• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]

Who would you NOT consider voting for in 2016? Pick all that apply

  • Total voters
    108
TurtleDude said:
lets see

1) she is a classic wealthy dem who demonizes wealthy corporate fat cats while craving to be one herself

2) her Lieawatha nonsense was pathetic. Its more likely she was related to people who drove NAs on the "trail of tears" than being a Native American

3) she apparently played the affirmative action card to get some of her jobs

4) she is a gun hating twit

5) she thinks government should have more control over private property. She essentially is a welfare socialist twit
Click to expand...

She is a lying twit too.

dances-with-perjury-elizabeth-warren-nativeamerican-harvard-politics-1336779687.jpg
 
Muhammed said:
No. However I do understand that that is one of the reasons that so many LIVs vote Democrat.
Click to expand...

Ah...a political philosophical thing, huh? Conservatives...don't kill kids, huh?
 
Anyone with a D or R next to their name on the ballot.
 
Joe Biden? We'd get into another war because of his gaffes. :lol: Who knows what kind of national secrets he might "accidentally" give away?
 
Chris Christie? He'd probably end up having a heart attack or a stroke if he ever became president, probably couldn't handle the stress. Kind of an ass kisser too.
 
and she scares the hell out of the GOP--as per her slap-down of the GOP Senators today..
now sarah palin going after the pope for being too liberal--this is the mindless stuff of legends..
and to you also ChrisL, as with TurtleDude--
TurtleDude said:
she's a fungus infected scum bag.
Click to expand...
 
NIMBY said:
and she scares the hell out of the GOP--as per her slap-down of the GOP Senators today..
now sarah palin going after the pope for being too liberal--this is the mindless stuff of legends..
and to you also ChrisL, as with Turtle Dude--
Click to expand...

I worry about men who lionize male hating lefty harpies like Fauxchontas
 
And I suppose you agree that Obama should not be able to appoint any more federal judges, the real reason we're here tonite..
TurtleDude said:
I worry about men who lionize male hating lefty harpies like Fauxchontas
Click to expand...
 
NIMBY said:
And I suppose you agree that Obama should not be able to appoint any more federal judges, the real reason we're here tonite..
Click to expand...

I think the GOP should do to Obama's picks what the Dems did to Miguel Estrada and Peter Keisler
 
Dems have a sorry history of being ******s to the GOP, rolling over for Clarence Thomas justices of the world..
And now the old geezer Sen. Grassley threatens us with more Alitos, Scalias, and Thomas, showing their true intentions..
I won't bother googling your two as they are few and far between compared to now .
TurtleDude said:
I think the GOP should do to Obama's picks what the Dems did to Miguel Estrada and Peter Keisler
Click to expand...
 
Removable Mind said:
Ah...a political philosophical thing, huh? Conservatives...don't kill kids, huh?
Click to expand...
Are you seriously trying to justify the murder of innocent children by claiming that "conservatives" do it too?

Think about it!
 
NIMBY said:
Dems have a sorry history of being ******s to the GOP, rolling over for Clarence Thomas justices of the world..
And now the old geezer Sen. Grassley threatens us with more Alitos, Scalias, and Thomas, showing their true intentions..
I won't bother googling your two as they are few and far between compared to now .
Click to expand...

a court of nothing but Alitos and Scalias would be great. Both are BRILLIANT scholars and don't think the creeping crud of socialism is a great idea unlike the two Obama appointments
 
you didn't mention clarence..
as well, I believe Roberts and Kennedy are now the "third" wing..
TurtleDude said:
a court of nothing but Alitos and Scalias would be great. Both are BRILLIANT scholars and don't think the creeping crud of socialism is a great idea unlike the two Obama appointments
Click to expand...
 
NIMBY said:
you didn't mention clarence..
as well, I believe Roberts and Kennedy are now the "third" wing..
Click to expand...

Roberts sort of lost my respect in his idiocy with the ACA
 
I understand your feelings..I still think ACA was a split-decision favoring right-of-center..As with VRA..
TurtleDude said:
Roberts sort of lost my respect in his idiocy with the ACA
Click to expand...
I believe Robers is looking at legacy..I wish I knew what you did on Law..
I don't often say those kind of things, but when I do, I'll be buying some dos Aquis .
 
