I agree what that. I am not saying he is innocent. The op question was about whether or not a man should have the right to choose. Women are the only ones who have that right. Their decision is the sole seat of the power in this circumstance. If she wants to have the baby, she can choose to do so, with our without his consent. If she chooses to abort, she can do so, with or without his consent. The question is, in a circumstance where she insists on having the baby, against his wishes, does he, or should he, have any rights? According to your logic, and that of a few other posters, the man has zero rights, although he shares half the responsibility, which is solely dependent upon the whims of the woman.