• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Telecommunications Act of 1996: A mistake?

Telecommunications Act of 1996 a mistake?


  • Total voters
    2

Peter Grimm

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 13, 2011
Messages
10,348
Reaction score
2,426
Location
The anals of history
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
Until 1984, local governments kept cable prices in check. Then deregulation resulted in a torrent of price hikes, interrupted only by a brief period, 1993-1996, when rates were regulated.

The Telecommunications Act of 1996 opened the flood gates to deregulation and more price hikes. Since passage of the 1996 Act, cable rates have increased by 59 percent—almost three times the rate of inflation—according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

What say you? Was it a mistake? What should be done?


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecommunications_Act_of_1996
 
Last edited:
Yes and no. From what I have read on the law, the intentions were good, but the execution, accountability and transparency of the whole thing is ridden with corruption and corporatism.
 
The cable fees subsidize the other things they have gotten involved in since then like internet and land-line telephone service, and sometimes cell service. I don't like one service subsidizing another, but that seems to be the way it works.
 
If they change it they should also include a part that removes the FCC or limits it's power.
 
Back
Top Bottom