View Poll Results: Who would you NOT consider voting for in 2016? Pick all that apply

Voters
131. You may not vote on this poll
  • Hillary Clinton

    69 52.67%
  • Andrew Cuomo

    69 52.67%
  • Elizibeth Warren

    61 46.56%
  • Rand Paul

    75 57.25%
  • Ted Cruz

    85 64.89%
  • Chris Christie

    38 29.01%
  • Jeb Bush

    80 61.07%
  • Jon Huntsman

    44 33.59%
  • Marco Rubio

    71 54.20%
  • Joe Biden

    91 69.47%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 15 of 16 FirstFirst ... 513141516 LastLast
Results 141 to 150 of 151

Thread: For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]

  1. #141
    On Vacation
    joko104's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 04:30 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    31,569
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]

    All but Clinton and Paul.

  2. #142
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Last Seen
    02-18-14 @ 08:18 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    5,660

    Re: For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]

    Rand Paul would be the absolute best, Hillary would be the absolute worst with Biden coming in at just plain stupid. The rest would just consolation prizes.

  3. #143
    Tavern Bartender
    Pussy Grabbin' Beaver
    Middleground's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Canada's Capital
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 07:17 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    22,458
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]

    Quote Originally Posted by TurtleDude View Post
    what you constantly fail to understand is that these gun banners incrementally limit stuff. We saw that in NY. How about a law that said citizens get all the same things that civilian police departments get
    I don't agree. It's just fear being instilled by the NRA.
    No men are anywhere, and Im allowed to go in, because Im the owner of the pageant and therefore Im inspecting it, Trump said... Is everyone OK? You know, theyre standing there with no clothes. Is everybody OK? And you see these incredible looking women, and so I sort of get away with things like that.

  4. #144
    Tavern Bartender
    Pussy Grabbin' Beaver
    Middleground's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Canada's Capital
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 07:17 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    22,458
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]

    Quote Originally Posted by The Mark View Post
    A counter argument would be: "better to have the rounds and not need them, then not have them and need them".

    Or my personal favorite - "since there is no good reason to limit the number of rounds in a clip, no law limiting such should be created"
    Hey, if you wanna ply Jesse James in your living room, go for it. Most people who think it's overkill.
    No men are anywhere, and Im allowed to go in, because Im the owner of the pageant and therefore Im inspecting it, Trump said... Is everyone OK? You know, theyre standing there with no clothes. Is everybody OK? And you see these incredible looking women, and so I sort of get away with things like that.

  5. #145
    warrior of the wetlands
    TurtleDude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:05 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    180,766

    Re: For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]

    Quote Originally Posted by Middleground View Post
    I don't agree. It's just fear being instilled by the NRA.
    well you obviously aren't paying attention to what has happened in states like NY, Connecticut, California and New Jersey.



  6. #146
    Sporadic insanity normal.


    The Mark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:16 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    19,752

    Re: For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]

    Quote Originally Posted by Middleground View Post
    Hey, if you wanna ply Jesse James in your living room, go for it. Most people who think it's overkill.
    I don't personally own any guns atm.

    I'm just saying..."oh that's a lot, you don't need THAT many bullets at once" ...does not constitute a valid reason to disallow owning such things.


    Edit: IOW, so what if it's overkill?
    Education.

    Sometimes I think we're alone. Sometimes I think we're not. In either case, the thought is staggering. ~ R. Buckminster Fuller

  7. #147
    Angry Former GOP Voter
    Fiddytree's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:51 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    25,703

    Re: For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]

    Quote Originally Posted by Middleground View Post
    And I am tried of gun lovers who are ignorant about the calibre of weapon needed to defend oneself. Most police officers do not carry thosr types of overly powerful weapons, so why should the public?
    They won't likely *need* all that they own, but I consider it more of a hobby. I'm cool with that. I see no reason to clamp down on gun use. That being said, I might be more into background checks than they are, but eh, I have no passion against guns.
    Michael J Petrilli-"Is School Choice Enough?"-A response to the recent timidity of American conservatives toward education reform. https://nationalaffairs.com/publicat...-choice-enough

  8. #148
    Advisor
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Colorado, U.S.A
    Last Seen
    06-05-14 @ 11:13 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    464

    Re: For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]

    Quote Originally Posted by Middleground View Post
    Hey, if you wanna ply Jesse James in your living room, go for it. Most people who think it's overkill.
    Is that a reason to impose on our constitutional right to bare arms? Personally i believe that the entirety of the american people should be able to vote whether or not to take away a freedom we have. We may have voted for our representatives in congress but there are things we can not afford to just let slide. Raising the debt ceiling, fine they are going to do it anyways. Political party crap like the shut down, fine not much we can do to end bipartisan crap at the moment. Impeding on our constitutional rights, no.

    I believe we should add a contingency clause to the Constitution. Should any state find a law or motion in congress that it wants to vote on, that the PEOPLE of that state want to vote on, then the people of that state may vote, as one singular body worth at least two congressional votes in either half of congress, on that law, so long as it pertains to any motion involving the constitution, or a law that would effect at least half of the general population of that state.

    Let me make this clear. this is not a state legislature vote, this is a form of direct democracy similar to the way the electoral collage is run, where the people vote determines which side of the argument the two votes go to.

    Thoughts?
    Last edited by JJB3333; 11-19-13 at 11:04 PM. Reason: Grammatical error

  9. #149
    Advisor
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Colorado, U.S.A
    Last Seen
    06-05-14 @ 11:13 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    464

    Re: For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]

    Quote Originally Posted by Henrin View Post
    First off, learn math. When was the second amendment ratified? Try 1791. It was 222 years ago, not 130 years ago. The last time I checked it doesn't say that it only protects arms from 1791 and earlier. Do you see that anywhere in the second amendment? No, because it's meant to protect the peoples right to bear arms, not to protect their right to bear only certain arms from a certain time period.

    Who the hell cares what the police carry? Does it look like I care? Nope, I don't give a ****. Do you know why? Because this isn't about what the mother****ing police carry, but about what the people carry. The only time it matters what the police carry is when the people aren't allowed to carry the same weaponry. Other than that, who cares? As long as the people have their right to bear arms protected and can carry the same weaponry as police it doesn't matter one bit to the conversion at hand.

    Oh and I can be concerned about two things that once. Maybe that is just me though.
    Ok i totally agree but one or two points i just want to comment on.

    1.People care about what the police have when he police are defending themselves against ak's with pistols
    and actually thats it

  10. #150
    Tavern Bartender
    Pussy Grabbin' Beaver
    Middleground's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Canada's Capital
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 07:17 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    22,458
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]

    Quote Originally Posted by JJB3333 View Post
    Is that a reason to impose on our constitutional right to bare arms?
    Hey, do whatever the hell you want with a razor or wax... I won't judge.
    No men are anywhere, and Im allowed to go in, because Im the owner of the pageant and therefore Im inspecting it, Trump said... Is everyone OK? You know, theyre standing there with no clothes. Is everybody OK? And you see these incredible looking women, and so I sort of get away with things like that.

Page 15 of 16 FirstFirst ... 513141516 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •