You were refuted in the very thread you linked.
False,
obviously.
No one "refuted" via scientific reference to the contrary the valid scientific presentation that homosexuality is a birth defect,
no one.
A number of people
whined, as they couldn't handled the "startling" revelation that homosexuality is a birth defect, but that's all.
No "refuting" occurred, whatsoever.
Why just a quick read of that thread makes it
crystal clear not only that homosexuality is a birth defect, but that no one "refuted" that reality at all .. they merely
whined.
No need to go into it again.
Absolutely -- as it was scientifically presented that homosexuality is a birth defect, and thus whining about it any further is futile.
It is not a birth defect.
"It is not, it is not, it is not!"
:roll:
Yet the whining just keeps on coming ...
You cannot show any legitimate evidence that it is.
:yawn:
http://www.debatepolitics.com/sex-and-sexuality/160480-homosexuality-birth-defect.html#post1061800678
And it will not "go away" within the next 3 to 4 decades.
Again, blatant reality denial from Roguenuke.
Now that it has been scientifically presented that homosexuality is a birth defect, research scientists dedicated to the prevention of birth defects will soon find a prevention for the birth defect of homosexuality, because the epigenetic etiology of it is similar to that of spina bifida which scientists have greatly prevented simply by giving the pregnant woman specific vitamins.
Truly, it's only a matter of time.
Believing that is just plain ignorance.
And your projection here is reminiscent of those who once refused to believe the scientific presentations that Earth is eliptically round not flat and that it revolves around the Sun not vice versa. :lol:
If you wish to rehash the debate about the scientific reality that homosexuality is a birth defect, that's your call ..
..
But the scientifically presented reality that homosexuality is an epigenetically inculcated birth defect is germane to this thread, as the reality of it and the likely prevention of it in the next five years or so speaks directly to the question posed in this thread.