can your rights be taken away........if you have not committed a crime or something were you have done something where pain of death can occur.............no!
citizens cannot violate the u.s. constitution, they can only commit crimes against their fellow citizens, this is what gives government authority to take or restrict your rights only!
and i have repeatedly stated ............crimes committed.........if no crime is committed, or health and safety issue................... no rights can be taken or restricted.
Absolute rights belong to us due to the nature of our existence, are "unalienable" and "self-evident."
The absolute rights of individuals may be resolved into the right of personal security, the right of personal liberty, and the right to acquire and enjoy property. These rights are declared to be natural, inherent, and unalienable. Atchison & N. R. Co. v. Baty, 6 Neb. 37, 40, 29 Am. Rep. 356.
By the "absolute rights" of individuals is meant those which are so in their primary and strictest sense, such as would belong to their persons merely in a state of nature, and which every man is entitled to enjoy, whether out of society or in it. The rights of personal security, of personal liberty, and private property do not depend upon the Constitution for their existence. They existed before the Constitution was made, or the government was organized. These are what are termed the "absolute rights" of individuals, which belong to them independently of all government, and which all governments which derive their power from the consent of the governed were instituted to protect. People v. Berberrich (N. Y.) 20 Barb. 224, 229; McCartee v. Orphan Asylum Soc. (N. Y.) 9 Cow. 437, 511, 513, 18 Am. Dec. 516; People v. Toynbee (N. Y.) 2 Parker, Cr. R. 329, 369, 370 (quoting 1 Bl. Comm. 123).
Chancellor Kent (2 Kent, Comm. 1) defines the "absolute rights" of individuals as the right of personal security, the right of personal liberty, and the right to acquire and enjoy property. These rights have been justly considered and frequently declared by the people of this country to be natural, inherent, and inalienable, and it may be stated as a legal axiom [A principle that is not disputed; a maxim] that since the great laboring masses of our country have little or no property but their labor, and the free right to employ it to their own best interests and advantage, it must be considered that the constitutional inhibition against all invasion of property without due process of law was as fully intended to embrace and protect that property as any of the accumulations it may have gained. In re Jacobs (N. Y.) 33 Hun, 374, 378.
you misunderstand.....if i own a business and i close at 9pm, ...but you have a right to enter my store, then that gives you authority by that right..........to enter my store even if it closed at 3am......that is why it cannot be a right.
then commerce keeps them from discrimination
now false advertisement. keeps them from discrimination.
you have no right to be served, that is impossible, becuase it would lay a burden on another citizen, ..no right under the constitution......... lays a burden of cost or service on anyone ...that's unconstitutional