I care not what you believe.
Funny, as that is what a person with a low IQ says.
It is also what someone who would lie about their actual IQ would say as well.
And it wasn't really that fast.
You have tried to be insulting towards my age, and now towards my intelligence.
It is an appropriate reply to quell you asinine juvenile antics.
And yes. I did see the IQ thread.
I do not believe you one bit.
Your responses here, and your displayed inability to reason are not indicative of one who has a high IQ as you profess.
You don't say?
Please, do go on, and on, and on.... Really, push on, or stop with your juvenile antics.
Still not paying attention to what has been said huh?
To what was that said in response?
I did tell you I was going to respond in kind. Did I not?
Absolutely that is a sure thing scooter.
You just complained about it above.
As I already stated.
that is throwing them back in your face.
It points out how juvenile you are being, and leaves no mistake how your own words are meant to be taken.
And make no mistake, I am going to continue to do it.
If you don't like it, your best bet is act like an adult and not throw them out there to begin with.
Yet you continue on with your juvenile antics.
Act like an adult and stop throwing them out there. You will get none in reply.
It is very simply.
Yes you are still showing you are
It is a well known fact that the act of killing is not murder without a law making it so.
Yeah it is. Quoted even.
And that is not the only time.
Your argument is what is pathetic as Columbus's action were not illegal and therefore not Murder.
What you said has absolutely nothing to do with the legality of his actions.
He was allowed to do as he did.
Wrong again.
You even have your arguments messed up.
Not illegal period.
It wasn't murder.
It was killing.
He was allowed to do what he did.
That is the distinction that you fail to make.
No you obviously don't get it.
I have shown he declared war. The information provided said that he was
allowed to do so.
You haven't shown that he wasn't allowed, so you have failed.
Your analogy isn't relevant to any point you are trying to make that is because you are assuming something that you do not know.
Showing you are confused again.
This does not support any of your claims.
Your analogy failed.
Did you have trouble understanding what you quoted?
Do you not know how to stay in context?
In context your reply is nonsense.
Yeah routinely above 160. But it doesn't appear that you even reach 110.
You clearly display a lack of reasoning.
Back to the claim.
You have yet to provide any proof that it wasn't a "real war." Not Vietnam, Do'h!
as your analogy fails. But the war Columbus was allowed to declare.
You keep trying to doge the question.
That is because you can't show he wasn't allowed to do so.
No. :naughty
You are the only one shooting themselves in the foot, and mouth.
There is no hence.
The only equivalency between them is that they were both allowed to do as they did.
It was legal.
Wrong!
Absurdly wrong.
He was there to conquer.
No, they broke their conquerors laws.
Like you said
(if true);
"There were no murder laws against Natives."
You are not distinguishing anything.
He was allowed to do as he did. Therefore is was not murder.
Which is again why the Truman comparison is apt.
Under today's laws
doing what you are allowed to do is legal and not murder.
As presented, you have no clue as to what you have argued. So yeah, it is brilliant analysis.
Delusional?
Ha. The delusion is all yours.
Are you saying it isn't true?
Are you saying that you don't call abortion murder, when it is not.
Which is the same thing here, you are calling legal killing murder, and it just isn't.
Your actions and assertions here are what have been delusional.
Oy Vey!
:naughty
This is again your failure... to reason.
Your argument that laws are subjective is also a great argument for keeping separate but equal as a law as well.
Duh!
No, Laws are not subjective. They are the Law.
And are supposed to be black and white without and any vagueness.
Which would be objective.
How they come to be a law is what is subjective.