My use of the word minority wasn't in regard to race but to numbers. The minority meaning the candidate that did not receive the popular vote but won the electoral vote.
I've done a bit of reading on the subject and many of the law professors and jurists are of the opinion that the NPV is riddled with constitutional perils and will result in a nightmare of litigation. Some of the issues they bring up are...
"Guarantee Clause" of Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution, which states that the "United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government."
"Compact Clause" in Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution, which provides that "No State shall, without the Consent of Congress ... enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State."
The NPV compact's reduction of the Electoral College to an empty shell would therefore thwart the intention of the Framers of the original Constitution and the framers of the Twelfth Amendment, which reformed the Electoral College in 1804, since the Constitution clearly contemplates that electoral votes will be cast by the states as states rather than by the states as collective or compacting entities.
And then there is the issue of those states who have banned together under the NVP versus those states (I believe 10 in all) who have rejected it, how is that going to result in a fair outcome of an election with States using two different methods?
Some have warned that the NPV compact might violate sections 2 and 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.