Calling you skippy, or whatever, could be seen as juvenile but is not decidely so.Oy Vey!
You started by using that juvenile crap in the first place.
As I stated, I will throw that crap back in a person's face when given.
And I did just that, which was a win-win for me because it applied to what you said, and not to what I had said.
Having you parrot back skippy is not throwing crap back in my face... it is ****ing retarded. THAT, is juvenile.
Did I say that or did I say; "He declared war on them."
I am sure I know which one.
Care to correct yourself?
Let me catch my breath. Killing is not murder because there was literally no legal code for killing with regards to Natives but declaring war on them does not mean literally declaring war? Is that what you are gonna try and claim?
So his war was like Vietnam? Not a real war? You are a vet but don't know what declaring war means? Isn't that boot camp 101 or something?And those slave were the spoils of war.On his second trip to Haiti, King Ferdinand replenished his resources and gave him anything he needed to break and conquer the natives. Once he and his crew made it to the island, his demands were met with surprising defiance which allowed him to then declare war on the Arawak tribe; an almost obvious plan. Using vicious and inhumane fighting tactics, Columbus and his Spaniards won the battle. With no luck finding the gold on this trip either, he rounded up approximately 500 Arawak Indians to bring to Spain as slaves and gathered 500 more for the new Spanish government of Haiti to use in the same barbaric manner. They had conquered the Arawak Indians and now declared that Haiti belonged to Spain.
Christopher Columbus the Barbarian
It is the way things were.
If you don't like it, that is fine, but it totally different from it being murder or illegal.
An apple was an apple prior to the English word for it.Bs! You are wrong and even more wrong.
Just like you said you weren't arguing it was murder (which as I showed to be false), you also argued the legality of it.
I swear, you do not know what the hell you are arguing.
You arguing legality is right there in what I quoted to prove you wrong that you were arguing that it was murder.
Why don't you just finish this by saying that your real position is you just don't like what he did.
I can't argue against that as it is just an opinion.
But keep claiming false facts like it was murder when it wasn't, and I will continue to argue against them.
A murder was a murder prior to the English legal code describing it as so.
It can't be any more simple than that.