PLEASE READ BEFORE VOTING!!!
ok ok calm down, reading all the early obnoxious polls like this:
Poll: Clinton leads Christie in early look at 2016
Having Clinton vs Christie and Clinton winning got me thinking, what if that is what happens?
What if these are the two people who run against each other?
While i dont agree with them both on everything i do like things about both of them, I honestly believe that would be the two best candidates to run against each other or at least among the best in 50 years.
I can honestly say barring something extreme being in their running platforms i would be "OK" with either of them so im curious what others think especially since so many seem to like them both.
Now again this isnt about who is better between them or what individual stances you like about them but about if you think it would be the best two candidates or among the best we have had in 50 years? I think so.
i only have 10 spots in a poll so im just going to group the winning president with who ran against him, please vote for the times you think the presidential candidates were better, and no not ONE candidate better, but BOTH. When were there two candidate that were better?
I did this quick so i may have made mistakes in the years etc but who cares, here they are check all that apply when you see TWO candidates you think are better?
Please pick all the times you think the TWO candidates were BOTH better than Clinton vs Christie would be.
5 years (Obama vs McCain, Romney
6-13 years (W Bush vs Kerry, Gore)
14-21 years (Clinton vs Dole, H.W. Bush)
22-25 years (H.W. Bush vs Dukakis)
26-33 years (Reagan vs Mondale, Carter)
34-37 years (Cater vs Ford)
38-45 years ( Nixon vs Humphrey, McGovern)
46-49 years ( Johnson vs Goldwater)
50-54 years (Kennedy vs Nixon)
I love mashed potatoes . . . hmmmmmmmmmmmm
Poll to follow be patient
also please feel free to specify exactly which are better when the groups are together