• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Does Religious Background Preclude Historical Objectivity?

Does it?


  • Total voters
    22
It can, it depends on why someone is delving into history. People will want to believe whatever supports their ideas. Atheists do this too, not just the religious. Remember when Zeitgeist and the Jesus/Horus/Mithra stuff was popular among anti-Christian bloggers? There will be Christians that want to attribute stuff that would seemingly support the Bible, Muslims may do so in regards to the Koran, and atheists may do so in an attempt to discredit or disprove a faith. Being a religious person or an atheist doesn't mean someone will not have an objective view on history, but it can contribute to them being selective with facts or believing lies/inaccurate info.
 
Well, when historians read creative writing prof Aslan's new book, their opinions will surely be both interesting and valuable.
 
Well, when historians read creative writing prof Aslan's new book, their opinions will surely be both interesting and valuable.

*Dr. Aslan :)

Look, if you think he's not qualified to make the claims, despite him having a Ph.D in Sociology with a focus in the history of religion, bring up a claim that you think is wrong and argue that he's wrong.

No one is going to agree that he claimed he was qualified as a history teacher when he said "history of religions"
 
It’s what Dr. Aslan claims about himself in the “cringe-inducing” Lauren Green interview that is at issue, at least for me. I haven’t read his new book and don’t plan to. But I did suffer through the entire Green interview and heard for myself Aslan’s claims. About these, Manuel Roig-Franzia of the Washington Post wrote yesterday:

[Aslan]…still seems to be calibrating his identity in small but telling ways. Even as he has achieved phenomenal success as the author of well-crafted religious history books that appeal to a mass audience, he’s eager — perhaps overeager — to present himself as a formidable academic with special bona fides in religion and history.

The boy who posed as something that he was not has become the man who boasts of academic laurels he does not have. Aslan, 41, has variously claimed to hold a doctorate in “the history of religions” or a doctorate in “the sociology of religions,” though no such degrees exist at the university he attended. His doctorate is in sociology, according to the registrar’s office at the University of California at Santa Barbara.

Reza Aslan: A Jesus scholar who’s hard to pin down - The Washington Post

As I’ve said, Aslan is an associate professor of creative writing. The WaPo article claims, “He has asserted a present-day toehold in the field of religion by saying he is “a cooperative faculty member” in Riverside’s Department of Religious Studies.” This is apparently untrue. Vivian-Lee Nyitray, the just-retired chair of the department, “says she discussed the possibility last year with Aslan but that he has not been invited to become a cooperative faculty member, a status that would allow him to chair dissertations in her former department.”

Aslan himself refers questions back to his grad advisor, Mark Juergensmeyer (UC Santa Barbara):

“We don’t have a degree in sociology of religions, as such,” Juergensmeyer acknowledges. But he says he doesn’t have a problem with Aslan’s characterization of his doctorate, noting that his former student did most of his course work in religion.

Juergensmeyer helped arrange the shift of Aslan’s doctoral dissertation on Jihadism from the religious studies department to sociology. Juergensmeyer says the shift was undertaken to get Aslan out of time-consuming required language courses; Aslan says he moved to another department because religious studies professors were jealous about the 2005 publication of his best-selling book No God, but God: The Origins, Evolution, and Future of Islam. Juergensmeyer did not recall resentment among professors being a factor.

Reza Aslan: A Jesus scholar who’s hard to pin down - The Washington Post

I agree with the Yale religious studies professor who reviewed Zealot and who praises Aslan’s writing talent, Dale Martin, that Aslan just “overplayed his hand” but that “The record needs to be corrected. Both about his credential and his thesis.”
 
I do not think than any man , writing anything, is free from influences.
Human nature - this can be controlled only to an extent.
I think that if the man is a writer first and a believer second, then the results should be good.
But, the writer has to know himself and be honest.
 
The interview is hilarious. "Why would you as a muslim be interested in the founder of christianity?" "Because it's my job..." The interviewer is a complete and total idiot.

I could not agree more..
A biased conservative interviewer will be this way.
 
Back
Top Bottom