• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Do You Agree With This Statement?

Do you agree with the statement quoted in the OP?


  • Total voters
    32
No amount of context or contortion could justify a comment of that nature and scope.
 
If Ann Coulter came on TV and told me that the sky was blue, I'd call her a liar and check for myself. She's a horrid person who has done more damage to the right than anybody in the last 10 years combined.

Y'all seriously need to get her off your side.

She's a fabulous provocateuse.:peace
 
If Ann Coulter came on TV and told me that the sky was blue, I'd call her a liar and check for myself. She's a horrid person who has done more damage to the right than anybody in the last 10 years combined.

Y'all seriously need to get her off your side.

If Ann Coulter came on TV....I'd switch the channel. She can get rich off of other idiots who can't tell it's all a ploy to rally people and anger others into buying her damned merchandise.
 
She sells books to both the left and the right because she says outrageous and ridiculous things. And y'all keep buying her books. So long as you do, she ain't going away.

I wouldn't buy anything of hers, but I do read on line occasionally what she states as her opinion because it's interesting to me to follow the career of the world's most successful tranny.....................
 
I wouldn't buy anything of hers, but I do read on line occasionally what she states as her opinion because it's interesting to me to follow the career of the world's most successful tranny.....................

Where as I don't give a ****. So keep following that tranny around, I got better things to do.
 
Where as I don't give a ****. So keep following that tranny around, I got better things to do.

Ouch. I didn't intend to get on your bad side.........................
 
Ouch. I didn't intend to get on your bad side.........................

that ain't bad side buddy, that's just a statement of fact. Have fun, good luck, I ain't gonna stop you. But I'd rather play Super Meatboy than listen to Coulter on anything.
 
Then why refer to her as a "tranny?":roll:

Did you read the post I quoted? Don't be stupid.

Here, I'll do it for you since reading doesn't appear to be a pastime you enjoy

I wouldn't buy anything of hers, but I do read on line occasionally what she states as her opinion because it's interesting to me to follow the career of the world's most successful tranny.....................
 
Did you read the post I quoted? Don't be stupid.

Here, I'll do it for you since reading doesn't appear to be a pastime you enjoy

So . . . the fact that Bonzai is bigoted is your permission to be bigoted too?:roll:
 
that ain't bad side buddy, that's just a statement of fact. Have fun, good luck, I ain't gonna stop you. But I'd rather play Super Meatboy than listen to Coulter on anything.

I guess I shouldn't bother reading her either....................
 
Couple points:

1: I intentionally did not state who made the comment, though I did not hide it. The issue is not Ann Coulter, but the comment. I would appreciate if we could refrain from talking about her, and talk instead about the comment, what is right or wrong about it. Thank you.

2: So far this thread has been pretty good about avoiding the race baiting, high rhetoric/low content type postings. Thank you for that, let's try and continue with that.

3: I would appreciate if people could explain there thoughts in more depth towards the comment itself. Thank you in advance if you can do that.
 
Did you read the post I quoted? Don't be stupid.

Here, I'll do it for you since reading doesn't appear to be a pastime you enjoy

So . . . the fact that Bonzai is bigoted is your permission to be bigoted too?:roll:

Meanwhile, back at the topic...
 
So . . . the fact that Bonzai is bigoted is your permission to be bigoted too?:roll:

I was just responding in his terms. As I said, I don't give a ****. So don't expect me to respond as if I do. Jesus tap dancing Christ on a pogo stick, it shouldn't be this tough.
 
I guess I shouldn't bother reading her either....................

Well, that depends. Do you ever plan on being taken seriously by anybody other than the far, far right mouthbreathers?
 
So . . . the fact that Bonzai is bigoted is your permission to be bigoted too?:roll:

The scathing assumptions you make........................
 
Couple points:

1: I intentionally did not state who made the comment, though I did not hide it. The issue is not Ann Coulter, but the comment. I would appreciate if we could refrain from talking about her, and talk instead about the comment, what is right or wrong about it. Thank you.

2: So far this thread has been pretty good about avoiding the race baiting, high rhetoric/low content type postings. Thank you for that, let's try and continue with that.

3: I would appreciate if people could explain there thoughts in more depth towards the comment itself. Thank you in advance if you can do that.

Come on, Red. :lol: You can't post an Ann Coulter article and not expect people to become animated about it. It's not gonna happen.
 
I was just responding in his terms. As I said, I don't give a ****. So don't expect me to respond as if I do. Jesus tap dancing Christ on a pogo stick, it shouldn't be this tough.

You're right. It's not that tough, except when you're supporting bigotry.:peace
 
You're right. It's not that tough, except when you're supporting bigotry.:peace

Mmmm,yes. And I'm sure you have actual proof of that beyond me responding to a post in terms which it was delivered? Or is this just more daft behavior?
 
Mmmm,yes. And I'm sure you have actual proof of that beyond me responding to a post in terms which it was delivered? Or is this just more daft behavior?

I judge you only by your posts.:peace
 
Back
Top Bottom