BHO is not stupid, apdst. Everything he does is for a reason. He seems to enjoy testing boundaries, and going to the UN instead of Congress for an okay on Libya, as an example, showed him how far he could go. Unfortunately for him, this time the UN disagreed with him on Syria, and that's doubtless the reason the story changed, which explains all the talking heads out there telling us that we need to handle Syria for "national security" reasons. Say what? Syria? Really? They've got their own problems with warring factions in a religious war. The Mideast has never ever been peaceful, and we aren't going to change that. Getting involved is not in America's best interest, IMO, since we have our own problems, which are many.
Kerry just told Congress that there might be American "boots on the ground" in Syria. Why? It's not our fight! :thumbdown: Just because BHO made an unfortunate comment about "lines in the sand" doesn't mean we all have to agree. I understand your argument about looking weak, but we're not, and the world knows that! The riots in the 60s on VietNam was because the people did not agree with the POTUS, and we didn't lose prestige in the eyes of the world then. Today, Wal-Mart is stocked with goods made in VietNam, and the rest of the world buys them, too. Anyway, that is my opinion. You probably don't agree, and that's your right, but that is my opinion, for what it's worth.