• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

If someone only molest young boys is he gay, a pedohile or both. [W:417]

If someone only molests young boys is he gay, a pedohile, or both


  • Total voters
    68
I have never started a thread like this my left wing friend.:confused:

Forgot your threads on the Boy Scouts (including the one you skirted from) already, did you?
 
Strange. I know I found some recent literature indicating a true pedophile typically has no sexual preference. It just seems that way because Males have greater social access to young boys than to young girls. I'll see if I can find it and post it.

NP often has started threads and polls against gays if memory serves me correctly.

To the extent NP believes his logic condemns gays, in fact then his logic condemns heterosexuals and makes a case that gays are safer around children than heterosexual men in terms of sexual assault potential. What that means, of course, is that his reasoning isn't reasoning, but rather - ultimately - an attempt at severe gay bashing - but using logic that actually condemns heterosexual men if his logic has any merit.

I believe what some research espouses: Pedophilia is a sexual orientation. Therefore, I answered "pedophile."

Not a bad article to read regarding pedophilia..

Pedophilia and Child Sexual Molestation

Okay I need to correct myself. The most current Psychiatric/Psychological literature actually states that pedophiles do not have a sexual orientation (like homosexual or heterosexual) because they are unable to have adult relationships, they are fixated only on children. Some literature also proposes that they do have a sexual orientation, but it is for children (regardless of the child's sex).

Further, that some prefer boys, some girls, and some both. This preference is established BEFORE a pedophile reaches puberty, suggesting it may very well be a distinct (albeit harmful and destructive) sexual orientation.

The literature I was using was older than I thought. Sorry.

In any case this literature does not identify pedophiles as either homosexual or heterosexual. That makes my vote for "pedophile" alone.

I think the reason it seems more prevalent among boys is because males have more social access to boys than girls, and boys are starting to report it more.
 
Last edited:
Why does it matter, a sick pedophile is a sick pedophile, gay or straight or whatever.

Attacking Gays is a common way closeted Gays deal with their inner demons.
 
Attacking Gays is a common way closeted Gays deal with their inner demons.

That is the original meaning of the word "homophobia." A person who attacks gays to try to disprove his gay sexual fantasies to himself, ie to incessantly condemn homosexuality to prove to himself he isn't a homosexual (or bisexual). This seems to apply to the OP as he asserts that ALL gays are male. If I recall correctly, he always does that. Note he uses "someone" rather than "man." The rest of us know gays are male and female, but to the OP he ONLY contexts homosexuality to his own gender.
 
That is the original meaning of the word "homophobia." A person who attacks gays to try to disprove his gay sexual fantasies to himself, ie to incessantly condemn homosexuality to prove to himself he isn't a homosexual (or bisexual). This seems to apply to the OP as he asserts that ALL gays are male. If I recall correctly, he always does that. Note he uses "someone" rather than "man." The rest of us know gays are male and female, but to the OP he ONLY contexts homosexuality to his own gender.

I know a homophobe who seems to love anal sex.
 
What do you think?

If someone molests little boys or little girls, that doesn't make them gay. It makes them a (bleep!)ing pedophile, nothing more and nothing less. (Is there anything less?)
 
If a man molest a little boy I don't care if you label him "gay" or "pedophile" so long as you can correctly describe that man as dead.
 
If someone molests little boys or little girls, that doesn't make them gay. It makes them a (bleep!)ing pedophile, nothing more and nothing less. (Is there anything less?)

I've seen this type before.

He wanted us to all confirm his bigoted beliefs that all pedophiles are Gay, knowing all too well that we would do no such thing and instead question why he is attacking homosexuals.
 
I've seen this type before.

He wanted us to all confirm his bigoted beliefs that all pedophiles are Gay, knowing all too well that we would do no such thing and instead question why he is attacking homosexuals.

You are so wrong my left wing friend there are a lot of gay males who are not attracted to male children and there are gay male pedophiles attracted to young boys but not young girls, they gay pedophile priests prove that.
 
Forgot your threads on the Boy Scouts (including the one you skirted from) already, did you?

Sorry this is a completely different topic my left wing friend, even someone as biased as you can see that.
 
You are so wrong my left wing friend there are a lot of gay males who are not attracted to male children.

Almost all of them in fact. Remember, in order, pedophiles are people with no real adult sexuality who are exclusively attracted to kids(most pedophiles), those who are straight(almost all the rest of pedophiles), and those who are gay(the handful left). Your sad little attempt to conflate the two together is pathetic and you know better. You can no longer use ignorance as an excuse since it has been explained and documented to you repeatedly. At this point you are just lying to smear those you look down upon.
 
What do you think?

He's a pedophile.

Some pedophiles experience attraction to both adults and children, and oftentimes, their sexual preference for adults is independent of their sexual preference for children (and often they don't even have a preference for the latter). However, true pedophiles exclusively desire children, even if they have adult relationships as a sort of "cover."

So, there doesn't appear to be any consistent correlation between sexual preference and the sex of their child victims.

As an example of this, here's just the straight-up numbers: almost all pedophiles are men. About 1/3 of them prey on male children. But only about 2-5% of the population is gay. So obviously, there's a lot more pedophiles who molest male children than there are gay people.

