So... what part of the above definition supports your scientific declaration that sexual attraction is learned, and not natural?learn (lūrn)
v. learned also learnt (lūrnt), learn·ing, learns
1. To gain knowledge, comprehension, or mastery of through experience or study.
2. To fix in the mind or memory; memorize: learned the speech in a few hours.
a. To acquire experience of or an ability or a skill in: learn tolerance; learned how to whistle.
b. To become aware: learned that it was best not to argue.
4. To become informed of; find out.
Let's prove that they're born gay. The other options all fall into two main categories, they were "confused" children or they choose to be gay.
The idea that kids are "confused" into being gay is kind of easy to disprove; remember in the 50's and before, where being openly gay could pretty much ensure you getting beaten to death in the streets? There were plenty of gays, they were documented and polled by underground physicians and such; it's not like "gay" is a new phenomenon. And yet, there were still gays. How? According to the theory that kids are "confused" by openly gay people and by gay couples, and that's why they're gay, how does that explain gay people in the 50's or before, or in the current day, in places where open homosexuality can carry a death sentence? There aren't any openly gay people under those circumstances, and yet there are still people that develop into gay adults. How?
It's kind of obvious that gay people have been a fairly consistent portion of the population, whether society has acknowledged them or not, whether they were openly gay or not, so it's kind of self-evident that social acceptance or openness of Homosexuality is not the cause of Homosexuality. That destroys the "confused children" theory/fear. That leave's "they choose to be gay" or "they're born gay".
Nobody, in the history of the world, has ever said they "chose" to be gay. There is no evidence that anyone can choose to switch their orientation (you try it, maybe I'm wrong). Above all else, there is no motive for choosing to be gay. I mean, really, what do they "get" for being gay? Buttsex? In case you didn't know, girls have one too. Or do you think there's a secret "gay" religion where they go to gay heaven if they're Homosexual enough. Nope, in real life they get beaten, threatened, tortured, murdered, discriminated, and overall mistreatment. What is their motive? I can safely say that there isn't one, and that blows that theory out of the water; nobody chooses to be gay.
By power of deduction, that leaves us with the only remaining option; they were born gay. Does it matter that nobody has a definitive answer for why? Nope, you can narrow down the solution to a possible range of valid answers without knowing which one it is; Just because I don't know how they are born gay doesn't mean it's not the only available range of answers, it's all that's left. They were born gay, whether we know how or not, just like the sky is blue, whether you know why or not.