Yes, but only during the first 20 weeks, same as a woman.
Yes, but only during the initial period when a non-invasive technique works.
No, but he should have the right to be legally relieved of all responsibility.
NO! Only the woman has this right and he remains responsible.
I oppose all abortion, so neither have the right.
I Don't Know.
We know that human sexual behaviors...are what they are.
Unintended consequences happen as a result of a sexual event...even when contraceptives are used. People aren't going to stop having sex. Unintended consequences are inevitable.
You know yourself that sex is perform many, many, many more times for pleasure than for procreate. That's not going to stop. Let's work within the confines of reality.
So...what would be a course of action OTHER THAN keeping peckers in pants and legs closed? Can we somehow strive to create better preventions of conceptions through technology, for instance?
Anti-Democracy advocate, Mixed government is the only good government
THE second point to be examined is, whether the [constitutional ]convention were authorized to frame and propose this mixed Constitution.
If it were me, there would have been a "car accident" where I was driving and she was wearing her seat belt. The force of the collision would have caused a miscarriage and "it was a car accident" would have white-washed 99% of my motive away. Instead of over thinking the whole thing, I probably would have looked for a target of opportunity in normal driving.
Even if she thought it was on purpose, good luck proving it in court.