When people toss out their IQ's so fast that is generally a sure fire indication that they are full of ****. Even if it is true there is more critical thinking, recognition, humility, etc than a person's IQ
And you just called me childish. Doesn't the one wanting to alter a behaviour model what they constitute appropriate behaviour?
Sure thing scooter...For heavens sah-keh.
I said I parroted them back to you as they apply to you far more than they apply to me.
And yes that is throwing them back in your face.
It points out how juvenile you are being, and leaves no mistake how your own words are meant to be taken.
And make no mistake, I am going to continue to do it.
If you don't like it, your best bet is act like an adult and not throw them out there to begin with.
Still confused...We know you are, but you shouldn't be confused on that issue at all. Killing is not murder.
That is not what I said...Said the guy who said he wasn't arguing that it was.
Figures. I knew you didn't know what you were arguing.
Laws are based off of a societies morals. There have been murder laws since the Code of Hammurabi in ancient Mesopotamia. Really, you argument is pathetic.Wrong.
You don't get it.
Killing like that has not always been murder.
Not Murder under US Legal Code to Columbus as it was not written yet and as argued by you.This looks like it would be a great signature.
Bodhisattva ~ "I didn't argue that it was murder"
Bodhisattva ~ "I have been arguing that it is murder all along. "
Yes Murder as in the immoral killing of other humans that has been recognized probably since cave men chilled back in the day...
So no state sponsored declaration of war was declared. Got it. You lost. And worse, you fail to see the analogy I provided.First of all, this is your failure.
I stated that "He declared war", which is clearly supported by the information I provided.
That information states that the "King Ferdinand ... gave him anything he needed to break and conquer the natives."
Wtf do you think that means? Huh? Conquer. Is this another word you need explained to you?
When the report stated that "his demands were met with surprising defiance which allowed him to then declare war" what the heck do you think "allowed him to declare war means?
US Constitution. "Congress shall have power to ... declare War". Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution.You are the one assuming and alleging that he needed the Queens approval. That is on you to support. So please provide proof of it.
I supported what I said. It is now up to you to support what you say.
But I know you wont.
Because you failed to support any of your claims that you have been asked to thus far.
Who siad it was illegal? I said it was an undeclared war. "The Vietnam War was not a declared war... " 160 my ass... you are so full of crap.Your understanding is what is ****ed up.
As with the Presidents during the Vietnam Conflict, he had the authority to act in such a way.
It wasn't illegal.
They had to create the War Powers Act to reign in Nixon after they repealed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution back in '71 or '72.
Hence the undeclared war. You just love shooting yourself in the foot, don't you? That is not a crack at your disability status, BTW.Nor do our laws of today apply to yesterday. Or did you not know that?
Without declaring war he was really an illegal immigrant...More confusion on your part. As a conquer, he was not.
I am distinguishing between your "today it's murder and before it wasn't". And initially he was a visitor attempting to get to India. He broke their laws, undoubtedly.Yes you are.
Murder is an illegal act.
You can't call a legal killing murder.
And looky there. Here you are contradicting yourself again.
Keep up the brilliant analysis...You have no clue as what you have been arguing.
You are bringing up abortion? WTF? Yeah, I think I will drop it as you are clearly delusional... wish I had seen this last part before I wasted my time above.I think I understand what the problem is.
If you concede that simply killing is not murder, then your position that killing the unborn is murder falls.
I would suggest we drop the discussion if this is the case, because I am not wrong, and you could never show that you aren't.