the recent cases you are referring to are night and day, apples and oranges. Hell its apples and coconuts. they arent even in the same galaxy as law, rights and precedence.
in the cases you are talkgin about it was a public access business breakign the law and illegal discriminating.
none of that fits the CHURCH and they church already does this every day.
SO yes on that one issue id have to label you a conspiracy theorist. If you can give me one, just ONE logical reason why you think it could happen ill but it.
2.) IMO i dont think its a rational concern, but i woulnd use it as a tool to deem one an irrational person in general, those are two very different things.
3.) me too and its something id fight for just as hard as equal right and thats the point. Equal rights for gays doesnt put freedom of religion in danger any more than anything else.
4.) nah you havent broken any laws or violated any rights
thats good because i didnt say that at all, not even close
i never said ZERO or referred to "life" and "way of thinking"
please focuse on what i said
the best citizens and politicians can separate their morals/religion from issues like these. Especially americans should be able to if they understand the country.
as in voting for equal rights
Last edited by Henrin; 10-18-13 at 12:23 AM.
if i think blacks, women and jews are evil, NO i should not vote based on that.
if they do they are completely ignorant hypocrites who totally dont get what this county is about.
2.) "influenced" yes
but should never be ruled by especially if the direction goes agaisnt the law, rights, freedom and constitution etc
3.) im sure they do but do those things violate the legal, human and civil rights of others? do they go against the law? do they empower bigotry and discrimination?
if so they are wrong too and should do it that way
4.) already given you what makes it valid or at least a general "guide" and it has nothing to do with me and you keep ignoring them.
laws, freedoms, rights, (human, legal and civil) the constitution etc. How do you even come to the conclusion it has to do with me? or its me deciding?
just because i think you think its possible for a church to be forced is illogical doesnt mean anything but that
You have a though that i think is illogical, so what, im sure you could say the same about me and even people you love/family? what does that mean?
why is this such an emotional thing for you? where do you think i am judging "you" at? and that its offensive?