NIMBY said:
Dems have a sorry history of being ******s to the GOP, rolling over for Clarence Thomas justices of the world..
And now the old geezer Sen. Grassley threatens us with more Alitos, Scalias, and Thomas, showing their true intentions..
I won't bother googling your two as they are few and far between compared to now .
Click to expand...

If you think about it, each party has a history of "being ******s to" the other party. It keeps Democrats from acknowledging that the GOP's ideology is frequently compromised, and it keeps Republicans from admitting the same in regard to Democrats. Frankly, I'm fine with that reality.
 
Muhammed said:
Translation: I talked my emotionally vulnerable girlfriend into killing our baby because the little bastard would have been a temporary inconvenience.
Click to expand...

Not every ****ing thread is about abortion. Please take that elsewhere.
 
Puigb said:
The amount of votes Rand Paul received is a good thing.
Click to expand...



When I think of Rand Paul, I think of plagerism and anti civil rights.. When I think of Ted Cruz, I think of his father--truly frightening. :eek:
 
Since I lean left, you might expect me to bring up Majority Leader Frist campaigning in South Dakota against Minority Leader Daschle, something unheard of before then or after..Imagine how unhinged McConnell would get if Reid ever came to Kentucky..

As it is, we are now frozen in time again with the filibuster until another very short-term agreement can be made during the "nuclear option" period of time in January..

I'm not sure the House can even come up with a bill for "keep your health plan" that can pass, unless Dems get skittish..

As for the Senate, I see the body as too complicated to do anything in these last 12 days of session this year..

Fiddytree said:
If you think about it, each party has a history of "being ******s to" the other party.
Click to expand...
The pressure on Republican Senators to blow up D.C. according to the whims of Cruz and Heritage/DeMint will overwhelm McConnell and the Elite..
It keeps Democrats from acknowledging that the GOP's ideology is frequently compromised,
and it keeps Republicans from admitting the same in regard to Democrats. Frankly, I'm fine with that reality.
Click to expand...
Without an apparent Dem. opponent, I'd take a Christie/Rubio ticket,
both infuriating TEApartiers still mad at Rubio for the Dream act the House is sitting on..
I was sick of Clinton before her husband opened his big mouth..
And she stabbed Biden in the back over bin Laden to boot..I'd prefer Gillibrand in a heartbeat (more like 2020)
I don't think the GOP is smart enough to look at Gov. Pence to go with Gov. Christie .
 
Last edited:
Gipper said:
I don't know if I'd consider that a positive. The uninformed populace don't take that into consideration. That's why they elected a man who was a United States Senator for all of about 37 seconds to the highest office in the land.

I can easily see Warren selling snake oil, knowing that fools are more interested in unfulfillable dreams than actual goals.
Click to expand...

Well, since there is no one in all of American politics who will actually do the will of the people, the best we can hope for is someone with their own ideas who is too oblivious to stray from them -- and that's why I said consider. It's not the most glowing endorsement I could give.

Warren has been under more pressure, being more active, for longer, than Obama was. That doesn't mean she won't pull the same stunt; that is always a possibility. But everyone else in the running is either nuts, or is only susceptible to pressure from money, not the people. So...
 
Middleground said:
If you read about her history, you'll see that trying to change the status quo on many issues dealing with the middle class has pretty much become her mission. And by mistake, too. At one time she was representing bug business going after the middle class and after a while, she saw a pattern that completely changed her though process and opinions. That the people she was going after were not cheats but were victims of circumstance. Like not being able to pay for medical bills. That epiphany has lead her to where she is now.
Click to expand...

That's all good and well -- and who am I to tell her that isn't true -- but being an American, I'm too jaded to feel no apprehension that she won't just revert.

I think she's demonstrated well over the last few years, and that's why I'd consider her... but stranger things have happened.
 
Hillary, Joe, or Jeb seem to be likely candidates for me.
 
Redress said:
Some notes before people ask: Joe Biden is only on the list because as VP he stands a decent chance of being a nominee for the democrats
Click to expand...

Do you really think that's the case? I have a very difficult time imagining that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom