Page 8 of 15 FirstFirst ... 678910 ... LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 147

Thread: Ruth Bader Ginsberg predicts another Dem in the White House. Do you Agree?

  1. #71
    Sage
    Oftencold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    A small village in Alaska
    Last Seen
    05-09-14 @ 12:53 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    5,044

    Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg predicts another Dem in the White House. Do you Agree?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mithros View Post
    No they don't. Rush, Glen, and Hannity thrive on ignorance, fear, and sensationalism.
    I'd ask you to back that up with some sort of rationale. Myself, I find it a little hard to think that people who constantly refer to history, scholarly writing's and encourage their audiences to educate themselves thrive on ignorance.

    On the other hand, the left tells us that if we don't surrender our wealth and freedom to them, the ocean will engulf us while we broil. Or that without silly school feeding programs, hapless mother would watch their children waste away and never understand why.
    Quod scripsi, scripsi

  2. #72
    Sage
    Oftencold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    A small village in Alaska
    Last Seen
    05-09-14 @ 12:53 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    5,044

    Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg predicts another Dem in the White House. Do you Agree?

    Quote Originally Posted by Wiseone View Post
    There has never been a more appropriate moment for this image anywhere on the internet

    As I take pains to frequently point out, in simple sentences composed of short words, my positions are beyond the ability of the Common Leftist to rebut rationally. They are left to mock their cognitive betters.

    (Stylistic advice: When one quite correctly points out that one's opinions are informed by Cruel Reality, it is generally an unfortunate choice to attempt to counter that assertion with the use of a cartoon fantasy. Heeding this advice may help the attentive student avoid further embarrassment.)

    Carry on.
    Quod scripsi, scripsi

  3. #73
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Ft. Campbell, KY
    Last Seen
    12-31-14 @ 08:37 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    12,177

    Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg predicts another Dem in the White House. Do you Agree?

    Quote Originally Posted by Oftencold View Post
    As I take pains to frequently point out, in simple sentences composed of short words, my positions are beyond the ability of the Common Leftist to rebut rationally. They are left to mock their cognitive betters.

    (Stylistic advice: When one quite correctly points out that one's opinions are informed by Cruel Reality, it is generally an unfortunate choice to attempt to counter that assertion with the use of a cartoon fantasy. Heeding this advice may help the attentive student avoid further embarrassment.)

    Carry on.
    I don't respect you enough to care about attempting to counter your assertions, I just think what you said was funny as hell.

  4. #74
    Student
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Central Jersey
    Last Seen
    10-15-13 @ 03:26 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    256

    Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg predicts another Dem in the White House. Do you Agree?

    Quote Originally Posted by Oftencold View Post
    1. Yes. Corporations are people, just like any church, club political party or other amalgamation of human beings.

    2. Money is private property. Speech, especially political speech is to be unencumbered. Thus the {People should be free to use their money in the exercise of the free speech as thy see fit with little or no government interference and with virtually no liitis.

    One should loot to how one shepherds one's own funds, not how one's neighbor manages his. In any event, the proper way to guarantee that one's speech has the widest audience available, is to create a compelling message.

    3. There were every legal and moral to stop repeated "Florida Recounts." The Florida vote was conducted under the auspices of the Florida Constitution, not the dreams of the Political Left. That document de manded that the nonsense cease by a given date. The Federal Courts had no right to intervene. People who assert otherwise have rejected the rule of law.
    1. An amalgamation of human beings is not a person, and does not have the rights of a person.

    2. Money is not speech. If it is, then that means one person has more speech than another -- and that is unconstitutional. You cannot say "Money is speech" and claim to be a "constitutionalist," because you would be flat-out lying.

    3. The Florida vote was never fully counted. By denying thousands of people the right to vote, the U.S. Supreme Court was violating the 15th and 19th Amendments. Essentially, they were denying over 300 million people the right to vote, Bush voters as well as Gore voters. They were saying, "We know how Rehnquist, Scalia and Thomas are going to vote: For Bush. We know how Stevens, Souther, Ginsburg and Breyer are going to vote: For Gore. So the only two Americans who really have the right to vote in this election are O'Connor and Kennedy." The federal Constitution was being violated, therefore the Supreme Court had the duty to say, "This recount will continue until every vote is counted."

