Iím against it
it violates the constitution and should be removed
I support this
it does NOT violate the constitution and should stand
itís NOT discrimination
itís NOT bigotry
Thanks for the link though im sure it will open some eyes.
with that siad what you posted is by no means any more or less despicable and disgusting to even go on here or be on the books whether it is actually practiced or not.
Well, I'm against it in the modern day. But unlike the blubbering few believe, this isn't about republicans or conservatives. You know at the time everyone thought Philly would be the capitol of our fledgling nation. But any slave entering Philly was freed so the legislators just couldn't have that (and Washington owned some useless swamp land he was eager to unload - DC). Why was that you ask - PA was the Quaker State.
I suppose the learning moment comes from the fact that despite such words in important laws and documents, most are no longer enforcible, which reflects the belief in equality among people that makes up society today.
That's not to say some don't make a living trying to keeps the idea of descirmination alive.
To her Wall Street owners: Hillary Clinton: ďBut if everybody's watching, you know, all of the back room discussions and the deals, you know, then people get a little nervous, to say the least. so, you need both a public and a private position.Ē - Hillary Clinton: "I'm kind of far removed from the struggles of the Middle Class"
It's blatant discrimination, and should be struck down.
If you build a man a fire, he'll be warm for a day.
If you set a man on fire, he'll be warm for the rest of his life.