It's going to change?? Men are going to start carries the fetus?
How cute, you pretending like you can't follow along.
Like you do not know that the one word answer of "wrong" was directed to your absurdity.
And yes, it is going to change.
So lets provide the exchange to show everybody how absurd you are being by pretending you can't follow along.
And again, if the man doesn't want the burden, he had his chance to back out of the deal.
Only if we give him the same choice she has and not let her burden him with her choice.
Which will be the case when he carries a fetus.
Wrong!
It is unfair as it is and it is going to change. It is nothing more than a matter of time.
:naughty
No, your position that consensual sex is somehow consent to have a child, is what is deluded.
Especially if either one are using contraceptives.
Consent to have sex is not consent to have a child.
You're deluded, nothing is going to change.
Wrong! The change has already been noted in this forum alone.
It is just a matter of time.
You are deluded to think otherwise.
Men are not going to get pregnant ...
You are the only one squawking such absurdities.
men are not going to get the option to evade their financial responsibilities.
How little you know.
This isn't an evasion. This is about choice.
Those who want it will take on the responsibility, those who don't, wont have to, as there would be no responsibility to take it on.
Presently, the only responsibilities that exist, are those that were artificially created.
Created before women had the choice.
Just as they were artificially created, they can be undone.
Especially to come into line of the decision to give women that choice.
That is called progress, which I am sure you are aware of.
You're only chance is that abortion will be outlawed, but aside from being highly unlikely, you will never be able to prevent a woman from aborting a fetus she doesn't want.
Where do you come up with this ****?
Are you confused? Or is this just more of your convoluted and delusional thoughts?
Hell, it is like you do not even know what is being argued.
No one has argued such.
You ought to coordinate a march in Washington ... the Million Deadbeat March!
You clearly are seriously confused as to what is being discussed.
A ZEF is never a clump. Its an organism. They're not the same. An organism is structured, a mass or clump is not.
Wrong.
In the beginning, it is a clump. Also known as a mass.
As already shown.
When the law debases its own authority it is void. Killing has to be justified. Not rationalised, justified, as in that person was an iminent threat to you. Whenever a killing is not justified, it is murder regardles of what the law says.
This may come as a suprise to some people but the law can be wrong.
Sorry, you are still wrong.
A justification is nothing more than a rationalization for an action.
Since child support is a right of the child the courts will void your contract on the grounds that parents cannot sign away their child's rights.
Which is another thing that will change.
If the planet ever becomes overcrowded you can be damn sure that governments will start requiring abortions. Which really shows that what is best for the a clump of cells is subjective.