- Joined
- Dec 22, 2012
- Messages
- 66,386
- Reaction score
- 22,119
- Location
- Portlandia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Have to once again throw the BS flag at you. The rental agency has you sign a rental agreement AND you have to use a credit card. The car rental agency gets the ticket, because it is the license plate not a facial recognition that identifies who gets the ticket. So the car rental folks charge your credit card PLUS a fee. (read your agreement)
You not being there in no way prevents a 'conviction', the owner of the vehicle is held responsible and like I said they just turn around and charge the card with which the car was rented.
Not on corporate rentals, I have NEVER been charged and have tossed those contractor tickets every time. Our contract is spelled out, no charges outside our agreement. You should learn the law before spouting off. Progressives love one size fits all, they just need to grow up and step outside the cubicle once in a while.
You have made up many of your facts before this is no surprise- NO rental agency would allow a blanket agreement like that. NO rental agency would just eat the fines and fees, and for that matter any damage done to the vehicle because it is 'corporate'.
Someone paid the tickets, they don't disappear. :roll:
CONs need to remember many of us have experience outside the cubicle, and some of us never spent a day in one.... :2wave:
they don't charge us for tickets, never have, never will. Progressives just do not understand how the world works, this is no surprise with their one size fits all mentality.:lamo
More CON BS. I'll tell you how the world works. :roll:
First 'they' would never send you the camera ticket, like you falsely claim (you tend to trap yourself in your BS), as 'they' have no way of knowing who was driving. 'They' will look up who the vehicle is registered to (the rental agency) and send them a ticket. The rental car place looks up who they billed and sends your corporation a bill which includes a fee. Corporate looks to see who drove the vehicle and that dummy pays the ticket PLUS the fee.
That is how Northrup-Grumman did it, a corporation you may have heard of????
So just like your claim there were only 3000 medical codes before ACA, you are once again shown to just make crap up. Your story went from 'I just throw the tickets away' to 'they don't charge us for tickets' :lamo
Your CON fu is very weak.
LOL...
If it has enough power...
More CON BS. I'll tell you how the world works. :roll:
First 'they' would never send you the camera ticket, like you falsely claim (you tend to trap yourself in your BS), as 'they' have no way of knowing who was driving. 'They' will look up who the vehicle is registered to (the rental agency) and send them a ticket. The rental car place looks up who they billed and sends your corporation a bill which includes a fee. Corporate looks to see who drove the vehicle and that dummy pays the ticket PLUS the fee.
That is how Northrup-Grumman did it, a corporation you may have heard of????
So just like your claim there were only 3000 medical codes before ACA, you are once again shown to just make crap up. Your story went from 'I just throw the tickets away' to 'they don't charge us for tickets' :lamo
Your CON fu is very weak.
Have to once again throw the BS flag at you. The rental agency has you sign a rental agreement AND you have to use a credit card. The car rental agency gets the ticket, because it is the license plate not a facial recognition that identifies who gets the ticket. So the car rental folks charge your credit card PLUS a fee. (read your agreement)
You not being there in no way prevents a 'conviction', the owner of the vehicle is held responsible and like I said they just turn around and charge the card with which the car was rented.
When I as there we were travelling at about 120 till we got to the speed cameras, in Belgium the speed limit was 130 which I think is much more reasonable. You are also right next door to the Autobahn and the Germans are fine.
Due to congestion the maximum speed around Amsterdam is a max of 100 KMH. Which is fine compared to the number of off and on ramps you have in that area, the traffic congestion in and around Amsterdam and the health of all those that live in Amsterdam.
The 100kmh is also because of the sound level of speeding traffic through a heavily built up area, CO2 levels and also very important particulates in the air which endanger the maximum levels that have been agreed upon in Europe.
In large parts of the Netherlands you can drive 120khm (75mph) and on parts of our roadway system it is 130kmh (80,7mph). Only in and around major cities you will have to drive at a lower speed. In Belgium the maximum speed is also 120kmh.
You can speed on a moped?
I distinctly remember 130 signs on the highway. I also remember crossing the border form Germany in the middle of nowhere and it got reduced form none to 100.
I just checked it for Belgium and I live about 10 miles from Belgium and there the speed limit on the highway was and is 120. I regularly drove on Belgian highways.
Mostly in the Netherlands you only have 100kmh near heavily built up areas, in most of the Netherlands you can drive 120 or 130.
Miles per hour or kilometers per hour?
It is Europe so it is all in KMH.