I didn't make definite connection but A racist would oppose everything the President wanted,No?No, I have your posts trying to tie filibusters to racism. You can obfuscate all you wish, but the posts are there for all to see.
:doh So what? It was democrats doing it; you asked for a citation; I gave you a citation. :rwbelepha:failpail:
I didn't make definite connection but A racist would oppose everything the President wanted,No?
LOL - nice try. I gave you what you asked for.You gave me squat, you can't prove those people throwing eggs are Democrats or even political. Nice try though.
Do you have anything other than a rhetorical question?
I didn't make definite connection but A racist would oppose everything the President wanted,No?
Show me Democratic politicians conspiring to take down a president then you have something.LOL - nice try. I gave you what you asked for.
If it made you uch: not my problem.
If you think those people throwing eggs aren't democrats or even political, well LOL - not my problem either.
:lamo You bash liberals, and you're not partisan? Try again.
I'm sure the people who are complaining about this have no problem with the rhetoric of Fox News.
You, on the other hand, were trying to imply that Ms. Fluke had a medical reason for her need for government funded contraceptives.
Show me Democratic politicians conspiring to take down a president then you have something.
I never said a thing about medical need.
I have no idea what the woman's medical needs are.
So, in your view, Ms. Fluke wanted free contraceptives, not because she needed them for some rare medical condition and not because she was having sex, right? Is there a third reason?
She just wanted free stuff, is that it?
IIRC, Ms. Fluke did not speak about her needs, she spoke about someone else who needed the pill for medical reasons. Needs prescribed by a doctor.So, in your view, Ms. Fluke wanted free contraceptives, not because she needed them for some rare medical condition and not because she was having sex, right? Is there a third reason?
She just wanted free stuff, is that it?
When you're unmarried that's precisely what it suggests to most folks. Now thast suggestion may be inaccurate, but more times than not it's dead on.
Well there is the acne thing and the pill does lessen cramping and periods in general. :mrgreen:
So, in your view, Ms. Fluke wanted free contraceptives, not because she needed them for some rare medical condition and not because she was having sex, right? Is there a third reason?
She just wanted free stuff, is that it?
IIRC, Ms. Fluke did not speak about her needs, she spoke about someone else who needed the pill for medical reasons. Needs prescribed by a doctor.
Let me get this straight.
You're saying that most Americans think that unmarried women who take responsibility for their contraceptive health are promiscuous?
I'd like to see that proven in some way.
Do you have any evidence that this is the case?
See, I would suspect that most Americans would simply think that we're talking about women who are generally pretty monogamous but are, nevertheless, sexually active.
That's the boat that almost all adult women that I know, heck that I've ever known, fall into.
And unless you're a lunatic fringe fundamentalist Christian conservative, or a Muslim (two peas in a pod in many, many respects), you don't automatically conflate monogamous sexual activity out of wedlock with promiscuousness.