- Joined
- Jul 30, 2011
- Messages
- 11,593
- Reaction score
- 2,380
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Other
lulz....Ah, but if me you me actually did read the original post, you'd be wrong. Again.
Now that's ironic!
lulz....Ah, but if me you me actually did read the original post, you'd be wrong. Again.
Now that's ironic!
I suppose if one completely forgets
2001-2008, where having "dumb" people execute "dumb" policies which
has caused directly and indirectly much of the instability in the Middle East today.....then one could incorrectly define "Smart Power" and whine about the situation in the ME.
What depth of understanding and vision!
If you don't know the answer to the question, then be a man and admit it.No, you did not.
Nothing wrong with education but it is only one part of a resume to be pres not the end all be all.
It's precisely what Obama expected, so if a straw man has been created, you can thank him for it. Did he, or did he not say that he didn't create the red line - that the world did? He did. Just yesterday.Is that what is being called for?
A: No it isn't, so you have created a straw man.
This still makes no sense, "ProgLibs" never ignored the absolute disaster of the Bush Doctrine .....nor are those whining about the reintroduction of "Smart Power" claiming the "ProgLibs" are ignoring its application.
You make no sense on multiple levels.
I'm sorry. It's not my intent. It's apparent I can't reach down to your level of understanding.
Please forgive me.
He expected you to create a straw argument? really?It's precisely what Obama expected
You would have a point...if you showed my "misunderstanding"....but you didn't....instead you fell back to your comfortable SOP, diversion, insult and obfuscation.I'm sorry. It's not my intent. It's apparent I can't reach down to your level of understanding.
Please forgive me.
There's that. We like to hear good things, though. A good salesman or politician can get many to bite. Swallowing is another story. I've done a lot of structural engineering over the years. It's possible to hide structural deficiencies for a time, but they will always make themselves apparent eventually. It's just a matter of time.Were that true, Obama could never have been elected.
You would have a point...if you showed my "misunderstanding"....but you didn't....instead you fell back to your comfortable SOP, diversion, insult and obfuscation.
As I said, this is getting predictable.
Probably an extension of you misunderstanding the term "macro" when I used it, so you thought the best way to counter my argument was to reply with nonsensical posts that included insults....you know, SOP.Yes, the exchages do seem predictable. Why do you think that is?
Obama made his military strike announcement before he had any of our allies on board. Obama moved destroyers into the Med expecting others to join up. None have. Bonehead created his own problem, and now he's blaming the world for it. No strawman there. Just rank incompetence.He expected you to create a straw argument? really?
like everything else he's done for the past five years, sadly we all look silly right along with him?rank incompetence
It is funny how some talk about "boneheads" when they create strawmen about what the POTUS has said.Obama made his military strike announcement before he had any of our allies on board. Obama moved destroyers into the Med expecting others to join up. None have. Bonehead created his own problem, and now he's blaming the world for it. No strawman there. Just rank incompetence.
Probably an extension of you misunderstanding the term "macro" when I used it, so you thought the best way to counter my argument was to reply with nonsensical posts that included insults....you know, SOP.
Take it up with Obama. He's the one blaming the world for not joining him. Did you miss the news conference yesterday, or are you happy to ignore it. I'll tell ya, McCain, who's just dying to blow something up most of the time, was not in favor of "limited strikes" at the outset. Following a closed briefing on Tuesday, McCain came out saying he's on board because the president "is going big". He's even added a little more to the authorization coming out of committee in the Senate - about tilting the balance on the battlefield toward the rebels. Assad was winning. It'll take more than a pinprick to change that.It is funny how some talk about "boneheads" when they create strawmen about what the POTUS has said.
Any debate should address fact, not false conjecture. None in the WH called for " blow the living hell out of Syria". False rhetoric is for idiots.
Wow, you should try a different news source.Take it up with Obama. He's the one blaming the world for not joining him.
As another poster pointed out, "we" did elect the bonehead. Bonehead has a certain ring to it - like talking into an empty steel trash can.like everything else he's done for the past five years, sadly we all look silly right along with him?
Yeah, i think that is it...you admitted as much.No, that's not it. Can you think of any other reason?
Oh gawd, like you have not done the same in nearly every exchange between us, hypocrite much?I realize you've refered (sic) to me as ignorant,
Ocean...gee you are sensitivesalty,
A reference to clouding the discussion IS NOT a personal insult, FFS!and I muddy the water
Your arguments do not...AND I EXPLAINED WHY THEY DO NOT...and that is not a personal insult, live with it.make no sense,
Um, it is your "Standard operating procedure" in our debates.....was that really hard to understand?as well as many other names and accusations, but I'm struggling with the reason you claim the exchanges are predictable and SOP.