I only support it for the poor and then, only on a very limited basis, with the exception of those who are permanently disabled or not mentally able to perform useful work. Otherwise, it should only be a short-term safety net that catches people when they fall and puts them back on their feet, whether they want it to or not.
I feel people on walfare that can work should take care of orther welfare children in childcare for that welfare check and others can do some jobs that don't need a lot of education for the gov. for their welfare check..at minium wages or for the wage that job demands...no illegal parents should not get anything from the government...the law should be changed that one parent must be a citizen of the united states for the child to be a citizen extremely simple and fair
It's absolute foolishness to think you can demand the state owe substance and well being to one group and not every other group. It's absolute foolishness to think the state will be generous and charitable towards one group and no one else. There is a reason the welfare state has never been limited to only those in the most need of assistance.
Last edited by Henrin; 10-14-13 at 05:51 PM.
Anti-Democracy advocate, Mixed government is the only good government
THE second point to be examined is, whether the [constitutional ]convention were authorized to frame and propose this mixed Constitution.
Some of all 3 is good. A minimal safety net is necessary. Some subsidies need to exist for products that create positive externalities. Some foreign is necessary, especially in unstable regions.
Most of all 3 needs to be cut.