I wasn't speaking of laws, I was speaking of guns.
Due process, that which is the basis of law, one forfeits certain rights when they abuse them to do harm. The right to life in a just system is the hardest to forfeit, but once life is abused by taking life without due cause, the forfeiture of such is on the table.
No, tell us who is fit to have a child, and raise a child?
Life unworthy of life eh? Interesting.
I'm neutral for the most part on the death penalty, however when someone says they killed because they were bored, I don't know how they can be salvaged.
That is true. For the most heinous of crimes, society should have a right to reserve a heinous punishment. Just my opinion.
That's how you read it? No, life misused to violate the first right, life.
For the most part that may be true, but are they incorporating this type of sociopathic behavior?
Life is a right? Even more interesting.
Well lay it all out for us. Who should be allowed to have and raise children? Should you need a permit, from the government?
What guns? There aren't any remember?
Make a case against it.
A government license to have children? It sounds familiar?
Nature already did.
fair enough Chris. The problem in this particular circumstance is that these kids killed for the only reason of relieving boredom. If certain factors such as "during commission of another crime" are present it could be reasoned that these teens were caught in a heat of the moment situation and didn't have the emotional maturity to assess the situation properly, problem here is they killed specifically to kill, I just don't know how that can be reconciled.
I never said it wouldn't take time, and flamethrowers.