Which revolved solely around his personal life. As a former Congressman, I'm sure he made many public appearances, dealt with many public issues. Those issues would have work related, and it is on those issues for which he should be judged. Judging him based on issues of his personal sex life is ridiculous.No, there is a very clear public element to it.
But it's still sex related. It still comes back to the issue of sex.Sending random women cock pics isn't simply sex, nor is it simply sexting.
I mean the response to the situation about his personal sex life, yes. No matter how often you use the word "public" it'll never change the fact we're talking about his private life.You mean the response he addressed to the Public and that was presented in the public sphere?
I'll be wrong the moment the situation you're referring to was not about his private sex life. And since it will never not have been, I'll never be wrong.Well, maybe you'll need to learn to live with the fact you are wrong?
What situation? The situation surrounding his private sex life? Got it.I just outlined how his handling of the situation speaks to his ability to perform his job.