• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Will Hillary run for president in 2016? [W:114]

Will Hillary run for president in 2016


  • Total voters
    17
nope a realist

A ##### Republican !

Why not identify yourself as one ?

Are you a liberal conservative aka "neoconservative "

A moderat conservative ?

A conservative

Hard core right wing conservative ?

Or a reactionary ?
 
A ##### Republican !

Why not identify yourself as one ?

Are you a liberal conservative aka "neoconservative "

A moderat conservative ?

A conservative

Hard core right wing conservative ?

Or a reactionary ?

im independent have been for years and always will be

"stereotypical" ill never fit the mold of either party, even my major stances wouldnt allow me to be categorized.
 
Republican donors moving to Democrat Michelle Nunn in Georgia..
A ##### Republican !
Why not identify yourself as one ?
Are you a liberal conservative aka "neoconservative "
A moderat conservative ?
A conservative
Hard core right wing conservative ?
Or a reactionary ?
Georgia is moving Purple brother..
Nunn winning the Senate in 2014 could have coattails in 2016 for any Democratic candidate .
 
Last edited:
Is it okay to be American first and issue-oriented second??
Not on Debate Politics where hacks force people such as with your poll !
A ##### Republican !

Why not identify yourself as one ?

Are you a liberal conservative aka "neoconservative "

A moderat conservative ?

A conservative

Hard core right wing conservative ?

Or a reactionary ?
 
Republican donors moving to Democrat Michelle Nunn in Georgia..
Georgia is moving Purple brother..
Nunn winning the Senate in 2014 could have coattails in 2016 for any Democratic candidate .

A blue Atalanta that want's free stuff can put a democrat senator in Washington, but most of Georgia don't want to pay for free stuff for those living in Atlanta.

Atalanta might go blue but most of Georgia will not.
 
side wager???even Repub money bundlers are running to the conservative daughter
of a former conservative Democratic Senator--blue dogs!!!!
A blue Atalanta that want's free stuff can put a democrat senator in Washington, but most of Georgia don't want to pay for free stuff for those living in Atlanta..Atlanta might go blue but most of Georgia will not.
divide, divide, divide into red and blue--escape from Orange county--
 
Last edited:
side wager???even Repub money bundlers are running to the conservative daughter of a conservative Democratic Senator--blue dogs!!!!
divide, divide, divide into red and blue--escape from Orange county--

A "Blue Dog Democrat" as in a Reagan Democrat or as a democrat who opposed Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid dictating how it will be in congress ?

Blue Dog Democrats who actually represent their constituents and who are not in lock step with the radical left who controls the Democrat Party.

I like that.

It's Americana.
 
A "Blue Dog Democrat" as in a Reagan Democrat or as a democrat who opposed Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid dictating how it will be in congress.

a blue dog democrat is anything but a phony reagan democrat..
reagan was a chicken-hawk--blue dogs not so much--and that's just the beginning .
 
a blue dog democrat is anything but a phony reagan democrat..
reagan was a chicken-hawk--blue dogs not so much--and that's just the beginning .

That was a quick response, less than two minutes.

May explain why Obama is sitting in the White House today.

THINK
 
Blue Dog Democrats who actually represent their constituents and who are not in lock step
with the radical left who controls the Democrat Party.

Blue dog Democrats of this Century are like Heitkamp up in North Dakota, Tester in Montana, Begich in Alaska, Manchin in West Virginia, even Landrieu in LA, Pryor in Arkansas, McCaskill in Missouri, Donnelly in Indiana, Hagan in NC, and my rising star Gillibrand in New York..We are taking back our party and you should do the same with yours .
 
Last edited:
Doesn't take much to debunk the putrid idea of Reagan democrats being blue-dogs..FYI, Reagan Dems were disaffected union idiots in northern states like my Illinois..aren't you glad Reagan got the ball rolling toward 17 trillion ?
That was a quick response, less than two minutes.

May explain why Obama is sitting in the White House today.

Obama's in the White House because of Palin and then Romney .
 
Blue dog Democrats of this Century are like Heitkamp up in North Dakota, Tester in Montana, Begich in Alaska, Manchin in West Virginia, even Landrieu in LA, Pryor in Arkansas, McCaskill in Missouri, Donnelly in Indiana, Hagan in NC, and my rising star Gillibrand in New York..We are taking back our party and you should do the same with yours .

It's about ###### time that Americans took back the Democrat Party that was hijacked during the 1970's by the fringe of the radical left. (New Left)

Maybe the neoconservatives who were the JFK/LBJ liberals back during the 1960's will leave the GOP tent and go back under the Democrat tent ?

