• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Should we amend the ACA so that Felons cannot be Navigators?

How should we ensure our Navigator Workforce?

  • No Restrictions - let the Navigators work

    Votes: 2 25.0%
  • No Federal Restrictions - Whatever the States Want is fine

    Votes: 1 12.5%
  • No Felons

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No Felons, and a background investigation

    Votes: 5 62.5%

  • Total voters
    8

cpwill

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 20, 2009
Messages
75,611
Reaction score
39,893
Location
USofA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
Apparently this was never addressed. Which seems rather insane, given the exponential growth in identity theft, and the amount of personal information that Americans are required to put into the system.

Marco Rubio has apparently introduced a bill to forbid the hiring of felons as Navigators. Yea or Nay?
 
Navigators of what?

Forgive me. I'm a foreigner.
 
Apparently this was never addressed. Which seems rather insane, given the exponential growth in identity theft, and the amount of personal information that Americans are required to put into the system.

Marco Rubio has apparently introduced a bill to forbid the hiring of felons as Navigators. Yea or Nay?

Felons should not be allowed to work at all, ever, in any job. They broke the law, their life is over. But lets clarify - felons or ex-felons?
 
Good point - it was assumed that it was people who had broken the law, done jail time, and were now out.
 
Navigators of what?

Forgive me. I'm a foreigner.

:) Obamacare. These are the people that we are supposed to hand over our social security numbers, birthdates, medical issues, personal and family information.... everything that is an identity thief's dream.
 
:) Obamacare. These are the people that we are supposed to hand over our social security numbers, birthdates, medical issues, personal and family information.... everything that is an identity thief's dream.
Ah. I see. In that case, it's a moral debate. Personally, I'm gonna err on the side of caution and say no. At least concerning those convicted of the more serious crimes. Especially as they might relate specifically to white collar crime. Why take the chance when there are persons of impeccable character to fill the vacancies?
 
Ah. I see. In that case, it's a moral debate. Personally, I'm gonna err on the side of caution and say no. At least concerning those convicted of the more serious crimes. Especially as they might relate specifically to white collar crime. Why take the chance when there are persons of impeccable character to fill the vacancies?


Bingo. It's veterans day - we have 10% unemployment among recent veterans, and they have all already had a background check, and many probably even have SECRET clearances. Let's hire them.
 
Bingo. It's veterans day - we have 10% unemployment among recent veterans, and they have all already had a background check, and many probably even have SECRET clearances. Let's hire them.
Sounds good to me. As you say, at least we know they've been screened.
 
I'm fine with being as strict as possible regarding the navigators.
 
Are we discussing the felons who work at the prisons or are we discussing people who have completed their punishment and had their civil rights restored AKA ex-felons.

I must admit I'm OK with both for different reasons and a few obvious precautions.
 
What was the person's felony? Was it ID theft or something related, or was it completely unrelated?

Anyway, in answer to the question, I say no restrictions. You already hand over personal identifying information on an almost daily basis to people you don't know, many of whom have questionable character. Don't be a chicken little over isolated, albeit high-profile, incidents.
 
What was the person's felony? Was it ID theft or something related, or was it completely unrelated?

Anyway, in answer to the question, I say no restrictions. You already hand over personal identifying information on an almost daily basis to people you don't know, many of whom have questionable character. Don't be a chicken little over isolated, albeit high-profile, incidents.


:) awesome. I am currently unemployed and in need of cash. Please PM me your social security number, date of birth, full name, family members' names, their dates of birth, and some basic account information :)


;) cmon. Don't be chicken - little.
 
Oh. And your income and tax information. :D Thanks!
 
Back
Top Bottom