• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

If someone only molest young boys is he gay, a pedohile or both. [W:417]

If someone only molests young boys is he gay, a pedohile, or both


  • Total voters
    68
Who cares, they should be dead before that is found out and used as an excuse.
 
I think it depends on the actual age of the children.

There is a pretty big developmental gap between age 5 and age 17. Between Law & Order SVU and common sense I would think gender isn't much of an issue to someone molesting 5 year olds.

Also, I'm not sure if you can necessarily label a pedophile as homosexual, heterosexual, etc. I mean is a man homosexual because he likes to have sex with male zebras?




I would classify him as a "zoosexual", and hope that the court locks him up.
 
Why would you use a dictionary for a psychological term and not use the psychological definition? Using a standard dictionary would be less precise.

Because Merek is just not a homosexual activist with a leftist political agenda but is one of those white beard scratching liberals who just not changes the meanings of words to further a political agenda but also creates new words with new definitions the further his own radical political agenda.


Beyond Homophobia » About Dr. Herek

Sexual Prejudice: Understanding Homophobia and Heterosexism (You'll notice that Herek uses the same dictionary when it furthers his agenda.)

I can't seem to find the article where Merek wants to change the definition of homophobia. Lets put it this way, Merek is just a radical gay leftist comparable to the hate monger Morris Dees.

Excerpt:

>" Homophobia is an etymologically incorrect term which most directly denotes "an unreasoning fear of or antipathy toward homosexuals and homosexuality",[2] but it also includes a fear of increased political and social power of homosexuals in advancing their agenda. The term is used regularly by activists to describe several kinds of people, which may or may not match the actual definition of "fear of homosexuals and homosexuality". The recipients of the homophobia label include those who feel uncomfortable around homosexuals, those who reveal that they oppose "gays," and even those who may privately support homosexuality but who fail to publicly support homosexuals when called upon to do so.[3]

Conservative Christians and other people who strongly object to homosexuality often take offense at this term, which had led to the use of the term heterophobia to describe those who manifest an antipathy to those who uphold heterosexuality as normative or exclusively valid. While the term phobia is an irrational fear of something, nobody is afraid of homosexuals, and nobody fears contracting homosexuality. That is in contrast to heterophobia, whose existence has been documented..."< Homophobia - Conservapedia
 
I would classify him as a "zoosexual", and hope that the court locks him up.

My point was he's looking for a typical sexual designation to someone who clearly has very atypical sexual preferences.
 
One can be both gay/bi and a molester. Then again, one could also be hetero and a molester. Both types of molesters are equally disgusting.
 
Because Merek is just not a homosexual activist with a leftist political agenda but is one of those white beard scratching liberals who just not changes the meanings of words to further a political agenda but also creates new words with new definitions the further his own radical political agenda.


Beyond Homophobia » About Dr. Herek

Sexual Prejudice: Understanding Homophobia and Heterosexism (You'll notice that Herek uses the same dictionary when it furthers his agenda.)

I can't seem to find the article where Merek wants to change the definition of homophobia. Lets put it this way, Merek is just a radical gay leftist comparable to the hate monger Morris Dees.

Excerpt:

>" Homophobia is an etymologically incorrect term which most directly denotes "an unreasoning fear of or antipathy toward homosexuals and homosexuality",[2] but it also includes a fear of increased political and social power of homosexuals in advancing their agenda. The term is used regularly by activists to describe several kinds of people, which may or may not match the actual definition of "fear of homosexuals and homosexuality". The recipients of the homophobia label include those who feel uncomfortable around homosexuals, those who reveal that they oppose "gays," and even those who may privately support homosexuality but who fail to publicly support homosexuals when called upon to do so.[3]

Conservative Christians and other people who strongly object to homosexuality often take offense at this term, which had led to the use of the term heterophobia to describe those who manifest an antipathy to those who uphold heterosexuality as normative or exclusively valid. While the term phobia is an irrational fear of something, nobody is afraid of homosexuals, and nobody fears contracting homosexuality. That is in contrast to heterophobia, whose existence has been documented..."< Homophobia - Conservapedia

None of which is evidence against what the source said, nor the results of the studies cited in the source.
 
They're gay as they're having gay sex and attracted to a male.


They are also a sick organism with deep emotional and mental issues. Honestly such types truly need to have their minds wiped because you cannot "fix" a biological mental disease in someone. You can drug them but that doesn't fix it, it treats it. Mentally sick people will always be mentally sick.

