View Poll Results: Who would you NOT consider voting for in 2016? Pick all that apply

Voters
131. You may not vote on this poll
  • Hillary Clinton

    69 52.67%
  • Andrew Cuomo

    69 52.67%
  • Elizibeth Warren

    61 46.56%
  • Rand Paul

    75 57.25%
  • Ted Cruz

    85 64.89%
  • Chris Christie

    38 29.01%
  • Jeb Bush

    80 61.07%
  • Jon Huntsman

    44 33.59%
  • Marco Rubio

    71 54.20%
  • Joe Biden

    91 69.47%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 10 of 16 FirstFirst ... 89101112 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 151

Thread: For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]

  1. #91
    warrior of the wetlands
    TurtleDude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:46 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    180,733

    Re: For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]

    Quote Originally Posted by NIMBY View Post
    you didn't mention clarence..
    as well, I believe Roberts and Kennedy are now the "third" wing..
    Roberts sort of lost my respect in his idiocy with the ACA



  2. #92
    Sage


    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    IL
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:28 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    36,837

    Re: For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]

    I understand your feelings..I still think ACA was a split-decision favoring right-of-center..As with VRA..
    Quote Originally Posted by TurtleDude View Post
    Roberts sort of lost my respect in his idiocy with the ACA
    I believe Robers is looking at legacy..I wish I knew what you did on Law..
    I don't often say those kind of things, but when I do, I'll be buying some dos Aquis .
    Physics is Phun

  3. #93
    Angry Former GOP Voter
    Fiddytree's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last Seen
    Today @ 08:04 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    25,703

    Re: For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]

    Quote Originally Posted by NIMBY View Post
    Dems have a sorry history of being pussies to the GOP, rolling over for Clarence Thomas justices of the world..
    And now the old geezer Sen. Grassley threatens us with more Alitos, Scalias, and Thomas, showing their true intentions..
    I won't bother googling your two as they are few and far between compared to now .
    If you think about it, each party has a history of "being pussies to" the other party. It keeps Democrats from acknowledging that the GOP's ideology is frequently compromised, and it keeps Republicans from admitting the same in regard to Democrats. Frankly, I'm fine with that reality.
    Michael J Petrilli-"Is School Choice Enough?"-A response to the recent timidity of American conservatives toward education reform. https://nationalaffairs.com/publicat...-choice-enough

  4. #94
    Liberal Fascist For Life!


    Redress's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Georgia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 08:33 PM
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    93,340
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]

    Quote Originally Posted by Muhammed View Post
    Translation: I talked my emotionally vulnerable girlfriend into killing our baby because the little bastard would have been a temporary inconvenience.
    Not every ****ing thread is about abortion. Please take that elsewhere.
    We became a great nation not because we are a nation of cynics. We became a great nation because we are a nation of believers - Lindsey Graham

    Quote Originally Posted by Fiddytree View Post
    Uh oh Megyn...your vagina witchcraft is about ready to be exposed.

  5. #95
    Guru
    Juanita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    now? COLORADO
    Last Seen
    04-27-16 @ 03:50 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Progressive
    Posts
    3,981

    Re: For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]

    Quote Originally Posted by Puigb View Post
    The amount of votes Rand Paul received is a good thing.


    When I think of Rand Paul, I think of plagerism and anti civil rights.. When I think of Ted Cruz, I think of his father--truly frightening.

  6. #96
    Sage


    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    IL
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:28 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    36,837

    Re: For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]

    Since I lean left, you might expect me to bring up Majority Leader Frist campaigning in South Dakota against Minority Leader Daschle, something unheard of before then or after..Imagine how unhinged McConnell would get if Reid ever came to Kentucky..

    As it is, we are now frozen in time again with the filibuster until another very short-term agreement can be made during the "nuclear option" period of time in January..

    I'm not sure the House can even come up with a bill for "keep your health plan" that can pass, unless Dems get skittish..

    As for the Senate, I see the body as too complicated to do anything in these last 12 days of session this year..

    Quote Originally Posted by Fiddytree View Post
    If you think about it, each party has a history of "being pussies to" the other party.
    The pressure on Republican Senators to blow up D.C. according to the whims of Cruz and Heritage/DeMint will overwhelm McConnell and the Elite..
    It keeps Democrats from acknowledging that the GOP's ideology is frequently compromised,
    and it keeps Republicans from admitting the same in regard to Democrats. Frankly, I'm fine with that reality.
    Without an apparent Dem. opponent, I'd take a Christie/Rubio ticket,
    both infuriating TEApartiers still mad at Rubio for the Dream act the House is sitting on..
    I was sick of Clinton before her husband opened his big mouth..
    And she stabbed Biden in the back over bin Laden to boot..I'd prefer Gillibrand in a heartbeat (more like 2020)
    I don't think the GOP is smart enough to look at Gov. Pence to go with Gov. Christie .
    Last edited by NIMBY; 11-14-13 at 12:43 AM.
    Physics is Phun

  7. #97
    Sage
    SmokeAndMirrors's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    RVA
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:00 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    18,174

    Re: For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]

    Quote Originally Posted by Gipper View Post
    I don't know if I'd consider that a positive. The uninformed populace don't take that into consideration. That's why they elected a man who was a United States Senator for all of about 37 seconds to the highest office in the land.

    I can easily see Warren selling snake oil, knowing that fools are more interested in unfulfillable dreams than actual goals.
    Well, since there is no one in all of American politics who will actually do the will of the people, the best we can hope for is someone with their own ideas who is too oblivious to stray from them -- and that's why I said consider. It's not the most glowing endorsement I could give.

    Warren has been under more pressure, being more active, for longer, than Obama was. That doesn't mean she won't pull the same stunt; that is always a possibility. But everyone else in the running is either nuts, or is only susceptible to pressure from money, not the people. So...

  8. #98
    Sage
    SmokeAndMirrors's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    RVA
    Last Seen
    Today @ 07:00 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    18,174

    Re: For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]

    Quote Originally Posted by Middleground View Post
    If you read about her history, you'll see that trying to change the status quo on many issues dealing with the middle class has pretty much become her mission. And by mistake, too. At one time she was representing bug business going after the middle class and after a while, she saw a pattern that completely changed her though process and opinions. That the people she was going after were not cheats but were victims of circumstance. Like not being able to pay for medical bills. That epiphany has lead her to where she is now.
    That's all good and well -- and who am I to tell her that isn't true -- but being an American, I'm too jaded to feel no apprehension that she won't just revert.

    I think she's demonstrated well over the last few years, and that's why I'd consider her... but stranger things have happened.

  9. #99
    Sage
    DDD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Republic of Dardania
    Last Seen
    05-06-17 @ 06:00 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    12,173

    Re: For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]

    Hillary, Joe, or Jeb seem to be likely candidates for me.
    Quote Originally Posted by poweRob View Post
    Stats come out and always show life getting better. News makes money in making you think its not.
    The Republic of Dardania is the proper name for: http://www.debatepolitics.com/europe...ification.html

  10. #100
    Sage
    cpwill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    USofA
    Last Seen
    Today @ 08:11 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    57,145

    Re: For Every One: Who Would You NOT Consider Voting For In 2016 [W:58]

    Quote Originally Posted by Redress View Post
    Some notes before people ask: Joe Biden is only on the list because as VP he stands a decent chance of being a nominee for the democrats
    Do you really think that's the case? I have a very difficult time imagining that.

Page 10 of 16 FirstFirst ... 89101112 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •