Yes, Soviet type of communism
Yes, community type of communism
Yes, religious type of communism
Yes, other type of communism
No, not possible
"He who does not think himself worth saving from poverty and ignorance by his own efforts, will hardly be thought worth the efforts of anybody else." -- Frederick Douglass, Self-Made Men (1872)
hutterites for example.
Although I agree the terms 'communism' and 'communalism' are somewhat messed up.
This kind of advocacy isn't really revolutionary. Many professors and public intellectuals (Gar Alperovitz, Richard Wolff, and Noam Chomsky, to name three you're probably familiar with) advocate for this kind of decentralized ownership. Alperovitz, in his case, has meticulously outlined the tens of millions of Americans involved in it today. And the point of going back to early property was to point out that private property isn't natural - it, in all it's wickedness, is a human institution. It was created by rulers, and should be abolished by subjects.
Tell me, what happens when a collective farm just so happens to be next to a river that a power plant "needs" to be on? Which family gets the boot? Which farm gets demolished to make way for "progress"? How is this solved without private property rules? Or take a mine, for example. A person wants to dig gold out of the ground in a particular place, and someone else wants to do the same thing on the same spot. How do you resolve this conflict?
"Political speech and writing are largely the defense of the indefensible. . . . Thus political language has to consist largely of euphemism, question-begging and sheer cloudy vagueness."
~Orwell, Politics and the English Language
and some of us are quite aware that hell hath no fury like a mistress scorned
you end up having to sleep with one eye open in fear she'll creep up and snip off yer dangly bits
no wonder they are so cranky
A group owning a firm doesn't change the fact that land is (often) owned.