Yes, but only during the first 20 weeks, same as a woman.
Yes, but only during the initial period when a non-invasive technique works.
No, but he should have the right to be legally relieved of all responsibility.
NO! Only the woman has this right and he remains responsible.
I oppose all abortion, so neither have the right.
I Don't Know.
Your argument is based on the fictional "fact" that financial responsibility gets "foisted" on the male
It doesn't. Both parents are financially responsible for raising their child.
Being held financially responsible for supporting ones' own child is not enslavement and it is not unfair in any way.
Anyway, it doesn't matter. If she makes the decision alone, without the consent of the man, then she has no right to expect him to pay for it. It wasn't his call.
Sure is. You're pro-choice, aren't you? Do you want to ban adopting out, and abortion? No? Then you do indeed think that would be enslavement... when it comes to the woman.
But for some reason, men don't get that consideration.
Actually Roe vs. Wade was mostly about Doctor's rights.
Essay - Doctor Recalls Abortion Complications Before Roe v. Wade - NYTimes.com
It is important to remember that Roe v. Wade did not mean that abortions could be performed. They have always been done, dating from ancient Greek days.
What Roe said was that ending a pregnancy could be carried out by medical personnel, in a medically accepted setting, thus conferring on women, finally, the full rights of first-class citizens — and freeing their doctors to treat them as such.
He doesn't pay for the child. Both parents pay for the child.Anyway, it doesn't matter. If she makes the decision alone, without the consent of the man, then she has no right to expect him to pay for it. It wasn't his call.
The laws requiring parents to support their child are not "enslavement"Sure is. You're pro-choice, aren't you? Do you want to ban adopting out, and abortion? No? Then you do indeed think that would be enslavement... when it comes to the woman.
The fact that your argument requires so many distortions of fact proves how wrong your position is
No, Roe vs Wade is about doctors rights and the right to privacy regarding reproductivity.
If the woman and man have a good relationship the woman will include the man on major decisions regarding a pregnancy.
"He who does not think himself worth saving from poverty and ignorance by his own efforts, will hardly be thought worth the efforts of anybody else." -- Frederick Douglass, Self-Made Men (1872)