Iím against it
it violates the constitution and should be removed
I support this
it does NOT violate the constitution and should stand
itís NOT discrimination
itís NOT bigotry
your mistake, and no need to thank me for pointing that fact out
Only if you don't understand the concept of religious freedom.By law it appears that a state can deny people the ability to hold an office if they are a person who is not willing to accept that God exists.
States don't have the right to create religious litmus tests.It's a state's rights issue, but I think it's wrong.
Torcaso v. Watkins - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaI'm against it, but I also don't think such a practice violates the current US Constitution
I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality. - MLK
I voted that it is discrimination, because atheism is just as much of a religion
as any of the others.
It takes just as much faith to believe in nothing, as to to believe in a Deity.
Atheism is the currently endorsed religion of the federal Government,
The endorsement of the religion of atheism over the other faiths, is what is unconstitutional.
Can't we just turn Congress off and then turn it back on again?
Although it makes me wonder why some atheists get caught up in all the stupid meaningless **** like not wanting religious images on public grounds when certain states don't let them hold public office or testify as a witness in court. The latter is actually something worth fighting for, the former...not so much.
I believe half of the things I say and say half of the things I believe.