  5. #75
    Sage
    Oftencold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    A small village in Alaska
    Last Seen
    05-09-14 @ 12:53 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    5,044

    Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg predicts another Dem in the White House. Do you Agree?

    Quote Originally Posted by Wiseone View Post
    I don't respect you enough to care about attempting to counter your assertions, I just think what you said was funny as hell.
    And yet, you seem to feel compelled to make hollow, vapid responses signifying nothing other that reflexive rejection of concepts and forms of discourse which cause you distress. Do you see the intrinsic sadness with which that activity is freighted?
    Quod scripsi, scripsi

  6. #76
    Student
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Central Jersey
    Last Seen
    10-15-13 @ 03:26 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    256

    Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg predicts another Dem in the White House. Do you Agree?

    You don't know what the hell "socialism" is. These people do, and they know Obama is no socialist: What Do Socialists Think of Obamacare? | Michael Smerconish

    Quote Originally Posted by Ontologuy View Post
    Your linked author's opinion is merely that, employing hyperbole and metaphor to make his point.

    The socialist aspect of Obamacare is obvious.
    Did you even READ the article? There was no hyperbole. There was no metaphor. Only actual Socialists explaining how ObamaCare is NOT socialist.

    Either you didn't read the article, or you choose not to accept the truth. Either way, you are ignorant. And ignorance is a choice, and it is a deviant, perverse, repulsive lifestyle.

  7. #77
    Guru

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Last Seen
    12-15-17 @ 02:51 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    2,671

    Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg predicts another Dem in the White House. Do you Agree?

    Quote Originally Posted by Oftencold View Post
    As I take pains to frequently point out, in simple sentences composed of short words, my positions are beyond the ability of the Common Leftist to rebut rationally. They are left to mock their cognitive betters.

    (Stylistic advice: When one quite correctly points out that one's opinions are informed by Cruel Reality, it is generally an unfortunate choice to attempt to counter that assertion with the use of a cartoon fantasy. Heeding this advice may help the attentive student avoid further embarrassment.)

    Carry on.

  8. #78
    Student
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Central Jersey
    Last Seen
    10-15-13 @ 03:26 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    256

    Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg predicts another Dem in the White House. Do you Agree?

    Liberal Democratic candidates make it better every time. Every. Single. Time. Conservative Republican candidates make it worse every time.

    Quote Originally Posted by clownboy View Post
    And yet you just posted this above: "The truth is, this country has never had a Left President."

    That would mean I suppose that every president from the beginning has made things worse in your opinion. Silly extremism.
    No. That means that liberals are not in "the Left." They are left of center, but you people consider everybody to the left of your perception of Reagan (including the actual Reagan, if you looked at some parts of his record) to be Communists.

  9. #79
    Sage
    Ontologuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:59 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    5,516

    Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg predicts another Dem in the White House. Do you Agree?

    Quote Originally Posted by Comunitee View Post
    Bull. Liberal Democratic candidates make it better every time.

    Every. Single. Time.

    Conservative Republican candidates make it worse every time.
    Your post here is not only in error (your first and second lines) but a disconnect reflecting liberal extremism dualistic thinking (either a liberal Dem or a conservative Repub - no possibility of any other).

    I've already presented the other choice, a centrist candidate, neither liberal or conservative, with the traits and policy my first post in this thread presented.
    You don't trust Trump? Well, there's only one way to leverage him to do what's economically right for us all: Powerful American Political Alliance. Got courage?! .. and a mere $5.00?

  10. #80
    Student
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Central Jersey
    Last Seen
    10-15-13 @ 03:26 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    256

    Re: Ruth Bader Ginsberg predicts another Dem in the White House. Do you Agree?

    If you think president obama is part of "the left," then you don't have the slightest understanding of politics. The actual left considers him a conservative.

    Quote Originally Posted by Oftencold View Post
    roflol!

    You went to the Public Schools, didn't you?
    You're damn right I did. My parents knew that if they wanted me to have religious instruction, it had to be in the church, where it was free, and not at a school where hustlers in collars indoctrinate children for profit.

Page 8 of 15 FirstFirst ... 678910 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •