• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What will the status of Gay marriage be in the USA in 2050

What will the status of Gay marriage be in the USA in 2050?


  • Total voters
    32
Here you simply make a number of obviously false ideology-based reality denial statements that a quick review of the both the OP -- http://www.debatepolitics.com/sex-and-sexuality/160480-homosexuality-birth-defect.html#post1061800678 -- and the other posts I made in the thread validate.

Whining "no it's not, no it's not, no it's not!" will simply not make the birth defect reality of homosexuality go away.

Acceptance is really for the best.

Where is your evidence that homosexuality is a birth defect?
 
Where is your evidence that homosexuality is a birth defect?
:roll:

You just quoted a link to an entire forest, yet you still ask, "where are the trees?".

:roll:

Your lean says "other", but you've got to be liberal with regard to social issues. :lol:


Regardless, the scientifically presented reality that homosexuality is an epigenetically inculcated birth defect is germane to this thread, as the reality of it and the likely prevention of it in the next five years or so speaks directly to the question posed in this thread.
 
:roll:

You just quoted a link to an entire forest, yet you still ask, "where are the trees?".

:roll:

Your lean says "other", but you've got to be liberal with regard to social issues. :lol:


Regardless, the scientifically presented reality that homosexuality is an epigenetically inculcated birth defect is germane to this thread, as the reality of it and the likely prevention of it in the next five years or so speaks directly to the question posed in this thread.

I clicked on your epigenetic links but saw nothing about homosexuality. So I ask again, do you have any evidence that it is a birth defect, or are you just going to obsess over my "lean"?
 
Here you simply make a number of obviously false ideology-based reality denial statements that a quick review of the both the OP -- http://www.debatepolitics.com/sex-and-sexuality/160480-homosexuality-birth-defect.html#post1061800678 -- and the other posts I made in the thread validate.

Whining "no it's not, no it's not, no it's not!" will simply not make the birth defect reality of homosexuality go away.

Acceptance is really for the best.
You have nothing worth accepting. You don't have any real evidence. Post #6 debunked your claim in that topic sufficiently enough. You point to a forest of trees yet they've all been cut down.
 
I clicked on your epigenetic links but saw nothing about homosexuality. So I ask again, do you have any evidence that it is a birth defect, or are you just going to obsess over my "lean"?
Blatant reality denial, saying that this OP's -- http://www.debatepolitics.com/sex-and-sexuality/160480-homosexuality-birth-defect.html#post1061800678 -- epigentic links contain "nothing about homosexuality", will only cause the many casual readers who pass this way and who read that OP to disregard your posts as the ideologically based damage control M.O. of sticking your head in the sand and closing your eyes so tight that you can't see what everyone else clearly sees.

Your lean is clearly liberal in the social issues, obviously.

The only person obsessing here is you, so much so that you've succumbed to the ostrich maneuver of dealing with difficult realities. That's pretty darn obsessive. :lol:
 
Blatant reality denial, saying that this OP's -- http://www.debatepolitics.com/sex-and-sexuality/160480-homosexuality-birth-defect.html#post1061800678 -- epigentic links contain "nothing about homosexuality", will only cause the many casual readers who pass this way and who read that OP to disregard your posts as the ideologically based damage control M.O. of sticking your head in the sand and closing your eyes so tight that you can't see what everyone else clearly sees.

Your lean is clearly liberal in the social issues, obviously.

The only person obsessing here is you, so much so that you've succumbed to the ostrich maneuver of dealing with difficult realities. That's pretty darn obsessive. :lol:

Do you have any evidence from psychological journals? Studies? Something that's not your own posts?
 
You have nothing worth accepting. You don't have any real evidence. Post #6 debunked your claim in that topic sufficiently enough. You point to a forest of trees yet they've all been cut down.
False, obviously.

Post #6 was simply one of the larger whines in the thread by those who couldn't accept the obvious reality of the OP, so they resorted to ad hominems and, of course, mere unsupported ideological opinion for which they could find no scientific links of substantiation.

Indeed, if you follow that thread, you will find no posts by anyone to any scientific conjecture or refutation for the scientists and their study linked in the OP, not one.

