- Joined
- Apr 13, 2011
- Messages
- 34,951
- Reaction score
- 16,311
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Socialist
Your opinion, I disagree.
Please explain then.....
Your opinion, I disagree.
He should be impeached for lying to the American people...The only problem is if her was impeached we get Biden as president and that might be worse.
Just curious what did GWB do to warrant impeachment?
If we hold this standard to every president. Then 98% of American Presidents would be impeached.
Just curious what did GWB do to warrant impeachment?
Just curious what did GWB do to warrant impeachment?
When he commits a crime, I'll support his impeachment.
What Obama does is criminal, but he hasn't committed a crime.
Because something went wrong in a rollout someone should be impeached?
Damn right, the minute people that had great insurance started losing policies and coverage. That MF should be thrown in jail for the rest of his natural life along with Pelosi and Reid.
Because of a bill made 3 million people loose their ****ty insurance which is essentially what the bill is supposed to do?
You must have some real insight on the insurance industry to summarily dismiss 3 million policies as "s**tty".
Do you do part-time actuarial work? I was just wondering what formulae you used to come to this conclusion.
Now we've all heard that there were 3 presidents who were put up for impeachment:
1. Andrew Johnson
2. Bill Clinton
3. Richard Nixon (as a note, Nixon was never actually impeached, he just quit before he could be tried)
Now Johnson just tested the limitations of a law (the Tenure of Office act of 1867). He did this by trying to fire the Secretary of War, and that led to his trial. The house impeached him, but the senate didn't, so he stayed.
Bill Clinton admitted to having an affair after months of lying to people about it. Once again House impeached him, but the senate cleared him.
So my question is, should the disaster with obamacare, between the lying, the people loosing their healthcare, ect...,be enough to impeach Obama?
They did not meet the ACA's standard. Most of them were paid individually, not by the company, so most of them were not very good policies.
Not meeting the ACA's standard makes them "s**tty". Hilarious. That's like getting a 97% on your final and getting a B because the professor cuts off A at 98%.
Sorry you can't keep your "s**tty" 97%. We demand As around here.
Insurance policy and grades is a terrible comparrison.
"Some -- or maybe even most -- of the plans offered on the individual insurance market right now don't meet certain requirements in the health-care law. They may not offer preventive care without co-payment, for example, or leave out coverage of maternity care, one of the health-care law's 10 essential benefits."
This is why Obamacare is canceling some people’s insurance plans
So you're removing choice via an a-la-carte system and forcing people into policies with several provisions that they may very well never need...but still have to pay for.
How deliciously socialist of you. No differentiation, no choice. Automatons all around.
The system sets standards and still revolves around private insurance. So not "its not deliciously socialist of me".
Private insurance playing by strict and oppressive rules of the public sector.
If I run you down in my car and kill you, did you get killed by the car?
By allowing more people on private insurance. Yea, real "oppressive".
Numbers don't agree with you there, bud.
Of course they dont right now. People dont just magically find insurance again whippy snippy.
Because something went wrong in a rollout someone should be impeached?