I have no problem with Americans taking back control of the Democrat Party that was hijacked by radical socialist.

If I weren't backed stabbed in the back by the Democrat Party who sent me to a war in Vietnam, I would probably be a register Democrat today.
 
I don't know how you feel with respect to Vietnam but my older friends told me about it..
My father did know how you felt when he came back to Travis and Scott after TDY..
He cried endlessly when the flagged was burned on TV..
Escorting fallen bodies home broke him and he went back to drink..
I'm bitter as hell inside--he should still be alive today..

As for amnesty, those who went to Canada should have had to serve at least two years of state-side duty..
I hated the 2S deferment that took my older friends to Vietnam since they didn't go to college..
I hated punks like Quayle, Limbaugh, Cheney, and especially that phony ****head Nugent..
I was 1H for 7 years starting in '72 and knew Kissinger would end the draft in an election year..
And, I didn't vote for Carter either time..He was a ****ing disaster but I hated Ted scum kennedy even more..
Dad was pissed at Ford for taxing his government pensions..Now you've got my eyes soaked..
It's about ###### time that Americans took back the Democrat Party
that was hijacked during the 1970's by the fringe of the radical left. (New Left)
Too bad Clinton ruined his legacy by acting as a latter-day Kennedy..

Maybe the neoconservatives who were the JFK/LBJ liberals back during the 1960's will leave the GOP tent and go back under the Democrat tent ?
They will now become independents and libertarians, which is fine with me..
I have no problem with Americans taking back control of the Democrat Party that was hijacked by radical socialist.
We aren't the only party that needs taken back..The new conservative women in our party are tough ass nails..
If I weren't backed stabbed in the back by the Democrat Party who sent me to a war in Vietnam, I would probably be a register Democrat today.

I put it on LBJ for not trying to win the war but I'm sure his advisors were the real problem..However, I don't know the secrets like you do..The fact that he drank himself to death and died during Nixon's first term tells me enough..I was 14 when Nixon beat HHH with Wallace's help .
 
Last edited:
If I weren't backed stabbed in the back by the Democrat Party who sent me to a war in Vietnam,
I would probably be a register Democrat today.
I'm sure you're referring to the Democrats pulling support from the soldiers to win the war..
This is why I still watch as much Military Channel and so on to learn all I can..
It is a shame it took until 1985 and 1986 until there were parades honoring you guys..
I remember my Vietnam buddies being treated like **** by our local VFW..
For his part, I give Reagan credit for making you guys feel whole again .
 
I think Hillary,will run and become the Female to be President of The United States !
 
Why such limiting options?

No, I don't think she will run. Too many skeletons in the Benghazi closet. She would be ripped to pieces over that, plus it would become an issue as to why we attacked Libya like it has not been yet.
 
This thread is deteriorating very quickly. Can we please stay on topic. Thank you
What topic?

Binary thinking?

I don;'t think Hillary is stupid enough to run. She monumentally screwed up with this Bengahzi thing. Maybe most good democrats and liberals don't know it, but she does, and she knows what type of truth will come out.

I honestly don't believe she stepped down from SoS to run. She stepped down to stop the investigations. Those investigations will resume should she run for president, and even if no fault is found, it will ruin her.
 
Why would she? She lost in2008

Adlai Stevenson, Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, John McCain, Al Gore....you take your pick with other examples...but there is good enough reason to run again to gain the nomination from your Party, even if you may lose.
 
Adlai Stevenson, Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, John McCain, Al Gore....you take your pick with other examples...but there is good enough reason to run again to gain the nomination from your Party, even if you may lose.
Three examples you gave are losers. The only ones that were president were Nixon and Reagan.
 
Three examples you gave are losers. The only ones that were president were Nixon and Reagan.

So what? They gain the nomination to the Party. The opportunity matters most. Furthermore, Gore was a close call, as you know.
 
So what, second place is a fancy word for losing. And you forgot mitt Romney.

Multiple runs is one of many potential reasons why a candidate does not win, and those are more important.

Hardly forgot Mitt. I was giving some examples out of many.
 
Still don't think Hillary will win.

That's fine, but let's not pretend it is primarily because of the loser during the primary or general election issue. That's been something rather contentious since the beginning of our election process. Even though the set-up was different, Jefferson did lose out to Adams, and Adams lost out to Washington, Andrew Jackson lost out to John Quincy Adams; and more recently George H.W. Bush lost to Reagan.
 
Back
Top Bottom