Again, like most liberals on this issue, you simply hope that by repeating denials of obvious reality that you'll somehow score points.

You won't.

Casual readers who pass this way will read the thread, see the science and the scientific presentation, realize many whiners simply were stunned and could find no scientific links to contradict the science presented in the OP, and were merely behaving like the church hundreds of years ago when scientists presented that the Earth was epliptically round, not flat, and that it revolved around the Sun, not vice versa.

So call these scientists that presented beyond any rational scientific conjecture that homosexuality is epigenetic in its etiology, like the birth defects of spina bifida and cleft palate, call them "heretics" if you wish ..

.. But, like the church, you will eventually come to look like they did, and, recant and accept and adjust to the new scientific accurately presented reality. It's simply only a matter of time.

Tick tock, liberals.
 
Do you have any evidence from psychological journals? Studies? Something that's not your own posts?
Spammingly repeating your ostrich behavior will, again, not score you any points with casual readers who pass this way.

It simply does not matter that I posted the OP.

What matters is that the OP contained links to the scientific presentation that homosexuality has an epigenetically inculcated etiology that makes it a birth defect.

Everyone who reads the links in the OP can see that.

That you can't see it is, well, due to your ostrich maneuver, a maneuver that everyone else most certainly sees. :shock: .. .. :lol:
 
Do you have any evidence from psychological journals? Studies? Something that's not your own posts?

of course not, facts defeat the op often and this thread isnt any different. Every respected and honest poster knows this already and if they dont all they have to do is read this thread and it will be proven to them.
 
Spammingly repeating your ostrich behavior will, again, not score you any points with casual readers who pass this way.

It simply does not matter that I posted the OP.

What matters is that the OP contained links to the scientific presentation that homosexuality has an epigenetically inculcated etiology that makes it a birth defect.

Everyone who reads the links in the OP can see that.

That you can't see it is, well, due to your ostrich maneuver, a maneuver that everyone else most certainly sees. :shock: .. .. :lol:

Go ahead, use the word "ostrich" til you're blue in the face. There is nothing in that crap post of yours that linked to any scientific article drawing a correlation between homosexuality and birth defects.
 
Go ahead, use the word "ostrich" til you're blue in the face. There is nothing in that crap post of yours that linked to any scientific article that drew a correlation between homosexuality and birth defects.

and facts defeat the op again
 
Go ahead, use the word "ostrich" til you're blue in the face. There is nothing in that crap post of yours that linked to any scientific article drawing a correlation between homosexuality and birth defects.
Your use of the word "crap" to describe the scientifically respectful and articulate presentation of the obvious birth defect reality of homosexuality betrays your liberal ideology which accounts for your denial.

I see the liberal denialists are out in full force today.

Enjoy your denial.

New supporting scientific articles are forthcoming.
 
There is nothing in that crap post of yours that linked to any scientific article drawing a correlation between homosexuality and birth defects.

ding ding ding we have a winner, this is correct its made up opinion that has been destroyed
 
False, obviously.

Post #6 was simply one of the larger whines in the thread by those who couldn't accept the obvious reality of the OP, so they resorted to ad hominems and, of course, mere unsupported ideological opinion for which they could find no scientific links of substantiation.

Indeed, if you follow that thread, you will find no posts by anyone to any scientific conjecture or refutation for the scientists and their study linked in the OP, not one.

Again, like most liberals on this issue, you simply hope that by repeating denials of obvious reality that you'll somehow score points.

You won't.

Casual readers who pass this way will read the thread, see the science and the scientific presentation, realize many whiners simply were stunned and could find no scientific links to contradict the science presented in the OP, and were merely behaving like the church hundreds of years ago when scientists presented that the Earth was epliptically round, not flat, and that it revolved around the Sun, not vice versa.

So call these scientists that presented beyond any rational scientific conjecture that homosexuality is epigenetic in its etiology, like the birth defects of spina bifida and cleft palate, call them "heretics" if you wish ..

.. But, like the church, you will eventually come to look like they did, and, recant and accept and adjust to the new scientific accurately presented reality. It's simply only a matter of time.

Tick tock, liberals.
Calling refutations of your non-arguments whines doesn't make them false. You're just ranting now.
 
Back
Top Bottom