Medications simply subdue their symptoms and manic episodes, they do not fix them and cannot. You can always trigger someone with these mental diseases because they're never truly "fixed" even when on medication. That's why you cannot truly help a pedophile. It's a biological issue. The only way to truly "fix" them would be to wipe their mind or physically operate on them.
 
A bigger question would be this...

If you like Fish Sticks, are you a gay fish?
 
I'm not going to play the 'I'm smarter than you so I'll make a stupid point in response' card like others have done.

Yes - an individual who is attracted to only the opposite sex is gay.
A person who uses children for sexual wants is a pedophile.

I know by saying this that I am not stating that all gays are pedophiles, or all pedophiles are gay, or whatever.

It's very simple.

Whoever said (in this thread) that a pedophile acts on opportunity (thus suggesting that it wouldn't matter what sex the child is) is full of ****.




A person can't learn all that there is to know about Pedophilia in a few minutes.

It is a complicated subject.

Here's a good place to start:Pedophilia - children, causes, DSM, functioning, therapy, adults, person, people

If you spend a few years reading you might learn some basic facts about the subject.

Don't pay any attention to anything that Navy Pride posts on this subject.
 
This is incorrect. There is no correlation between the sex of the child that is molested and the sexual orientation of the molester. The vast majority of men who molest boys are heterosexuals. Plenty of research and statistics on this.

Male to male=gay, undeclared is no excuse and does not change the fact, Catholic priest that molest young boys are gay
 
What do you think?

Navy...depends on the age group.

And it can't be "If someone" likes..yadda, yadda, yadda.

If a man only molest...etc, etc. etc...

And you could actually change the word "man" to "woman" and "boys" to "girls". It's rare but it happens.

And men and women can be attracted to children of the opposite sex...and it still can be called something like "pedophile".

Pedophiles is the most common word used to describe a sexual behavior between adults and children. But it's not always correctly used. True pedophiles are over the age of 16 and are only attracted to prepubescent children (under the age of 10 years old).

For the primary sexual interest in 11–14 year old pubescents...that's clinically known as Hebephilia. For mid-to-late adolescents (15–19), the clinical term is Ephebophilia.

The key element involved in any of these "PHILIAS" is...adults believing children to be their natural sex partners.
 
Male to male=gay, undeclared is no excuse and does not change the fact, Catholic priest that molest young boys are gay

Paedophilia is a paraphilia, where sexual desire is directed at pre-pubescent children. Because of that, paedophiles are largely uninterested in the gender of their victim because the attraction is not directed at secondary sexual characteristics.

It is entirely possible for a paedophile to have and maintain adult heterosexual relationships while molesting children of the same sex. Paedophilia, as a paraphilia, is entirely separate from the paedophiles sexual orientation.
 
When I was a little kid I could do that laugh perfectly.
 
Paedophilia is a paraphilia, where sexual desire is directed at pre-pubescent children. Because of that, paedophiles are largely uninterested in the gender of their victim because the attraction is not directed at secondary sexual characteristics.

It is entirely possible for a paedophile to have and maintain adult heterosexual relationships while molesting children of the same sex. Paedophilia, as a paraphilia, is entirely separate from the paedophiles sexual orientation.

Already seen it first hand involving a teacher at a local high school who secretly saw a young boy from one of his classes, by law he was illegally molesting the boy. They live together now as partners.
 
As I've never known any paedophiles (thank god), the closest thing to a documentary I've seen is The Woodsman starring Kevin Bacon in his creepiest role ever. It features a child molester who focuses exclusively on little girls, and in a bizarre twist finds an adversary in another child molester who focuses exclusively on little boys. I have absolutely no idea how accurate the movie is with regards to paedophiles.

It's a good movie, but I do not suggest it for date night.
 
If someone constantly ponders questions about homosexuality, are they full on gay, or merely bi-curious?
You see, sangha has this "friend" who thinks he might be full on gay, or at least bi-curious.
 
I really despise this topic, but the whole "gay pedophile/hetero pedophile" is very confusing. I might think that if a man molests little boys exclusively, he might be considered gay to some extent. Obviously, it is a genitalia preference of a penis over a vagina. I don't think anyone can really say for sure though, as you can't be inside someone else's head, and it's particularly tricky if the person has a mental defect to begin with.
 
Already seen it first hand involving a teacher at a local high school who secretly saw a young boy from one of his classes, by law he was illegally molesting the boy. They live together now as partners.

Clinically speaking, that's ephebophilia, a different kettle of inderaged fish to paedophilia.
 
That may explain why they refuse my invitations to "hang out" in my basement.
You've been putting out the vibe, and never even realized it. ;)
 
Back
Top Bottom