- Joined
- May 19, 2006
- Messages
- 156,720
- Reaction score
- 53,497
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
You've shown no such thing. That source you used, the Family Research Council? They merely came to the same conclusions I did, but much sooner. I don't need to use the FRC as a source when there are already so many staring you in the face. I linked a few of them, and I suspect I've only been scratching the surface.
Of course I have. Anything you have produced has, as I have shown, fallen into one of two categories: 1) standard agenda that any minority group would have; 2) dishonesty presented by the religious right. The fact that you have come to the same conclusions as the FRC proves that your conclusions are dishonest agenda-based, since we know that theirs is. I'm sure that I speak for everyone here when I say thank you for admitting this.
So, since we now know that your positions on the "gay agenda" are similar to the FRC's (you admitted it), and that we know that the FRC's are misrepresentations and outright lies, we know that YOUR position is nothing but misrepresentations and outright lies. Now, if you want to continue this line, feel free, but I encourage all other posters in this thread to respond with what I said in mind. That way we can all just point out your lies and lack of logic.
Let's see what you move on to now.