• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

If someone only molest young boys is he gay, a pedohile or both. [W:417]

If someone only molests young boys is he gay, a pedohile, or both


  • Total voters
    68
male on male = gay. end of discussion

Wrong. You don't understand the difference between sexual orientation and sexual behavior. End of discussion/

Sexual orientation is just a more postitive description for deviant behavior

No, it describes a state of being and attraction... but since you have proven time and time again that you lack understanding and education on this topic, I will just keep repeating the basics.
 
If you have sex with another male, you're gay on some level. Having sex with a woman doesn't "Undo the homosexuality" nor does it make you a "special case". Gay sex is gay sex.


The entire bisexual movement is simply people who can't stomach that they're actually gay.

This post has nothing to do with reality. You do not understand the difference between sexual orientation and sexual behavior. Get back to us when you do.
 
It's obvious that you are well read and or experienced in sodomy.

I have to admit, I'm not even a layman when it comes to same sex anal sodomy or male peter puffers.

I guess I'll go looking for a thread on heterosexual sex, now that's something I'm well experienced with.

It's obvious that you do not know how to research topics so that you have some understanding of them when you post. As I said, I always appreciate it when someone admits that they are ignorant on a topic. It's refreshing and something we don't see often here. I also find it interesting that you are having difficulty understanding what I write. Perhaps you might want to re-read my posts to gather their correct meaning. Fear not, though. I will be happy to correct you when you make an error, which you have been doing fairly consistently in this thread.
 
Wrong. You don't understand the difference between sexual orientation and sexual behavior. End of discussion/



No, it describes a state of being and attraction... but since you have proven time and time again that you lack understanding and education on this topic, I will just keep repeating the basics.

No, you will continue to be sensitive to false information that has been programmed into you because of a refusal to think for yourself.
 
Some people simply can't accept that just because they assign a neat little "bisexual" label to their sex with the same sex does not mean the rest of us are going to say "Oh, then you must not be gay because you call it bisexual instead of gay".


Ughhh Yeah No. It's gay. You just can't accept it is all. If you have sex with the same sex you're gay.


If you want to call it bisexual to help you sleep better at night fine but most see it for what it is, homosexuality.
 
It's obvious that you do not know how to research topics so that you have some understanding of them when you post.

There is no reason for me to do any research on this topic because I don't have any sexual or psychological problems.

When I get a woody when looking at some male, then I'll start researching to find out what the problem is.

I would never seek the advice of a psychiatrist or psychologist because as soon as I did, I would no longer would be able to exercise my Second Amendment Rights and could expect Big Sis ATF agents kicking down my front door and confiscating my guns.
 
There is no reason for me to do any research on this topic because I don't have any sexual or psychological problems.

So your belief is that research and expansion of knowledge is only useful if the knowledge acquired can tell an individual something about themselves as individuals? :confused:
 
Some people simply can't accept that just because they assign a neat little "bisexual" label to their sex with the same sex does not mean the rest of us are going to say "Oh, then you must not be gay because you call it bisexual instead of gay".


Ughhh Yeah No. It's gay. You just can't accept it is all. If you have sex with the same sex you're gay.


If you want to call it bisexual to help you sleep better at night fine but most see it for what it is, homosexuality.
Who you have sex with does not determine your orientation. Many gay men had sex with women. Until you understand the difference between sex and sexual orientation, you won't ever understand homosexuality.
 
Who you have sex with does not determine your orientation. Many gay men had sex with women. Until you understand the difference between sex and sexual orientation, you won't ever understand homosexuality.


Yes. It. Does.


If you aren't gay, you won't have sex with the same sex.


Simply because you "switch it up" does not mean the homosexual attraction is "undone". It isn't. In non gay people that attraction isn't there. The gay sex is not there. If the gay sex exists at all, you can call it a million things but at the end of the day it's being gay.


Go ask a woman on some rural farm in China 500 miles from a city with no historical contact with urbanization, ask her if a man who has sex with men and women is gay or not. We all know what the answer would be. That is your answer. The uncontaminated answer of the rural farm person is the raw, uncorrupted truth, and there's no way she'd say "Oh, they're Bisexual!". She'd think you're crazy to suggest anything but gay.
 
Yes. It. Does.


If you aren't gay, you won't have sex with the same sex.


Simply because you "switch it up" does not mean the homosexual attraction is "undone". It isn't. In non gay people that attraction isn't there. The gay sex is not there. If the gay sex exists at all, you can call it a million things but at the end of the day it's being gay.


Go ask a woman on some rural farm in China 500 miles from a city with no historical contact with urbanization, ask her if a man who has sex with men and women is gay or not. We all know what the answer would be. That is your answer. The uncontaminated answer of the rural farm person is the raw, uncorrupted truth, and there's no way she'd say "Oh, they're Bisexual!". She'd think you're crazy to suggest anything but gay.
Homosexuals are homosexual regardless of who they have sex with. The same is true for heterosexuals. You can have sex with someone you are not attracted to.

Go ask a rural woman in China how to design a rocket, and then tell me how accurate her raw uncorrupted truth is. Your argument is laughable.
 
