• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

If You Had to Vote For One or the Other?

If You Had to Vote For One of the Other?

  • Elizabeth Warren

    Votes: 8 25.0%

  • Hillary Clinton

    Votes: 7 21.9%

  • Neither

    Votes: 17 53.1%
  • Total voters
    32
CanadaJohn said:
I guess you're not allowed to participate in your fantasy poll unless you're willing to be defamed as a douche bag, is that it?
Click to expand...

The degree of uncontrollable hysteria of the loons, reflected in their exponentially increasing name calling, ridicule and endless swearing is an accurate bellwether of the extent to which they now are able to visualize the coming failure of their silly president and his destructive, anti-American agenda. They actually can now see it all coming down.

When they have nothing left but a choice between Hillary and Elizabeth Warren as their ticket, they know the late night comedy shows can't be far behind. That is the reaction we are seeing.
 
Last edited:
Redress said:
Apparently alot of people who are not dems/libs are voting, which kinda ruins your purpose.
Click to expand...

Yeah, it's a damn shame that those pesky repubs/cons vote in elections and get in your way, right? :2razz:
 
CanadaJohn said:
No, not a douche, but there are other less flattering words that would be more accurately descriptive.
Click to expand...

I consider the appropriate words, like "smart", and "successful" and "intelligent" to be flattering actually.
 
MarineTpartier said:
Let's say it comes down to Elizabeth Warren vs Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primaries in 2016. Which one would you vote for? I also provided the choice of "neither" for all of the douche bags that will inevitably post "they both suck".
Click to expand...

They do both SUCK and I'm not a 'douche' anything.

One is a Marxist pig and the other is just a pig.
 
Redress said:
Or the fact you did not specify. If you want to know what dems/libs think, you should specify that. Most voting in this poll are neither, so your results are fatally flawed.
Click to expand...
You're such a negative nancy Redress. I'm trying to make a joke and you gotta be all serious about it. Lighten up dude.
 
CanadaJohn said:
Yeah, it's a damn shame that those pesky repubs/cons vote in elections and get in your way, right? :2razz:
Click to expand...

Those "pesky repubs/cons," as you put it, are more in the way of the GOP than they are the dems. It's as if they are handing the democrats an "easy" button.

View attachment 67156542
 
MarineTpartier said:
...it's intended purpose which is to find out which candidate Dems/Liberals would rather have...
Click to expand...

CanadaJohn said:
Yeah, it's a damn shame that those pesky repubs/cons vote in elections and get in your way, right? :2razz:
Click to expand...

Note the intended purpose of the person who made the thread, which is what I was responding to. Might be better to read before being snide.
 
Redress said:
Am I a douche if I say I would have no problem voting for either?
Click to expand...
No, you're a douche for other reasons totally unrelated to this thread.:2razz:
 
Redress said:
Note the intended purpose of the person who made the thread, which is what I was responding to. Might be better to read before being snide.
Click to expand...

It's always wise to be snide - gets under liberal skin and that's always a bonus.
 
CanadaJohn said:
Are you saying Warren and Clinton are easy?
Click to expand...

I'm saying the GOP has more to worry about within their own ranks than they do from the Democrat camp.

The next election should be the GOP's for the taking. Unless they change their tune and bitch slap all those Limbaughnauts doing their talking for them, the democrats are going to walk right in with minimum effort.
 
Captain America said:
I'm saying the GOP has more to worry about within their own ranks than they do from the Democrat camp.

The next election should be the GOP's for the taking. Unless they change their tune and bitch slap all those Limbaughnauts doing their talking for them, the democrats are going to walk right in with minimum effort.
Click to expand...

I was teasing, but you are right - the GOP really doesn't have much to worry about if Warren and Clinton are the best the Democrats can offer after 8 disasterous years of Obama. If you thought there was Bush/Republican fatigue in 2008, just wait for 2016 and everyone runs away from Obama and anyone associated with him.
 
Captain America said:
I'm saying the GOP has more to worry about within their own ranks than they do from the Democrat camp.

The next election should be the GOP's for the taking. Unless they change their tune and bitch slap all those Limbaughnauts doing their talking for them, the democrats are going to walk right in with minimum effort.
Click to expand...

They need to go back to the say no evil about other republicans during the primary and they can glide into the White House. They just gotta get everybody pooling war chests and avoiding negativity.
 
Fisher said:
They need to go back to the say no evil about other republicans during the primary and they can glide into the White House. They just gotta get everybody pooling war chests and avoiding negativity.
Click to expand...

I understand the "speak no evil" about their partisan colleagues, however, it's the population that votes and somewhat decides who is president. (I say, "somewhat," because I seem to recall one election where the candidate with the most votes didn't win the election at all. That electoral collage thingy.)

And I think the majority of America, for the most part, is smarter than the average bear. I find humor in people who wrap themselves in the American flag and sing the praises of our nation from one side of their mouth, and then accuse the majority of our citizenry of being a bunch of stupid idiots, out of the other side, when they don't get their way.
 
MarineTpartier said:
Let's say it comes down to Elizabeth Warren vs Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primaries in 2016. Which one would you vote for? I also provided the choice of "neither" for all of the douche bags that will inevitably post "they both suck".
Click to expand...

No brainer! Hilary is more of the same just like Obama, Bush the first torturer, etc. Warren is absolutely hated by the 1% and that is enough to get my Green vote.
 
MarineTpartier said:
Let's say it comes down to Elizabeth Warren vs Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primaries in 2016. Which one would you vote for? I also provided the choice of "neither" for all of the douche bags that will inevitably post "they both suck".
Click to expand...

If the choice was between Warren and Clinton, being I'm from Georgia and Georgia requires no party registration, I would vote in the Republican primary for Christie.
 
Under no circumstances would I ever vote for any woman.
 
Captain America said:
I understand the "speak no evil" about their partisan colleagues, however, it's the population that votes and somewhat decides who is president. (I say, "somewhat," because I seem to recall one election where the candidate with the most votes didn't win the election at all. That electoral collage thingy.)

And I think the majority of America, for the most part, is smarter than the average bear. I find humor in people who wrap themselves in the American flag and sing the praises of our nation from one side of their mouth, and then accuse the majority of our citizenry of being a bunch of stupid idiots, out of the other side, when they don't get their way.
Click to expand...

The majority of America has never voted for any Presidential candidate so far as I know. Those majority of those who do vote will never get more than the minimum necessary to keep their party in charge. It is like winning a dollar on a dollar scratch ticket--it is all about keeping you coming back for more.
 
MarineTpartier said:
Sorry guys, misspelled "vote" on the title thread lol. I suck.
Click to expand...
Just click on the triangle at the bottom left of the OP and request the change.
====================================

I would vote for Hillary because she more likely to win.
 
In good conscience I couldn't vote for either. I'd rather not vote and know that my vote didn't contribute to either one of them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom