand...

You're a sub-literate who can't put a sentence together and you are saying Sarah Palin is ignorant? Any irony would be lost on you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom