View Poll Results: Abolish Traffic Enforcement Cameras

Voters
101. You may not vote on this poll
  • All cameras should be abolished

    50 49.50%
  • Abolish red light cameras only

    5 4.95%
  • Abolish speeding cameras only

    7 6.93%
  • Abolish other types of cameras only (specify)

    0 0%
  • Allow all cameras to remain in use

    28 27.72%
  • Other (specify)

    11 10.89%
Page 15 of 47 FirstFirst ... 5131415161725 ... LastLast
Results 141 to 150 of 466

Thread: Abolish Traffic Enforcement Cameras

  1. #141
    Dungeon Master
    Veni, vidi, dormivi!

    spud_meister's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Didjabringabeeralong
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    33,874
    Blog Entries
    8

    Re: Abolish Traffic Enforcement Cameras

    Quote Originally Posted by TurtleDude View Post
    nope not in most cases. 80 through a school zone-probably

    70 in a 55 on an interstate not at all

    45 in a 35 at certain times of day-not at all

    the stuff that constitutes depraved indifference can be charged as reckless driving.
    So what if you drunk drive safely?
    So follow me into the desert
    As desperate as you are
    Where the moon is glued to a picture of heaven
    And all the little pigs have God

  2. #142
    Phonetic Mnemonic
    radcen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Look to your right... I'm that guy.
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:05 AM
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    33,413

    Re: Abolish Traffic Enforcement Cameras

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Blaylock View Post
    I think there's a bigger issue than that.

    Laws are supposed to be for the benefit of the people. We enact laws, and set up mechanism to enforce them, in the hopes that people will obey these laws, and by doing so, create a safer, more orderly society in which everyone's rights and everyone's legitimate interests are protected.

    Here, we have a situation where laws and enforcement mechanisms are set up in the hope that people will be caught violating them, so that government can use this as an excuse to fine them. The profit is motive, not safety or order. For government to take part in this sort of practice is pure corruption.
    I agree with everything you say here. That particular post of mine was just narrowly tailored to address the post I was responding to.
    If you claim sexual harassment to be wrong, yet you defend anyone on your side for any reason,
    then you are a hypocrite and everything you say on the matter is just babble.

  3. #143
    warrior of the wetlands
    TurtleDude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:23 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    180,658

    Re: Abolish Traffic Enforcement Cameras

    Quote Originally Posted by spud_meister View Post
    So what if you drunk drive safely?
    Not going to play that game. The highways in this country were designed to safely handle 70 MPH traffic. Decreasing speeds are based on revenue or in the time of Ford, "fuel conservation"



  4. #144
    Liberal Fascist For Life!


    Redress's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Georgia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 04:02 AM
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    93,316
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Abolish Traffic Enforcement Cameras

    Quote Originally Posted by TurtleDude View Post
    nope not in most cases. 80 through a school zone-probably

    70 in a 55 on an interstate not at all

    45 in a 35 at certain times of day-not at all

    the stuff that constitutes depraved indifference can be charged as reckless driving.
    Quote Originally Posted by TurtleDude View Post
    Not going to play that game. The highways in this country were designed to safely handle 70 MPH traffic. Decreasing speeds are based on revenue or in the time of Ford, "fuel conservation"
    The cameras being discussed are at intersections, not on the highway. As I linked to, they have been shown to be at least somewhat effective in reducing "T bone" accidents which are the ones most likely to cause injury and fatalities. They do this because people are less likely to speed up through yellow lights or push through a just turned red light. Does that influence your comments at all?
    We became a great nation not because we are a nation of cynics. We became a great nation because we are a nation of believers - Lindsey Graham

    Quote Originally Posted by Fiddytree View Post
    Uh oh Megyn...your vagina witchcraft is about ready to be exposed.

  5. #145
    Phonetic Mnemonic
    radcen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Look to your right... I'm that guy.
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:05 AM
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    33,413

    Re: Abolish Traffic Enforcement Cameras

    re: Which "causes" (for lack of a better word) more accidents?

