• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

If someone only molest young boys is he gay, a pedohile or both. [W:417]

If someone only molests young boys is he gay, a pedohile, or both


  • Total voters
    68
He had his eyes opened in the Navy. I think he said his eyes....
 
He had his eyes opened in the Navy. I think he said his eyes....

Dammit, I keep telling you guys...it is not the navy. Most of us came out of the navy perfectly straight. Just because marines are so pretty all bent over for us doesn't make us gay...
 
Dammit, I keep telling you guys...it is not the navy. Most of us came out of the navy perfectly straight. Just because marines are so pretty all bent over for us doesn't make us gay...

Friend of mine told me that he was dishonerably discharged from the Navy because he beat the **** out of a guy who raped a Navyman who was Gay. Horrible story.
 
It depends on their occupation, family, chance, etc. As an extreme form of rape, the pedo is not interested in sex but power and domination; sexual preference doesn't really matter.
Let's say there's a married homosexual who works for MSNBC and he meets a 14 year old boy at the local YMCA. Let's say they make great eye contact, and fall in love in the back seat of the gay adult's car. we'll say they keep things secret for the next 6 months, and the relationship flourishes. The kid's parents finally find out what's going on, and they want to have the married homosexual thrown in prison. Do they have a case?
 
Let's say there's a married homosexual who works for MSNBC and he meets a 14 year old boy at the local YMCA. Let's say they make great eye contact, and fall in love in the back seat of the gay adult's car. we'll say they keep things secret for the next 6 months, and the relationship flourishes. The kid's parents finally find out what's going on, and they want to have the married homosexual thrown in prison. Do they have a case?

1. Gross.
2. 14 would be (should be) statutory rape.
 
Someone who molests a young boy is sick in the head and should be castrated.

That is all.
 
Let's say there's a married homosexual who works for MSNBC and he meets a 14 year old boy at the local YMCA. Let's say they make great eye contact, and fall in love in the back seat of the gay adult's car. we'll say they keep things secret for the next 6 months, and the relationship flourishes. The kid's parents finally find out what's going on, and they want to have the married homosexual thrown in prison. Do they have a case?

Below the age of consent, so yes.
 
they are a pedophile

they might ALSO be gay in their adult life just like they might also be straight in their adult life or bi

but molesting prepubescence children is pedophilia
their pedophilia has nothing to do with their adult sexuality
 
You've been told this thousands of times, if you didn't listen then, why should we expect you to listen now?

1000? i think you are being nice and rounding down
 
NP often has started threads and polls against gays if memory serves me correctly.

In fact, the majority of sexual assaults against children and adults are by men against girls and women.

To the extent NP believes his logic condemns gays, in fact then his logic condemns heterosexuals and makes a case that gays are safer around children than heterosexual men in terms of sexual assault potential. What that means, of course, is that his reasoning isn't reasoning, but rather - ultimately - an attempt at severe gay bashing - but using logic that actually condemns heterosexual men if his logic has any merit.
 
What do you think?

Define "boy" and I'll be able to answer your poll question.

Why don't they molest girls then?

Umm..why do you think that all pedophiles that molest boys don't also molest girls? In the psychiatric literature it is thought that pedophiles have no sexual preference, they simply molest available targets of opportunity. Men have greater opportunities to be alone with boys, not so much with girls.
 
Last edited:
You start threads on this subject all the time. Don't you get tired asking the same question every several months?
 
i vote "i like potatoes." i'm disappointed that this choice was not included as an option.
 
Not a bad article to read regarding pedophilia..

Pedophilia and Child Sexual Molestation

Strange. I know I found some recent literature indicating a true pedophile typically has no sexual preference. It just seems that way because Males have greater social access to young boys than to young girls. I'll see if I can find it and post it.
 
I found the best answer to the thread.

Yes, it is ok to be Gay.
 
You start threads on this subject all the time. Don't you get tired asking the same question every several months?


I have never started a thread like this my left wing friend.:confused:
 
Last edited:
Sure it is... That is not the question though.

But isn't it?

Isn't it really?

That's what discussions like this tend to real boil down to.
 
Why does it matter, a sick pedophile is a sick pedophile, gay or straight or whatever.
 
Back
Top Bottom