• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Which religion will stand its ground against the gay agenda? [W:743:1845; 2006]

Who will still be standing


  • Total voters
    82
  • Poll closed .
re: Which religion will stand its ground against the gay agenda? [W:743]

Not before "people" starting getting married by rogue judges. That's the point. Roll with that.

What rouge judges?
 
re: Which religion will stand its ground against the gay agenda? [W:743]

The same ones that wear lipstick with their rouge.

Typo sorry, so what the heck are you talking about?
 
re: Which religion will stand its ground against the gay agenda? [W:743]

DOMA defined marriage for the federal government not State governments.
I see. Then you agree that the Federal Government should have zero power outside of National Defense and protecting our rights. Good for you.
 
re: Which religion will stand its ground against the gay agenda? [W:743]

I'm talking about HOW you change the laws. Democrats largely ignore laws they disagree with when they're instituting change they can believe in. That's the difference.

So you are ok with SSM you are just upset about how it is coming about?
 
re: Which religion will stand its ground against the gay agenda? [W:743]

protecting our rights. .

You talk about the protection of rights while wanting some poeple to not have any.
 
re: Which religion will stand its ground against the gay agenda? [W:743]

I see. So you agree that the Federal Government should have zero power outside of National Defense and protecting our rights. Good for you.


Not at all what I said. Any hows DOMA got struck down as unConstitutional, roll with it as per your own advice..
 
re: Which religion will stand its ground against the gay agenda? [W:743]

This thread has turned really strange with Dooble's bizarre posts.

Gays are apparently bad because there's "more" gay porn (who the hell actually counts and creates that statistic?) and because gay men have more sex partners than heterosexual men (because it's always only about men). Guess what, MEN have more sexual partners! So, the main complaint that this guy has against gay men... is really just about men.

And then we get to pride parades. Because someone who dresses in an elaborate costume for a spectacle does the same in their everyday life. Marching band members are always in uniform and walk like that, even at the grocery store. People who go to Star Trek conventions wear their uniforms year round. Actors wear their stage makeup 24/7. These are clearly true facts.

What possible bearing could any of that have on... well, I'm not really sure. I think it's just an argument of "gays are bad, mmmkay". And, of course, we have the "gay agenda". Seldom does anyone ever really explain what that is. I think it's something really awful like "gain social acceptance." Why that is a bad thing, however, is something they can never explain. Usually it falls back on the "gays are bad, mmmkay" argument. And invoking the bible.

Seriously, why do that? That is one argument that is never going to convince anyone new. People who believe it believe it, people who don't, don't. And the former will continue to shrink. Who seriously cares what the bible says or not? Either something is harmful or its not. And in this case, sexual orientation creates no harm whatsoever. The poor treatment of people based on their orientation certainly does, and shame on bigots for treating people so poorly and disgracing the role models they claim to emulate.

And then we have "the left is evil" conspiracy nonsense. Because "if the left doesn't like something, it must be wrong". Ever think that maybe dislike of something stems from it being wrong, instead of the other way around? And now we're starting the complaints about using the court to protect people's constitutional rights instead of referendums.

In before "activist judges". You know it's coming.

Haven't we dealt with these same tired arguments over and over already? I wish there were new ones...

Remember, gays are bad, mmmkay...
 
re: Which religion will stand its ground against the gay agenda? [W:743]

DOMA defined marriage for the federal government not State governments.
Oh, and you neglected to comment on the silly little clerk in Arizona who issued a marriage license without permission. That's part of what I'm talking about.

DOMA was meant for all states. And besides, that still doesn't change the fact that United States legal definition of marriage was violated by multiple states. The SC should've killed the petition and slam dunked those states.
 
re: Which religion will stand its ground against the gay agenda? [W:743]

Not at all what I said. Any hows DOMA got struck down as unConstitutional, roll with it as per your own advice..
What you said, without realizing you said it, is the Federal Government has no business enacting laws that conflict with YOUR preferences.
 
re: Which religion will stand its ground against the gay agenda? [W:743]

This thread has turned really strange with Dooble's bizarre posts.
A Socialist referring to my opinions as bizarre. That's rich.
 
re: Which religion will stand its ground against the gay agenda? [W:743]

Remember, gays are bad, mmmkay...
Correction: Gay behavior is bad. Please get it right, mmmkay?
 
re: Which religion will stand its ground against the gay agenda? [W:743]

Oh, and you neglected to comment on the silly little clerk in Arizona who issued a marriage license without permission. That's part of what I'm talking about.

DOMA was meant for all states. And besides, that still doesn't change the fact that United States legal definition of marriage was violated by multiple states. The SC should've killed the petition and slam dunked those states.


OKkay what ever sorry you are so butt hurt but as per your own words I'd suggest you just roll with it.
 
re: Which religion will stand its ground against the gay agenda? [W:743]

Correction: Gay behavior is bad. Please get it right, mmmkay?

You seem to think about it alot.......
 
re: Which religion will stand its ground against the gay agenda? [W:743]

Correction: Gay behavior is bad. Please get it right, mmmkay?

No it isnt
 
re: Which religion will stand its ground against the gay agenda? [W:743]

You seem to think about it alot.......
It's a major issue right now, Winston. Wake up and smell the stench of 'change'.
 
re: Which religion will stand its ground against the gay agenda? [W:743]

Have a good day guys. :2wave:
 
re: Which religion will stand its ground against the gay agenda? [W:743]


care to explain why? BTW if you go to the bible you have failed before you even start typing
 
re: Which religion will stand its ground against the gay agenda? [W:743]

Yay -- I get to be part of "the left"!! Finally!

It's about freaking time, too.

Man, I get called 'liberal," so often by the rightwing nutter's I lost count. Then, in the next thread, I get called a, "right wing facist," by the tree hugging liberals.

It ain't easy being me!

Rodney-Dangerfield.jpg
 
re: Which religion will stand its ground against the gay agenda? [W:743]

Since when was upholding a law persecution against gay people? I mean, I was in full support of DOMA and the legal definition of marriage, and yet, I'm still considered to be a knuckle dragging bigot by the Democrats. See, here's the problem: If the Left doesn't like something, then that something must be wrong. This is how liberals think. For example: The question might be asked "How do I know that what I think and feel is correct?" The Left's answer would be, "Ask a liberal; if you get a green light, then just do it. You can guilt society into embracing your advanced sense of evolvement along the way". But the correct answer would be, "What are the laws of society? If you're not breaking those laws, then roll with it. But if you don't like those laws, then simply petition to have them changed, BEFORE you do it. If you are unsuccessful, then rest at ease knowing that not everyone can have what they want, ALL the time, in a civilized society".

Something left wing nutjobs will never understand.
 
re: Which religion will stand its ground against the gay agenda? [W:743]

I just wanted to know which religion you think will be the last one standing. Don't have a cow, man.

I hope none of them. For the reasons I stated, it would anti-Christian for them to do so.
 
re: Which religion will stand its ground against the gay agenda? [W:743]

Sexual orientation is a made up term to excuse the behavior.

It is good to see that you don't understand the definition. This demonstrates the basic problem with your argument and why it has no validity. See, just because you claim something doesn't exist doesn't mean it doesn't... which in this case it of course does.

Also, all you just did is say, essentially, "yes, you are correct, but since that accuracy is in opposition to my agenda, I choose to not listen." Your argument just continues to fall apart worse and worse.
 
Back
Top Bottom