yes, only property owners should vote
no, let everyone vote
This is what a poor person looks like for most of humanity:
This is what a "poor" person looks like in America:
You'll notice about a 100lb difference.
Last edited by cpwill; 09-25-13 at 09:12 PM.
“If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures.”
- Alexander Hamilton. Spiritual father of #NeverTrump
As for the aristocracy you mention...I would agree. I'm against another Bush running or another Clinton, or Reagan, or Obama. That's more of an influence thing than it is a money thing I would say.
I only hope that I can generate enough wealth and connections for my children to benefit from and eventually inherit. What they do with it is up to them.
Everyone has the right to vote (with the REASONABLE restrictions we have in place now), and that isn't going to change. It's a right, just like the 2nd amendment or any other of your "favorite" rights.
Your point? The opinions of fools doesn't change the fact that they can't control the body of someone else.The South says otherwise. As did the Spartans who ran their economy on slaves. Rome too.
They did not and could not have mastery over another person.That depends on how you define "own" and to which your argument will go to insane lengths to justify how it's not totally wrong.
He who knows the least obeys the best.
"If your opponent is of choleric temperament, seek to irritate him." - Sun Tzu