Are you intentionally ignoring facts to be amusing?Sorry. The majority has already spoken. I will let the data stand alone.
In your mind, only.It's already decided.
Maybe for you it's decided, others have a different point of view.
Are you intentionally ignoring facts to be amusing?
Are you considering data from an unscientific poll on a political debate site to be useful fact?9 out of 17 votes constitutes a majority. Are you ignoring facts to be obnoxious?
Are you considering data from an unscientific poll on a political debate site to be useful fact?
Some data from a scientific poll?Yes
Do you have a better suggestion?
9 out of 17 votes constitutes a majority. Are you ignoring facts to be obnoxious?
I have noticed that quite often the same people who want to get government off of Wall Street's back want the same government to stick its nose into every American bedroom for various reasons.
"Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government jhas gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves." ~ Ronald Reagan
It's already decided.
Good question but then in the end you're talking stuff I'm not interested about at all. to answer your good question here: I say people should need a license to breed just like they need a license to drive, unless they want to go live in a lawless island where anything goes (see this is what pvsi.net means to the world on YouTube) 2 children limit per family unless you show above certain amount of steady income.Now that the elitist have convinced the American public to accept abortion as a morally reasonable thing to do, the next step is to implement mandatory abortions to those who are unfit to be parents. This was envisioned by Plato as a way to improve the quality of the human species much in the same way that cattle are bred to improve the heard.
The question I have to ask is: When Should Mandatory Abortions be implemented in the United States?
vasuderatorrent
Below is a quote from Book V of Plato's Republic
Unsolicited Commentary: Plato’s Republic: Book Five
"The second wave regarded the communal rearing of children, closely linked to the breeding of the females by only the best men. Socrates was intent upon destroying any bond that might develop except the bonds of a person to their community. The greatest evil was that which caused factions (462b). To this end he erased the family from the lives of the guardians and auxiliaries. No marriages were to be allowed. The best warriors would be directed to mate periodically with the women and the children of those unions would be raised collectively. Not even the mother would know who her offspring were. Socrates goes so far as to insist that this is the most natural way for our best men and women to procreate and exist together. It is not unlike the fighting dogs or game cocks which Glaucon raises at his home 459a).
It is hard to imagine how this relates to the soul of a human except that, perhaps, we should look closely at the relationships to which we cling. In this light, the argument that the offspring of unwarranted intercourse should be aborted is not quite so hideous."
Good question but then in the end you're talking stuff I'm not interested about at all. to answer your good question here: I say people should need a license to breed just like they need a license to drive, unless they want to go live in a lawless island where anything goes (see this is what pvsi.net means to the world on YouTube) 2 children limit per family unless you show above certain amount of steady income.
The Germans went way beyond euthanasia.
Now that the elitist have convinced the American public to accept abortion as a morally reasonable thing to do, the next step is to implement mandatory abortions to those who are unfit to be parents. This was envisioned by Plato as a way to improve the quality of the human species much in the same way that cattle are bred to improve the heard.
The question I have to ask is: When Should Mandatory Abortions be implemented in the United States?
vasuderatorrent
Below is a quote from Book V of Plato's Republic
Unsolicited Commentary: Plato’s Republic: Book Five
"The second wave regarded the communal rearing of children, closely linked to the breeding of the females by only the best men. Socrates was intent upon destroying any bond that might develop except the bonds of a person to their community. The greatest evil was that which caused factions (462b). To this end he erased the family from the lives of the guardians and auxiliaries. No marriages were to be allowed. The best warriors would be directed to mate periodically with the women and the children of those unions would be raised collectively. Not even the mother would know who her offspring were. Socrates goes so far as to insist that this is the most natural way for our best men and women to procreate and exist together. It is not unlike the fighting dogs or game cocks which Glaucon raises at his home 459a).
It is hard to imagine how this relates to the soul of a human except that, perhaps, we should look closely at the relationships to which we cling. In this light, the argument that the offspring of unwarranted intercourse should be aborted is not quite so hideous."