The reason for this may be because, socially, a man has more access to male children than he does female children. Pedophiles usually molest children they know. So this could be a family member (who would have access to children of either sex), but also something like a scout leader, or a coach, who would probably only have access to male children.

Pedophiles are fundamentally opportunistic. Some do prefer one sex over another, but their primary attraction is to children.
 
Why would that be. It makes no sense.

People often compensate for and deal with their own self hatred and inner demons, by attacking others who represent that which they hate most about themselves.
 
People often compensate for and deal with their own self hatred and inner demons, by attacking others who represent that which they hate most about themselves.

Only thing worse is people who have overcome a vice. I HATE ex-smokers.
 
You are so wrong my left wing friend there are a lot of gay males who are not attracted to male children and there are gay male pedophiles attracted to young boys but not young girls, they gay pedophile priests prove that.

WRONG!!! Entering the (Catholic) Priesthood means you don't have to portray a heterosexual role by engaging in expected male-female wooing and wedding. Since he is not heterosexual he can avoid women. That does not make him "GAY" since none of the Priests alleged or convicted seemed to have been engaging in ADULT sexual activities with any men.

A person who is solely attracted to children would seek the Priesthood for easy access to either boys or girls. Since Catholic rituals traditionally use boys in services and often had boys choirs, a male pedophile with a preference for male children would naturally gravitate to this role. It grants him easy and secret access without the pressure of pretending to like women, or dealing with gay men.
 
Last edited:
WRONG!!! Entering the (Catholic) Priesthood means you don't have to portray a heterosexual role by engaging in expected male-female wooing and wedding. A person who is solely attracted to children would seek the Priesthood for easy access to either boys or girls. Since Catholic rituals traditionally use boys in services and often had boys choirs, a male pedophile with a preference for male children would naturally gravitate to this role.

That does not make him "GAY." None of the Priests seem to have been engaging in ADULT sexual activities.

i like the way you explain things, even in the constitution section...
 
not every gay man is a pedophile, but every male pedophile is gay that goes after young boys.
 
Why would that be. It makes no sense.

Actually, it does. It's probably most common in those who are closeted even with regards to themselves. They think by attacking others, it means they must not be gay or else it's a way to deflect. To be clear, I'm not saying this is you. I don't believe you're gay. What I do believe, NP, is that you keep bringing the issue up is because it makes you feel morally superior.

Something I've noticed is that none of the threads (which have been thankfully few) that advocate adult/minor sexual relationships have been started by any of the gay members of the forum (that I know of). I condemn pedos equally, no matter who their preferred victims are.
 
He's a pedophile.

Some pedophiles experience attraction to both adults and children, and oftentimes, their sexual preference for adults is independent of their sexual preference for children (and often they don't even have a preference for the latter). However, true pedophiles exclusively desire children, even if they have adult relationships as a sort of "cover."

So, there doesn't appear to be any consistent correlation between sexual preference and the sex of their child victims.

As an example of this, here's just the straight-up numbers: almost all pedophiles are men. About 1/3 of them prey on male children. But only about 2-5% of the population is gay. So obviously, there's a lot more pedophiles who molest male children than there are gay people.

The reason for this may be because, socially, a man has more access to male children than he does female children. Pedophiles usually molest children they know. So this could be a family member (who would have access to children of either sex), but also something like a scout leader, or a coach, who would probably only have access to male children.

Pedophiles are fundamentally opportunistic. Some do prefer one sex over another, but their primary attraction is to children.

How do you explain that all the priests molested only boys no girls.:confused:
 
Actually, it does. It's probably most common in those who are closeted even with regards to themselves. They think by attacking others, it means they must not be gay or else it's a way to deflect. To be clear, I'm not saying this is you. I don't believe you're gay. What I do believe, NP, is that you keep bringing the issue up is because it makes you feel morally superior.

Something I've noticed is that none of the threads (which have been thankfully few) that advocate adult/minor sexual relationships have been started by any of the gay members of the forum (that I know of). I condemn pedos equally, no matter who their preferred victims are.

wow that is pretty heavy but you are wrong. I am just trying to find out how everyone feels on this issue. Some of my liberal and gay friends get all bent out of shape when I bring up subjects like this but I would like to learn.
 
WRONG!!! Entering the (Catholic) Priesthood means you don't have to portray a heterosexual role by engaging in expected male-female wooing and wedding. Since he is not heterosexual he can avoid women. That does not make him "GAY" since none of the Priests alleged or convicted seemed to have been engaging in ADULT sexual activities with any men.

A person who is solely attracted to children would seek the Priesthood for easy access to either boys or girls. Since Catholic rituals traditionally use boys in services and often had boys choirs, a male pedophile with a preference for male children would naturally gravitate to this role. It grants him easy and secret access without the pressure of pretending to like women, or dealing with gay men.

How do we know these gay pedophile priests are not attracted to adults?
 
Same reason "christians" always attack the sins of others while ignoring their own maybe?

Or how liberals object to blanket statements being made about them while having no trouble making blanket statements about others? :2razz:
 
Back
Top Bottom