yes, only property owners should vote
no, let everyone vote
There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs.... John Rogers
How do we determine the difference between a "tax consumer" and a "net taxpayer"?
Is it solely money-in vs money-out?
How about services used? Even unseen services. A person engaging in international business may benefit from government programs and services that make their international endeavors possible, and without which would be virtually impossible.
If, when defending your support for Donald Trump, and your response is,
"But but but... HILLARY!!!", then you lost the argument before you even began.
It always amuses me when self describe patriots clearly dispose everything that America actually stands for. This country is about freedom and equality for everyone, not just for a privileged few.
Liberté. Égalité. Fraternité.
given the poll has less than 4% like restricting voting to 'net givers' I'd say epic fail.
Perhaps in national elections we could use the net return on money sent to the feds. Any state which receives more back from DC then they sent in should be barred from national elections.
It's WE the people, not ME the people.... every state that takes more of other people's money in and simultaneously thumbs their collective nose should have a voter timeout. For that matter any federal projects should be awarded to out of state contractors, employing out of state workers. At least the negative return states can have the temp housing and food crumbs from the projects... perhaps we can go so far as increasing the onpost facilities of major military bases so the personnel have little need to spend federal money in the local economy.