Homosexuals are homosexual regardless of who they have sex with. The same is true for heterosexuals. You can have sex with someone you are not attracted to.

Go ask a rural woman in China how to design a rocket, and then tell me how accurate her raw uncorrupted truth is. Your argument is laughable.

No your logic is laughable. Comparing sexual norms of humans over our entire history to building a rocket is a dismal response.
 
No your logic is laughable. Comparing sexual norms of humans over our entire history to building a rocket is a dismal response.
Arguing that the answers to scientific questions about sexuality lie with an uneducated Chinese villager is nonsense. Its the most pathetic argument against homosexuality I have ever come across.
 
Arguing that the answers to scientific questions about sexuality lie with an uneducated Chinese villager is nonsense. Its the most pathetic argument against homosexuality I have ever come across.

Lol. "Its" is the wrong usage. It's is the correct usage in that sentence.

Clearly not an educated post or logical position after all.
 
No, you will continue to be sensitive to false information that has been programmed into you because of a refusal to think for yourself.

You will continue to remain uneducated on this topic even when facts and logic is presented that demonstrate that you don't know what you are talking about. You have shown quite consistently that you don't know the difference between sexual orientation and sexual behavior. But tell you what... prove me wrong. Tell us the difference and then apply it to the issue in this thread.
 
Some people simply can't accept that just because they assign a neat little "bisexual" label to their sex with the same sex does not mean the rest of us are going to say "Oh, then you must not be gay because you call it bisexual instead of gay".


Ughhh Yeah No. It's gay. You just can't accept it is all. If you have sex with the same sex you're gay.


If you want to call it bisexual to help you sleep better at night fine but most see it for what it is, homosexuality.

Ryan... even if you post inaccurate information like the above countless times, it doesn't magically come true. This is known as the appeal to repetition logical fallacy.
 
If you've never heard of a pedophile that sexually prefers children, I can't help you.

With the absence of sexual orientation to adults at all? Real life examples, please.
 
There is no reason for me to do any research on this topic because I don't have any sexual or psychological problems.

So, you choose to remain ignorant of information when you discuss things. I appreciate your honesty around this. It's good that we know that you choose to remain uninformed about the things that you debate. Helps us all with recognizing your lack of credibility.

Btw... your comment is also a false dichotomy. So, we now know that not only do you choose to avoid facts on topics of which you discuss, but that you have no ability to debate logically, either. I would hope that these are not your "strengths".

When I get a woody when looking at some male, then I'll start researching to find out what the problem is.

As I said... I am very glad that you have honestly stated that you don't know anything about this topic. You might want to consider not speaking about it anymore since you have admitted this. I mean, it might be embarrassing if I have to keep reminding you of this.

I would never seek the advice of a psychiatrist or psychologist because as soon as I did, I would no longer would be able to exercise my Second Amendment Rights and could expect Big Sis ATF agents kicking down my front door and confiscating my guns.

This would only occur if you had some serious psychological issues. Interesting that you would be concerned about this occurring.
 
Yes. It. Does.

No. It. Doesn't. Just because you don't understand the difference between sexual orientation and sexual behavior doesn't mean that this kind of ignorance on this topic is widespread and accurate.


If you aren't gay, you won't have sex with the same sex.

Wrong. Evidence proves you are incorrect. Obviously, you are uninterested in learning the correct material on this topic.


Simply because you "switch it up" does not mean the homosexual attraction is "undone". It isn't. In non gay people that attraction isn't there. The gay sex is not there. If the gay sex exists at all, you can call it a million things but at the end of the day it's being gay.

Tell us the difference between sexual orientation and sexual behavior.


Go ask a woman on some rural farm in China 500 miles from a city with no historical contact with urbanization, ask her if a man who has sex with men and women is gay or not. We all know what the answer would be. That is your answer. The uncontaminated answer of the rural farm person is the raw, uncorrupted truth, and there's no way she'd say "Oh, they're Bisexual!". She'd think you're crazy to suggest anything but gay.

Your comment here is irrelevant. What a woman on some rural farm in China thinks has no bearing on what actually IS.
 
Lol. "Its" is the wrong usage. It's is the correct usage in that sentence.

Clearly not an educated post or logical position after all.

Grammar attack. The last vestige of the defeated. Poor Ryan. Your dumb analogy was taken apart so all you had left was THIS. :lol:

Tell us the difference between sexual orientation and sexual behavior.
 
With the absence of sexual orientation to adults at all? Real life examples, please.

I have no idea what you're talking about. You keep asking me for examples of pedophiles who like a specific gender of child? How about 95% or more of all pedophiles in history?
 
'If someone only molests young boys is he gay, a pedohile, or both'

Who ****ing cares?

Why would anyone even think of such a thing...let alone think enough about it to start a thread about it?

What's next - if a pedophile were a tree, what kind of tree would they be?
 
How can such a stupid issue receive soooo many posts and last this long?

The answer is simple. The one who does that is by good odds dead and gone in probably worst ways imaginable.

Neither the public nor inmates want such people.
 
Back
Top Bottom