• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Will Hillary run for President in 2016. upgraded verison

What do you think about Hill-dog in 2016.


  • Total voters
    37
She has the experience of being in the White House for 8 years alongside Bill, then as New York Senator, then as Secretary of State, she knows the ropes and certainly is not as old as Reagan when he became President. She at least is greatly qualified, and not some run of the mill noob who is wet behind the ears born in Canada.

If she was qualified Benghazi would not have happened. If she can't correctly do a job that's lesser than the President....she's not qualified to do the job of the President. You don't **** up and then get promoted. That doesn't happen in the real world.
 
yeah no one died at Benghazi-its just a lie the RW media fabricated.

Oh people died...it just wasn't the scandal that FauxNews tried to make it....and the American people saw right through the bull ****.
 
If she was qualified Benghazi would not have happened. If she can't correctly do a job that's lesser than the President....she's not qualified to do the job of the President. You don't **** up and then get promoted. That doesn't happen in the real world.

How do you explain 911 and Iraq?
 
How do you explain 911 and Iraq?

How would you want to explain? I'm not sure what your getting at. There's no relevancy.

Edit: Actually I think you are trying to make some sort of really weak Bush turn around....which would be really lame so I hope that's not what you are trying to do. Neither of the two events are even remotely similar to Benghazi.
 
Oh people died...it just wasn't the scandal that FauxNews tried to make it.

Your right. it was worse. The liberal sheeple saw what they we're told to see and declared it bull****. They'd declare the holocaust bull **** if their masters told them to. It's several years too late to claim the liberals see through bull**** - you guys are now in the business of fabricating and mass producing the bull****.
 
Oh people died...it just wasn't the scandal that FauxNews tried to make it....and the American people saw right through the bull ****.

translation-partisan supporters of Hillary will dismiss her incompetence and her toadies in the media told the sheep nothing went wrong
 
She has the experience of being in the White House for 8 years alongside Bill, then as New York Senator, then as Secretary of State, she knows the ropes and certainly is not as old as Reagan when he became President. She at least is greatly qualified, and not some run of the mill noob who is wet behind the ears born in Canada.

I have had the opportunity to watch her entire political career unfold beginning with what she was willing to sacrifice in the way of integrity to be a Senator. I think she is ethically bankrupt and will never cast a vote for her.
 
How would you want to explain? I'm not sure what your getting at. There's no relevancy.

Edit: Actually I think you are trying to make some sort of really weak Bush turn around....which would be really lame so I hope that's not what you are trying to do. Neither of the two events are even remotely similar to Benghazi.


Maybe I'm wrong about you....but most people who scream and yell "Benghazi" were the same ones that don't raise an eyebrow about the thousands who died in Iraq and those who died in 911
 
I cannot think of two worse candidates

Lieawatha and the Hildabeast.

what sort of man would want either of those two twits as president?

This one:

pic-2-Bill-Clinton-groping-Statue-of-Liberty-copy.png
 
If she was qualified Benghazi would not have happened. If she can't correctly do a job that's lesser than the President....she's not qualified to do the job of the President. You don't **** up and then get promoted. That doesn't happen in the real world.


I guess that means that George Bush wasn't qualified as President since he let 9/11 happen as well as 12 embassies getting bombed! :lol::lol:

Well, she didn't ****up, I think the GOP ****ed up when they refused to allow funding for more security at Benghazi.....and, Hillary will be our first woman President...you can take that to the bank. (Especially if you run that Canadian fraud noob who is still wet behind the ears and cost the country $24B for just blowing smoke)!
 
I'd rather have Hunstman. Can you Republicans get rid of the morons in your party so he can win the primary? Please?
 
Rutabaga is an illegitimate but deeply adored love child of cabbage and - well, another kind of cabbage, known as Brassica rapa.

Before potato has arrived from the colonies, rutabaga was a food and forage staple in much of Eastern Europe. Its bulbous root is almost nutritious, relatively delicious (if your cook is a borderline genius), and can be stored for the whole winter without spoilage.

In other words, if it really comes down to Hillary Clinton against Rutabaga, Rutabaga it is.

Why You Should Give Rutabaga a Chance | The Kitchn

I agree and knew what a rutabaga is. I was unfamiliar with the "roteaga" however. :mrgreen:
 
You seriously think so?

I agree that a lot can happen between now and then, but...If the GOP (or a hypothetical third party) will produce a minimally viable candidate, what exactly does she have to offer?

Forget "Christie/Martinez". Let it be something like Rubio, or Jindal, or Nikki Haley. There - you have a "compelling personal story", as American as the bloody apple pie.

Hillary Clinton? - well, she had married the right guy. Fireworks. Other than that?

She doesn't have much to offer to someone aware of her lack of leadership, but you said it yourself, she's associated with the 90s, which everyone yearns for now. Considering she was almost nominated in '08 and that was before the economic collapse? Also if the GOP/tea party primary forces them all into extremism again, whoever wins will look a lot worse than they do now by election time. Some of Christie's comments as governor just aren't compatible with winning that primary.
 
unlike bill, hillary has zero charisma
the GOP should be recruiting an appealing moderate candidate
someone with charisma, who is younger than hillary

the best thing hillary has going for her is bill
the worst thing hillary has going for her is bill ... and her age ... and her lack of charisma

but if the republicans run a winger, crown her now




I tend to agree, but I have mixed feelings about her.

The lady has a lot of ability,but she has shown poor judgement and made some bad decisions at times. So is she really the best person for the job?

I don't think that we can answer that question until we see who else wants the job.
 
Last edited:
I wonder if they saved Howard Taft's office chair? They may need it to fit her fat but in the oval office.
 
She has the experience of being in the White House for 8 years alongside Bill, then as New York Senator, then as Secretary of State, she knows the ropes and certainly is not as old as Reagan when he became President. She at least is greatly qualified, and not some run of the mill noob who is wet behind the ears born in Canada.




As far as I know she doesn't have any real health problems so serving two terms wouldn't be a problem at her age. She would be 78 years old after two terms. Not that old for a healthy lady.
 
Hillary wont run.
She's a liability to her party at this point and she knows it. Running her as the Democratic candidate would be about the same as the Democrats handing the Presidency to the Republicans on a silver platter. I for one do not think Democrats are that stupid. I know she has her fans, and they're a very loud, vocal, ...minority. I think most the Democrats are going to look for a younger and more robust candidate because you can bet the GOP is doing that already - Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Rand Paul...just for examples. Hillary is a part of the status quo that's been causing the problems in government for decades - one of the exclusive wealthy families that rule our nation. She has a ton of baggage on her from Benghazi to just about everything else. She's done in politics....she knows it, Obama knows it, and Bill certainly knows it because he hasn't kept it exactly a secret that he doesn't like Obama on a personal level. So I don't pay much attention to those who claim Hillary is going to run, the Democrats are not that stupid, Hillary isn't that stupid, she'll retire for the Party.




You don't know for sure that she won't run, you are just giving your worthless (To me.) opinion.
 
How would you want to explain? I'm not sure what your getting at. There's no relevancy.

Edit: Actually I think you are trying to make some sort of really weak Bush turn around....which would be really lame so I hope that's not what you are trying to do.
Neither of the two events are even remotely similar to Benghazi.




Correct.

G.W. Bush's screw ups are so much worse that they're not even in the same ballpark of terrible things to let happen and cause to happen.
 
I have had the opportunity to watch her entire political career unfold beginning with what she was willing to sacrifice in the way of integrity to be a Senator.
I think she is ethically bankrupt and will never cast a vote for her.




Your failure to vote for her will not keep her out of the White House.
 
Back
Top Bottom