    I don't doubt that red-light cameras cause more accidents in the form of rear-end collisions, but those tend to be less severe than the t-bone accidents that usually go down when the cameras are present.

    This is not unlike pit bull defenders pointing out that chihuahuas bite more people each year than pit bulls. Sure, that's true if all you're counting is the number of bites. But, the damage done by the pit bull is a whole different story.

    Sometimes making these defenses and comparisons are only valid on the surface, if even then. They completely fall apart upon closer inspection.
    If you claim sexual harassment to be wrong, yet you defend anyone on your side for any reason,
    then you are a hypocrite and everything you say on the matter is just babble.

  6. #146
    warrior of the wetlands
    TurtleDude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:23 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    180,658

    Re: Abolish Traffic Enforcement Cameras

    Quote Originally Posted by Redress View Post
    The cameras being discussed are at intersections, not on the highway. As I linked to, they have been shown to be at least somewhat effective in reducing "T bone" accidents which are the ones most likely to cause injury and fatalities. They do this because people are less likely to speed up through yellow lights or push through a just turned red light. Does that influence your comments at all?
    I was going on the poll. traffic enforcement cameras.

    I oppose all of the cameras based on the confrontation clause. as to deterrence-people who don't worry about being in an accident are going to worry about a ticket?



  7. #147
    Liberal Fascist For Life!


    Redress's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Georgia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 04:02 AM
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    93,316
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Abolish Traffic Enforcement Cameras

    Quote Originally Posted by TurtleDude View Post
    I was going on the poll. traffic enforcement cameras.

    I oppose all of the cameras based on the confrontation clause. as to deterrence-people who don't worry about being in an accident are going to worry about a ticket?
    Apparently, yes, that is what the research shows.
    We became a great nation not because we are a nation of cynics. We became a great nation because we are a nation of believers - Lindsey Graham

    Quote Originally Posted by Fiddytree View Post
    Uh oh Megyn...your vagina witchcraft is about ready to be exposed.

  8. #148
    warrior of the wetlands
    TurtleDude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:23 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    180,658

    Re: Abolish Traffic Enforcement Cameras

    Quote Originally Posted by Redress View Post
    Apparently, yes, that is what the research shows.
    that doesn't influence my position

    I oppose traffic enforcement cameras



  9. #149
    Sporadic insanity normal.


    The Mark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:43 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    19,736

    Re: Abolish Traffic Enforcement Cameras

    Quote Originally Posted by Hatuey View Post
    Where would drunk driving fit under these?
    I sometimes wonder about such laws, actually.

    Laws against texting while driving, drinking while driving, cell phone use while driving....etc.
    Or laws against smoking in public places. Laws against jaywalking. Laws against any number of other behaviors.


    All of them seem, in a way, redundant. They're designed to add extra penalties to certain behaviors to dissuade people from doing them.

    But driving drunk could fall under any number of other laws. Attempted murder, perhaps. Or other stuff. I dunno the exact laws...
    Speeding beyond a certain point would fall under the same laws, in general. Also texting or cell-phone use while driving.

    Why are there so many laws that are so damned specific?
    Education.

    Sometimes I think we're alone. Sometimes I think we're not. In either case, the thought is staggering. ~ R. Buckminster Fuller

  10. #150
    Sage
    Phys251's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Georgia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:39 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Liberal
    Posts
    12,746

    Re: Abolish Traffic Enforcement Cameras

    Quote Originally Posted by radcen View Post
    Shouldn't those who claim to honor the intent of our system of due process also properly follow the law instead of seeking ways around it?
    Two wrongs don't make a right.
    "A man you can bait with a tweet is not a man we can trust with nuclear weapons." --Hillary Rodham Clinton
    "Innocent until proven guilty is for criminal convictions, not elections." --Mitt Romney

Page 15 of 47 FirstFirst ... 5131415161725 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •