View Poll Results: 2014 Predictions for the Senate and the House (multiple selections):

Voters
33. You may not vote on this poll
  • Republicans become the majority; Democrats the minority in the Senate

    15 45.45%
  • Republicans remain the minority; Democrats the majority in the Senate

    15 45.45%
  • Republicans remain the majority; Democrats the minority in the House

    18 54.55%
  • Republicans become the minority; Democrats the majority in the House

    6 18.18%
  • I want to abolish Congress and Obama made King

    4 12.12%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: 2014 Election (the Senate and House)

  1. #1
    Guru
    Porchev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    GA
    Last Seen
    01-08-17 @ 12:49 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    3,092

    2014 Election (the Senate and House)

    What do think will happen in 2014? 33 Senate seats will be voted on in 2014, 20 are Democrats and 13 are Republicans.
    Current Senate Breakdown:
    54 Democrats (2 Independents -Sanders and King)
    46 Republicans
    House Breakdown:
    233 Republicans
    200 Democrats
    2 Seats Undecided
    ---I think the Republicans will be voted in as the majority party in the Senate and retain the majority in the House of Representatives.
    Here is article on how they could potentially do that in the Senate: 2014 Senate Elections: Here is the Republican Roadmap to Victory

  2. #2
    Professor
    iacardsfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Last Seen
    11-24-17 @ 09:51 PM
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    1,981

    Re: 2014 Election (the Senate and House)

    I don't see any way that the Republicans get the majority.

    Unless Governor McDonnell runs (which I don't think he will, I think he is gearing up for a run at the WH) then Virginia is a lock for the Dems. South Dakota is going to the Dems I am positive, and I think Arkansas will go to the Dems. Leaving the Republicans far short of their needed number.
    "Conservatism is the blind and fear-filled worship of dead radicals."
    - Mark Twain
    Run your own nation, play Cybernations.

  3. #3
    Advisor
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Liberal
    Posts
    384

    Re: 2014 Election (the Senate and House)

    Quote Originally Posted by Porchev View Post
    What do think will happen in 2014? 33 Senate seats will be voted on in 2014, 20 are Democrats and 13 are Republicans.
    Current Senate Breakdown:
    54 Democrats (2 Independents -Sanders and King)
    46 Republicans
    House Breakdown:
    233 Republicans
    200 Democrats
    2 Seats Undecided
    ---I think the Republicans will be voted in as the majority party in the Senate and retain the majority in the House of Representatives.
    Here is article on how they could potentially do that in the Senate: 2014 Senate Elections: Here is the Republican Roadmap to Victory
    Well Republicans certainly have a road map, a pathway to a majority in the Senate. They also had one in 2012, and they kind of got lost along the way and ended up on the corner of Akin and Murdoch amongst other little bumps in the road. The GOP lost races in Missouri, Indiana, and North Dakota of all places, and honestly besides the push in the Senate with the immigration bill, I don't see much of what Republicans have been doing to improve their brand in order to make themselves more palatable to voters. Barring some unforeseen calamity, the economy will be better in 2014 and the deficit will be less than it is today, and that almost always helps the party in power. It's probably not going to be that much better in a year, but enough to where Democrats can point to it and say, "It's... something!"

    Right now, I'd say the Democrats would keep the Senate, and pick up a few seats in the House but not get a majority. If the immigration bill dies in the House, then we might see something worse in store for Republicans in the next election.

    Just because they have a map, doesn't mean they have a car that can make the journey, and I don't see it yet.

  4. #4
    Sage
    Phys251's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Georgia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:34 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Liberal
    Posts
    12,785

    Re: 2014 Election (the Senate and House)

    Poll doesn't make sense.
    "A man you can bait with a tweet is not a man we can trust with nuclear weapons." --Hillary Rodham Clinton
    "Innocent until proven guilty is for criminal convictions, not elections." --Mitt Romney

  5. #5
    Guru
    Porchev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    GA
    Last Seen
    01-08-17 @ 12:49 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    3,092

    Re: 2014 Election (the Senate and House)

    Quote Originally Posted by ToastyOats View Post
    Well Republicans certainly have a road map, a pathway to a majority in the Senate. They also had one in 2012, and they kind of got lost along the way and ended up on the corner of Akin and Murdoch amongst other little bumps in the road. The GOP lost races in Missouri, Indiana, and North Dakota of all places, and honestly besides the push in the Senate with the immigration bill, I don't see much of what Republicans have been doing to improve their brand in order to make themselves more palatable to voters. Barring some unforeseen calamity, the economy will be better in 2014 and the deficit will be less than it is today, and that almost always helps the party in power. It's probably not going to be that much better in a year, but enough to where Democrats can point to it and say, "It's... something!"

    Right now, I'd say the Democrats would keep the Senate, and pick up a few seats in the House but not get a majority. If the immigration bill dies in the House, then we might see something worse in store for Republicans in the next election.

    Just because they have a map, doesn't mean they have a car that can make the journey, and I don't see it yet.
    Too many people are told that the Republican Party doesn't care about the poor, minorities, women, having clean air and water, etc. but that is simply not true. It is an uphill battle for the Republicans to fight against such negativity. So in my opinion the Republicans are always the underdog and it is never easy, however, I think it will look more like 2010 than 2012. All the recent scandals will be a factor and Obama-care is becoming less and less popular as time goes on and more people learn details of it.

    About Akin and Murdoch, they absolutely don't need people like that, and as it says at that link, "They don’t need any more Christine O’Donnells and Sharron Angles or Todd Akins and Richard Mourdocks, especially in states where Republicans shouldn’t be losing elections."

  6. #6
    Global Moderator
    Moderator
    Anagram's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    St. Louis MO
    Last Seen
    Today @ 09:18 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    6,198

    Re: 2014 Election (the Senate and House)

    Quote Originally Posted by Porchev View Post
    What do think will happen in 2014? 33 Senate seats will be voted on in 2014, 20 are Democrats and 13 are Republicans.
    Current Senate Breakdown:
    54 Democrats (2 Independents -Sanders and King)
    46 Republicans
    House Breakdown:
    233 Republicans
    200 Democrats
    2 Seats Undecided
    ---I think the Republicans will be voted in as the majority party in the Senate and retain the majority in the House of Representatives.
    Here is article on how they could potentially do that in the Senate: 2014 Senate Elections: Here is the Republican Roadmap to Victory
    As it stands right now I think the Republicans will not take over the Senate. Short of an Act of God they will remain control in the house.

    They need six seats to take the Senate.

    South Dakota and West Virginia should be easy takeovers so long as Rounds and Capito when their primaries. I suppose if Nick Rahall were to run in West Virginia he would have a very outside shot at victory if everything went his and the Democrats way.

    In Alaska, it's probably a tossup if its Treadwell vs Begich, but Begich would be a favorite if Joe Miller gets the nomination again.

    Hagan is probably a very small favorite in North Carolina, but that could easily be taken in a moderate Republican year.

    Louisiana and Minnesota are probably tossups right now. A good Republican candidate could beat Landrieu or Pryor.

    Assuming Schweitzer runs, Montana probably leans toward the Democrats as it seems like Racicot who would be the GOP's best candidate is leaning against running.

    The GOP had a shot at taking Harkin or Levin's seats, but the Democrats have coalesced around strong candidates there, all strong Republicans have declined to run, and both states have a Democratic tilt anyway.

    Republicans have an outside shot of taking down Merkley, Shaheen, or Mark Udall. Democrats have an outside shot at Georgia and Kentucky.

    All in all, I think the GOP falls just short.
    There should be Instant Runoff Voting

  7. #7
    Global Moderator
    Moderator
    Anagram's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    St. Louis MO
    Last Seen
    Today @ 09:18 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    6,198

    Re: 2014 Election (the Senate and House)

    Quote Originally Posted by iacardsfan View Post
    I don't see any way that the Republicans get the majority.

    Unless Governor McDonnell runs (which I don't think he will, I think he is gearing up for a run at the WH) then Virginia is a lock for the Dems. South Dakota is going to the Dems I am positive, and I think Arkansas will go to the Dems. Leaving the Republicans far short of their needed number.
    Why do you think South Dakota is going to the Dems? I think they screwed themselves there by picking Weiland and forcing Herseth Sandlin out of the primary.
    There should be Instant Runoff Voting

  8. #8
    Professor
    iacardsfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Last Seen
    11-24-17 @ 09:51 PM
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    1,981

    Re: 2014 Election (the Senate and House)

    Quote Originally Posted by Anagram View Post
    Why do you think South Dakota is going to the Dems? I think they screwed themselves there by picking Weiland and forcing Herseth Sandlin out of the primary.
    I just see them becoming more liberal as a state. I could be wrong, but in all reality, it doesn't matter even if one of those doesn't happen they don't take majority.
    "Conservatism is the blind and fear-filled worship of dead radicals."
    - Mark Twain
    Run your own nation, play Cybernations.

  9. #9
    Guru
    Porchev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    GA
    Last Seen
    01-08-17 @ 12:49 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    3,092

    Re: 2014 Election (the Senate and House)

    Quote Originally Posted by Anagram View Post
    As it stands right now I think the Republicans will not take over the Senate. Short of an Act of God they will remain control in the house.

    They need six seats to take the Senate.

    South Dakota and West Virginia should be easy takeovers so long as Rounds and Capito when their primaries. I suppose if Nick Rahall were to run in West Virginia he would have a very outside shot at victory if everything went his and the Democrats way.

    In Alaska, it's probably a tossup if its Treadwell vs Begich, but Begich would be a favorite if Joe Miller gets the nomination again.

    Hagan is probably a very small favorite in North Carolina, but that could easily be taken in a moderate Republican year.

    Louisiana and Minnesota are probably tossups right now. A good Republican candidate could beat Landrieu or Pryor.

    Assuming Schweitzer runs, Montana probably leans toward the Democrats as it seems like Racicot who would be the GOP's best candidate is leaning against running.

    The GOP had a shot at taking Harkin or Levin's seats, but the Democrats have coalesced around strong candidates there, all strong Republicans have declined to run, and both states have a Democratic tilt anyway.

    Republicans have an outside shot of taking down Merkley, Shaheen, or Mark Udall. Democrats have an outside shot at Georgia and Kentucky.

    All in all, I think the GOP falls just short.
    About Alaska, like him or not, I believe the numbers more or less show that Joe Miller would be a Senator now if Murkowski would have accepted the results of the primary. So I would not count him out yet. Treadmill or Miller would have a good chance of winning.

    Montana: you may be right. Although Schweitzer might make an attempt at running for President in 2016, no matter what he does in 2014, and honestly if we are going to have another President from the Democratic Party, he would be a moderate down to earth Democrat and that would be a move to the center from what we have now.

  10. #10
    Global Moderator
    Moderator
    Anagram's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    St. Louis MO
    Last Seen
    Today @ 09:18 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    6,198

    Re: 2014 Election (the Senate and House)

    Quote Originally Posted by Porchev View Post
    About Alaska, like him or not, I believe the numbers more or less show that Joe Miller would be a Senator now if Murkowski would have accepted the results of the primary. So I would not count him out yet. Treadmill or Miller would have a good chance of winning.
    True. But 2010 was a very Republican year and there's no guarantee 2014 will be as good. McAdams was also a much worse candidate than Begich, who has double digit approval right now in Alaska. Joe Miller's also seen his favorability decline to something like -40 and Republican leaning and Democratic leaning polling has had Miller down 23 and 28 to Begich right now, so I'd rather not chance it and just have Treadwell win the primary.

    Montana: you may be right. Although Schweitzer might make an attempt at running for President in 2016, no matter what he does in 2014, and honestly if we are going to have another President from the Democratic Party, he would be a moderate down to earth Democrat and that would be a move to the center from what we have now.
    Without a doubt a step up. If I had to have a Democrat president Schweitzer would be near the top of my list.
    There should be Instant Runoff Voting

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •