View Poll Results: Who would you NOT consider voting for in 2016? Pick all that apply

Voters
131. You may not vote on this poll
  • Hillary Clinton

    69 52.67%
  • Andrew Cuomo

    69 52.67%
  • Elizibeth Warren

    61 46.56%
  • Rand Paul

    75 57.25%
  • Ted Cruz

    85 64.89%
  • Chris Christie

    38 29.01%
  • Jeb Bush

    80 61.07%
  • Jon Huntsman

    44 33.59%
  • Marco Rubio

    71 54.20%
  • Joe Biden

    91 69.47%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 5 of 16 FirstFirst ... 3456715 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 151

Thread: For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]

  1. #41
    Tavern Bartender
    Pussy Grabbin' Beaver
    Middleground's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Canada's Capital
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:33 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    22,449
    Blog Entries
    1

    re: For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]


    This is a major change. And with major change, problem will be aplenty. If you don't think special interest is fighting tooth and nail for this failure, then I have a bridge to sell you. Give it time. There is a lot wrong with Obamacare but it's truly a step in the right direction.
    No men are anywhere, and Im allowed to go in, because Im the owner of the pageant and therefore Im inspecting it, Trump said... Is everyone OK? You know, theyre standing there with no clothes. Is everybody OK? And you see these incredible looking women, and so I sort of get away with things like that.

  2. #42
    Guru
    Smeagol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Last Seen
    02-19-17 @ 11:35 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,147

    re: For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]

    I don't think I could vote for Cruz or Paul; just too divisive and unwilling to work with other leaders who aren't in lock step with them IMHO. However, I'm always willing to listen and could be convinced otherwise. 2016 is still 3 years away.
    Having opinions all over the map is a good sign of a person capable of autonomous thinking. Felix -2011

  3. #43
    Sage
    shrubnose's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Europe
    Last Seen
    11-29-17 @ 03:46 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    18,851
    Blog Entries
    2

    re: For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]

    Quote Originally Posted by Redress View Post
    Obama is not the topic. Can we please stick to the topic?



    Some people take every chance that they find to attack Obama.

    I believe that they are wasting their time and energy.

    They should be posting comments about who and what they support.
    Last edited by shrubnose; 11-13-13 at 05:13 PM.

  4. #44
    Sage
    Sherman123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Northeast US
    Last Seen
    11-23-17 @ 11:12 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    7,774

    re: For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]

    Quote Originally Posted by Middleground View Post
    Her major concern for the US is the health of the people. Without the middle class, the US is screwed and tattooed. and it's no surprised that with each passing day, that class is getting smaller and smaller. We have a similar problem in Canada, too, though not quite as bad.
    I think she has very bad recipes for ensuring either a sustained recovery or increased prosperity. The example I gave was to highlight that I think she is a populist at heart with a populists policy prescriptions for government.

  5. #45
    Guru
    Cyrylek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Boston
    Last Seen
    02-05-17 @ 01:49 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    3,467

    re: For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]

    From the list, I would not vote for Biden or Warren under any circumstances. From the Republican side, I would click on Bachmann and Santorum, if they were mentioned.

  6. #46
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Theoretical Physics Lab
    Last Seen
    01-06-15 @ 11:06 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    25,120

    re: For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]

    Quote Originally Posted by Middleground View Post
    This is a major change. And with major change, problem will be aplenty. If you don't think special interest is fighting tooth and nail for this failure, then I have a bridge to sell you. Give it time. There is a lot wrong with Obamacare but it's truly a step in the right direction.
    How can you blame special interests? We're talking about the "grand opening" of this beneficial, benevolent, ground-breaking legislation that's supposed to do all this good and help all these people. Also, if that didn't do the trick, he even made it illegal not to do it.

    Now you have all these people - people clamoring for all this great "change" and for "hope" - getting the promise sold to them, and actually choosing to break the law and get fined instead of getting this oh-so-great thing that Obama is providing. That's pretty damning, if you ask me.

    All this shows me is how democracy is an abject failure, ruined by the "rights" of the intellectually bereft.

  7. #47
    Tavern Bartender
    Pussy Grabbin' Beaver
    Middleground's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Canada's Capital
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:33 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    22,449
    Blog Entries
    1

    re: For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]

    Quote Originally Posted by Sherman123 View Post
    I think she has very bad recipes for ensuring either a sustained recovery or increased prosperity. The example I gave was to highlight that I think she is a populist at heart with a populists policy prescriptions for government.
    And what is wrong with that? Frankly, I think it's a most pleasant change from most politicians.
    No men are anywhere, and Im allowed to go in, because Im the owner of the pageant and therefore Im inspecting it, Trump said... Is everyone OK? You know, theyre standing there with no clothes. Is everybody OK? And you see these incredible looking women, and so I sort of get away with things like that.

  8. #48
    Tavern Bartender
    Pussy Grabbin' Beaver
    Middleground's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Canada's Capital
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:33 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    22,449
    Blog Entries
    1

    re: For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]

    Quote Originally Posted by Gipper View Post
    How can you blame special interests? We're talking about the "grand opening" of this beneficial, benevolent, ground-breaking legislation that's supposed to do all this good and help all these people. Also, if that didn't do the trick, he even made it illegal not to do it.

    Now you have all these people - people clamoring for all this great "change" and for "hope" - getting the promise sold to them, and actually choosing to break the law and get fined instead of getting this oh-so-great thing that Obama is providing. That's pretty damning, if you ask me.

    All this shows me is how democracy is an abject failure, ruined by the "rights" of the intellectually bereft.
    Gipper... despite the glitches, it will happen. New operating systems suck **** until the bugs are ironed out.
    No men are anywhere, and Im allowed to go in, because Im the owner of the pageant and therefore Im inspecting it, Trump said... Is everyone OK? You know, theyre standing there with no clothes. Is everybody OK? And you see these incredible looking women, and so I sort of get away with things like that.

  9. #49
    Tavern Bartender
    Pussy Grabbin' Beaver
    Middleground's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Canada's Capital
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:33 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    22,449
    Blog Entries
    1

    re: For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]

    Quote Originally Posted by Sherman123 View Post
    I think she has very bad recipes for ensuring either a sustained recovery or increased prosperity. The example I gave was to highlight that I think she is a populist at heart with a populists policy prescriptions for government.
    She was looking for the same interest rates that were granted to big banks. How do you feel about the low interest they are charged?
    No men are anywhere, and Im allowed to go in, because Im the owner of the pageant and therefore Im inspecting it, Trump said... Is everyone OK? You know, theyre standing there with no clothes. Is everybody OK? And you see these incredible looking women, and so I sort of get away with things like that.

  10. #50
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Theoretical Physics Lab
    Last Seen
    01-06-15 @ 11:06 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    25,120

    re: For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]

    Quote Originally Posted by Middleground View Post
    Gipper... despite the glitches, it will happen. New operating systems suck **** until the bugs are ironed out.
    It also helps when competent people tackle the project, instead of it being given in no-bid contracts to your wife's roommate.

    Man, I wish I knew Barry or Chelle growing up. I'd be in like Flynn, baby.

Page 5 of 16 FirstFirst ... 3456715 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •