It's a really long read, be patient and thank you.
]Peter Dale Scott: The Pseudo-War on Terror: How the US Has Protected Some of Its Enemies[/SIZE] [/SIZE]
[SIZE=7]The Pseudo- War on Terror: How the US Has Protected Some of Its Enemies "SIZE] Peter Dale Scott: The Pseudo-War on Terror: How the US Has Protected Some of Its Enemies
"In the course of writing this essay, I came to another disturbing conclusion I had not anticipated. This is that a central feature of the protection has been to defend the 9/11 Commission’s false picture of al-Qaeda as an example of non-state terrorism, at odds with not just the CIA but also the royal families of Saudi Arabia and Qatar. In reality, as I shall show, royal family protection from Qatar and Saudi Arabia (concealed by the 9/11 Commission) was repeatedly given to key figures like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the alleged “principal architect of the 9/11 attacks.”[/
Who's side is the USA on in the Terror War?
Are the Saudis the big time exporters of terror?
Does the CIA really represent the people?
Does this explain our support of Al Queda types in Syria?
This essay is well documented and seems accurate and truthful. Is this disturbing?